'Dukes of Hazzard' Tom Wopat: Soon to star in; 'Groping On Cocaine' the Good Old Lifestyle!

[Baz Ares]

HEADLINES
'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Tom Wopat in Court After He's Charged With Groping Woman. August 3, 2017.
The 65-year-old actor was in a Massachusetts court Thursday, facing a charge of indecent assault.

The allegations came last month when Wopat, who's starring in the musical 42nd Street, allegedly groped a woman on the set.

“He walked up to her from behind and grabbed her buttocks,” the prosecutor said in court. “He said he flirts with people but did nothing inappropriate.”

Wopat's problems multiplied when police found two baggies of what appeared to be cocaine in his car.
Tom Wopat, of New York and Nashville, pleaded not guilty to indecent assault and battery and drug possession.



'Dukes Of Hazzard' Star Tom Wopat In Court After He's Charged With Groping Woman

SOOooooo. Let's hear it for the Groping Drug Addict Girls and Boys.



'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Arrested With Drugs in Mass.: PD
He told police that he buys cocaine "in large quantities and uses it over time," the court documents said.
--http://www.nbcchicago.com/entertainment/entertainment-news/Former-Dukes-of-Hazzard-Star-Arrested-in-Waltham-Massachusetts-48330803.html-
'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Faces Indecent Assault, Drug Charges

 

[Baz Ares]

BTW. It was payback for the Girls that day.
AS he appeared to be in front of what looks like a hot Judge there.

Seems One Nasty older Good Ol' Boy going to do some time we can hope.

 

[Baz Ares]

In Massachusetts, a conviction for any drug charge, even "simple" possession, will have far-reaching collateral consequences. as it will automatically bar you from ever obtaining certain licenses. For example, any drug related conviction will prevent you from obtaining many professional licenses, including a Massachusetts liquor license to own a bar or restaurant. It is also very unlikely that you would ever be issued a LTC (license to carry a firearm), even though one would think that a simple drug charge would have nothing to do with one's fitness to possess a firearm.

In Massachusetts, under MGL c. 94C s. 34, in order to be convicted of possession of a controlled substance, the prosecution must prove that you:

1. You knowingly or intentionally possessed
2. A controlled substance

First, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the substance falls within one of the classes of controlled substances under MGL c. 94C s. 31. If the arresting officer has enough experience, education, and qualifications with respect to drug recognition training, his observations and opinion may be enough to prove the classification of the drug. However, if this is the only evidence of the drug's classification, a thorough cross-examination may discredit the officer's testimony, leaving reasonable doubt with respect to that element. The prosecution may take their case a step further by admitting certification of the drug after testing by the state police drug lab. However, this lab is notorious for its undue delays, and if the prosecution is unable to obtain a certification within a reasonable amount of time, the court may prohibit them for offering it into evidence.
In order to prove possession, the prosecution can either prove actual possession (the substance was in your hand, in your pocket, etc.) or constructive possession. Constructive possession means that you had the means to control, and in fact had the intent to exhibit control of the substance. An example would be that the substance was in the trunk of your car, or under a couch seat cushion where you were sitting. For either type of possession, however, the prosecution must prove that you had knowledge the substance was there. For example, it is the prosecution's burden to prove that the drugs weren't put in your jacket pocket while the jacket was checked at a bar. Of course, a reasonable jury can conclude that you knew what was in your own jacket pocket, but if there is any reason to believe otherwise, we will certainly make that point at trial.
Under MGL c. 94C s. 35, the "possession" element for heroin is much more broad. It is a separate crime to knowingly be present where heroin is kept. That means if you are present at a house and you know that heroin is anywhere in that house, or if you are walking with your friend who you know to have heroin in his/her pocket, even if you don't have control over the substance, you can face up to 1 year in jail and $1,000 fine under this statute.


The potential penalties vary depending on the specific class of drug you are charged with possessing.

Possession of a class A substance in Massachusetts (heroin, morphine, GHB, Special K) carries the following potential penalties:

• 2 years in jail
• $2,000 fine

A second offense for possession of class A is a FELONY in Massachusetts, carrying the following potential penalties:

• 5 years in state prison
• $5,000 fine

Possession of a class B substance in Massachusetts (cocaine, crack, LSD, oxycodone, oxycontin, ecstacy, hydrochloride, amphetamine, methamphetamine) carries the following potential penalties:

• 1 year in jail
• $1,000 fine
• --
• --
• Cocaine trafficking carries the following penalties:
  
  
  • 14 grams up to 28 grams will result in a punishment of 3 to 15 years in state prison. There is a mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years in state prison;
  • 28 grams up to 100 grams will result in a punishment of 5 to 20 years in state prison. There is a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years in state prison;

 

[tinydancer]

Try decaf for heavens sake. Who the hell can get worked up over Tom Wopat?

 

[miketx]

Try decaf for heavens sake. Who the hell can get worked up over Tom Wopat?

He likes older men who flew the stars and bars.

 

[Baz Ares]

Try decaf for heavens sake. Who the hell can get worked up over Tom Wopat?

He's a drug addict like a few duck draino-nasty morons are.
Who's worked up. Do these folks share?

 

[MarathonMike]

If you have to post 3 or 4 times in your own thread to spawn interest:
THREAD FAIL

Next time make your fonts even bigger that makes it really interesting!

 

[tinydancer]

BTW Wopat isn't a good old boy. Just an actor in a television show.

Wisconsin.

 

[Baz Ares]

BTW Wopat isn't a good old boy. Just an actor in a television show.

Wisconsin.

Okay, just the car, a loser flag, and the Great Orange Douche. Check!

 

[EverCurious]

Jesus, these fuckers can't even tell the difference between a TV show and reality...

 

[Baz Ares]

Jesus, these fuckers can't even tell the difference between a TV show and reality...

Really, the times I've gone into these small backwater towns.
This is what I don't see.

 

[EverCurious]

Jesus, these fuckers can't even tell the difference between a TV show and reality...

Really, the times I've gone into these small backwater towns.
This is what I see.

I have a strong feeling you've never left your parents house kido...

 

[Baz Ares]

But I do see these.

 

[Silent Warrior]

Those on the far left always believe Hollywood and post pictures they got on the internet while surfing in mommy's basement..

 

[2aguy]

HEADLINES
'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Tom Wopat in Court After He's Charged With Groping Woman. August 3, 2017.
The 65-year-old actor was in a Massachusetts court Thursday, facing a charge of indecent assault.

The allegations came last month when Wopat, who's starring in the musical 42nd Street, allegedly groped a woman on the set.

“He walked up to her from behind and grabbed her buttocks,” the prosecutor said in court. “He said he flirts with people but did nothing inappropriate.”

Wopat's problems multiplied when police found two baggies of what appeared to be cocaine in his car.
Tom Wopat, of New York and Nashville, pleaded not guilty to indecent assault and battery and drug possession.



'Dukes Of Hazzard' Star Tom Wopat In Court After He's Charged With Groping Woman

SOOooooo. Let's hear it for the Groping Drug Addict Girls and Boys.



'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Arrested With Drugs in Mass.: PD
He told police that he buys cocaine "in large quantities and uses it over time," the court documents said.
--http://www.nbcchicago.com/entertainment/entertainment-news/Former-Dukes-of-Hazzard-Star-Arrested-in-Waltham-Massachusetts-48330803.html-
'Dukes of Hazzard' Star Faces Indecent Assault, Drug Charges

This guy is an actor....you asswipes still allow bill clinton....a serial rapist and someone who has "groped" dozens of women, and used his political office, his wife and all of his resources to keep these women from stopping his crimes.....to appear in public on your behalf....

you are the morons...this guy is just a sad human being...

 

[ChrisL]

BTW Wopat isn't a good old boy. Just an actor in a television show.

Wisconsin.

Okay, just the car, a loser flag, and the Great Orange Douche. Check!

Err, that was a television show, not real life.

 

[ChrisL]

Jesus, these fuckers can't even tell the difference between a TV show and reality...

That's exactly what I was thinking. WTH? Lol.

 

[EverCurious]

Jesus, these fuckers can't even tell the difference between a TV show and reality...

That's exactly what I was thinking. WTH? Lol.

My husband actually has a theory about this so he gets credit for it. He truly believes that TV, movies, and commercials have ruined shit. Every time we see a stupid cute commercial he goes off about how all the idiots are going to think that's the way it is now heh

 

[ChrisL]

The blonde one was super cute.

 

[Marion Morrison]

^Now Bo is right wing-ish. He even plays parts in Christian movies.