Durham Investigation Ends After 3 Years Of Searching, $40 Million Spent, And Nothing Found

On May 13, 2019, then-Attorney General Bill Barr let it be known that at Donald Trump’s “request,” he was conducting an investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. To conduct this investigation, Barr appointed his very own special prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Durham. For the next three-and-a-half years, Republicans made confident predictions that “Bull” Durham was going to be the man to finally “lock ‘er up.” Surely Durham, unleashed with no deadline, budgetary limit, or constraint on where he looked, would prove conclusively that every conspiracy theory pushed by Trump was true.

But after more than three years and more than $40 million spent, Durham managed to produce just a single charge: accusing Democratic-linked attorney Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI for not revealing secondhand connections to Hillary Clinton’s campaign when talking to them about Donald Trump’s Russia dealings. In May, a jury found Sussman not guilty of the ridiculous charge.



Unlimited investigation with no budgetary constraints, or time limit?

Hmm…
Its easy to come up empty when you’re not looking
 
Confusing the executive with the administration,,,,

Yes, struth is. She claimed the FBI is part of the president's administration. Which it's not. After her ignorance on that was exposed, she's now trying to switch to the Executive branch, which it is.
 
hahah the fbi is the doj, i don’t disagree the president can use other agencies under his authority to abuse

LOL

No, dumbass, it's just a department within it. It's the investigative arm of the Department of Justice...

 
Then why did he plead guilty? He was a lawyer himself, he should have gone pro se rather than plead to a felony for a typo. Oh, wait. You said typo at first, but now you say that he deliberately changed it because he believed the information was incorrect?

Does that really make sense to you, that he got an email and said, "oopsie! They said 'is a source,' but I bet they meant to say 'is not a source.' Should I call them and ask them to resend it with the correct words? Naaaaah . . . it's so obvious that I can just make the change myself. Done."

Or did he think that they meant to say "is a source," but were mistaken because he knew better than they did who they were working with?

He did that in all honesty and integrity, but then pled to a felony?

I get that his lawyer would be willing to embarrass himself by making that claim. But you're doing it for free?

Do you believe that Carter Page was a source or was not a source?

The DNC/DOJ/FBI spent far more than that, for a far longer period of time, and came up with zero convictions for Russian collusion. They could have had an easy one if they'd charged the Hillary campaign.

Huh? How much did the DNC spend on searching for Russian collusion?
 
On May 13, 2019, then-Attorney General Bill Barr let it be known that at Donald Trump’s “request,” he was conducting an investigation into the origins of the Russia investigation. To conduct this investigation, Barr appointed his very own special prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Durham. For the next three-and-a-half years, Republicans made confident predictions that “Bull” Durham was going to be the man to finally “lock ‘er up.” Surely Durham, unleashed with no deadline, budgetary limit, or constraint on where he looked, would prove conclusively that every conspiracy theory pushed by Trump was true.

But after more than three years and more than $40 million spent, Durham managed to produce just a single charge: accusing Democratic-linked attorney Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI for not revealing secondhand connections to Hillary Clinton’s campaign when talking to them about Donald Trump’s Russia dealings. In May, a jury found Sussman not guilty of the ridiculous charge.



Unlimited investigation with no budgetary constraints, or time limit?

Hmm…
Dailydoosh
 
This investigation proved to be a waste of taxpayer money. A botched investigation started by incompetent AG Barr.
 
Yes, struth is. She claimed the FBI is part of the president's administration. Which it's not. After her ignorance on that was exposed, she's now trying to switch to the Executive branch, which it is.

being dumb…and acting…
 
LOL

You moron, that doesn't make them part of the president's administration.

face-palm-gif.278959
why not?
 
Nobody of importance was ever convicted except for a low level lawyer. Three years and only one insignificant conviction means it was botched.

So? That doesn't mean it was botched. It means there wasn't a conspiracy as some claimed.
 

Because this was Obama's administration...


... please make a note that the FBI was not a member of his administration.
 

Forum List

Back
Top