Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You certainly aren't concerned about the obsession Hillary Clinton has with the majority of the Americans who rejected her, and are now vicious Hillary's attempt at conspiratorial revenge is over. It's over buster. She's going to jail.Someone has a Hillary obsession
No, We want the kind of Justice that keeps criminals out of Congress, which reminds me of Pelosi's orchestration of this garbage impeachment she passed out gold pens to her palsy walsies, and I hope I never see that heinously horrible traitor hit the gavel she doesn't deserve to be beaten with again.Honey...take a step back.
This is a sickness
thefederalist.com
The Democrat Press is nothing but a front for initiating Communism in America as the #1 rule of law. You can't even get on a pulpit and criticize Democrats in Congress, because Nancy Pelosi and her gang of evildoers inserted a very curious law into their last 2-reams of paper law which states the Criticism of Congress is against their fruitcake law. Who will save us from the Democrat Congress after all their enemies (people who are against the communist law they foisted upon American citizens one and all that they cannot speak freely on the pulpit about any misdeed they think the Communist Congress has done against the First Amendment. Or should I say, "What First Amendment?"
5 Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel RevelationsThe Durham deniers’ talking points remain gibberish. They are furiously attempting to hand-wave away the facts the special counsel has found.18 Feb 2022 ~~ By Margot Cleveland5 Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel Revelations
The Durham deniers’ talking points remain gibberish. They are furiously attempting to hand-wave away the facts the special counsel has found.
One week ago today, Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion in the government’s criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. That motion, in requesting the court obtain Sussmann’s waiver of any conflicts of interest held by his lawyers on the record, provided in excruciating detail the factual basis for the purported conflicts.
In doing so, it revealed that “enemies of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge.”
While earlier filings by Durham had revealed equally explosive facts, this time the special counsel’s motion generated enough attention that #Durham began to trend on Twitter. Not since the special counsel’s office indicted Sussmann in September 2021 for lying to the FBI’s former general counsel, James Baker, has the Durham investigation forced itself into the legacy press’ purview.
Rather than report on the latest developments, the corrupt media spun Friday’s filing as a big nothingburger, while parading several false narratives—just as it did when news of the indictment of the Clinton campaign’s lawyer broke.
~Snip~
1. It’s Just Those Crazy Right-Wingers
In his opening salvo in the Sussmann counter-offensive, Savage began his New York Times column by noting that Durham’s Friday night filing “set off a furor among right-wing outlets about purported spying on former President Donald J. Trump.”
2. Pay No Attention to the Facts Behind the Filing
The second narrative pushed by Savage and then quickly parroted by his ilk is that the facts behind Durham’s most recent court filing are too dense for readers to bother using their brainpower to decipher. Yes, I am serious.
3. There Was No ‘Infiltration,’ So There Is No Story
A third counter pushed in response to Durham’s Friday court filing focused on Fox News’ coverage and its opener that read, “Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to ‘infiltrate’ servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an ‘inference’ and ‘narrative’ to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham found.”
4. But Trump Wasn’t Even President Yet
The next narrative launched to minimize the significance of the revelations contained in Durham’s motion focused on the data Sussmann presented to the CIA purporting to show “that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.”
5. It’s Old News
The fifth response, which Savage again initiated, ran that the “news” was “old news.”
Commentary:
Weird how reporters assume it is their job to protect Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrats, Hillary and Joey Xi.
Journalism school taught them well in Progressive Maoist ideology of the Left?
They continue to cover for the PM/DSA Dems and the majority of them never had a good word for Trump.
The Democrat Press is nothing but a front for initiating Communism in America as the #1 rule of law. You can't even get on a pulpit and criticize Democrats in Congress, because Nancy Pelosi and her gang of evildoers inserted a very curious law into their last 2-reams of paper law which states the Criticism of Congress is against their fruitcake law. Who will save us from the Democrat Congress after all their enemies (people who are against the communist law they foisted upon American citizens one and all that they cannot speak freely on the pulpit about any misdeed they think the Communist Congress has done against the First Amendment. Or should I say, "What First Amendment?"
and he’ll get it, at the required times…Durham isn’t a Mueller team rogue obamagate lawyer…he’ll turn over the evidence at the required timeEver hear of "discovery"?
Completely legal public information. Information that was NOT public was obtained by Joffe while working fo the OBAMA Admin and it was NOT regarding Trump but rather the O AdminIn doing so, it revealed that “enemies of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge.”
Which was the point
Outta the park, Doc 7505. This took years in the making for intelligent people to figure out. It was very complex, and the Hillary Deep Staters made sure everyone doubted it in the Media with rampant and abundant lies. I don't think it's her lawyer's fault, because Hillary is a lawyer. I think the lawyer at fault here was Hillary, and she conceived an avenue out for herself and anyone willing to fall on their sword for her sorry behaviors. Disgusting that it took 6 years to unwind all those lies, and I am so relieved that finally, the naysayers here and elsewhere in DemmieWunderLand bounced lies as though they were balloons of success at a celebration. I'm relieved that it's over.
5 Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel RevelationsThe Durham deniers’ talking points remain gibberish. They are furiously attempting to hand-wave away the facts the special counsel has found.18 Feb 2022 ~~ By Margot Cleveland5 Media Lies About The Latest Special Counsel Revelations
The Durham deniers’ talking points remain gibberish. They are furiously attempting to hand-wave away the facts the special counsel has found.
One week ago today, Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion in the government’s criminal case against former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann. That motion, in requesting the court obtain Sussmann’s waiver of any conflicts of interest held by his lawyers on the record, provided in excruciating detail the factual basis for the purported conflicts.
In doing so, it revealed that “enemies of Donald Trump surveilled the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge.”
While earlier filings by Durham had revealed equally explosive facts, this time the special counsel’s motion generated enough attention that #Durham began to trend on Twitter. Not since the special counsel’s office indicted Sussmann in September 2021 for lying to the FBI’s former general counsel, James Baker, has the Durham investigation forced itself into the legacy press’ purview.
Rather than report on the latest developments, the corrupt media spun Friday’s filing as a big nothingburger, while parading several false narratives—just as it did when news of the indictment of the Clinton campaign’s lawyer broke.
~Snip~
1. It’s Just Those Crazy Right-Wingers
In his opening salvo in the Sussmann counter-offensive, Savage began his New York Times column by noting that Durham’s Friday night filing “set off a furor among right-wing outlets about purported spying on former President Donald J. Trump.”
2. Pay No Attention to the Facts Behind the Filing
The second narrative pushed by Savage and then quickly parroted by his ilk is that the facts behind Durham’s most recent court filing are too dense for readers to bother using their brainpower to decipher. Yes, I am serious.
3. There Was No ‘Infiltration,’ So There Is No Story
A third counter pushed in response to Durham’s Friday court filing focused on Fox News’ coverage and its opener that read, “Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to ‘infiltrate’ servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an ‘inference’ and ‘narrative’ to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham found.”
4. But Trump Wasn’t Even President Yet
The next narrative launched to minimize the significance of the revelations contained in Durham’s motion focused on the data Sussmann presented to the CIA purporting to show “that Russian-made smartphones, called YotaPhones, had been connecting to networks at Trump Tower and the White House, among other places.”
5. It’s Old News
The fifth response, which Savage again initiated, ran that the “news” was “old news.”
Commentary:
Weird how reporters assume it is their job to protect Progressive Maoist/DSA Democrats, Hillary and Joey Xi.
Journalism school taught them well in Progressive Maoist ideology of the Left?
They continue to cover for the PM/DSA Dems and the majority of them never had a good word for Trump.
www.cnn.com
??? Is that your best shot? I don't visit places that carry tabloids since Elvis' remains were dug up to make certain he wasn't on a flying saucer, headed to all points of the universe but here.
Someone got their talking points telling them to parrot the lefty “fact” checkers.A new HDS variant apparently emerged last week when special counsel John Durham, who has been investigating the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia probe, filed a motion involving Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign who has been charged with lying to the FBI. (Sussmann has pleaded not guilty, and his case is headed for trial later this year.)
Durham's 13-page motion addressed a possible conflict of interest regarding Sussmann's legal counsel, but some on the right interpreted the document as revealing something more sinister about Clinton
After seizing upon details about Sussman sharing internet data with the CIA in 2017, right-wing activists, Fox News reporters and former President Donald Trump himself all blasted out allegations that the Clinton campaign and its lawyers "worked to 'infiltrate' Trump Tower and White House servers," as former Trump administration aide Kash Patel told Fox
Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tweeted, "They didn't just spy on Donald Trump's campaign. They spied on Donald Trump as sitting President of the United States." Trump claimed that the motion "provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign." He added, "in a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death."
'Hillary Clinton Derangement Syndrome' is worse than ever | CNN
There's something infecting right-wing circles, and it's showing no sign of letting up: a fixation on Hillary Clinton that I'm calling"Hillary Clinton Derangement Syndrome," or "HDS" for short.
These are all obvious cases of HDS, because the filing, in fact, proves no such thing. As various fact-checkers have confirmed, the allegations shared by right-leaning outlets aren't based on reality; the Durham motion doesn't even include the word "infiltrate." But a classic symptom of HDS is hallucinations about what Clinton is doing.
Schiff, Nadler, and Clinton are called on the carpet by a Senator for "spying."
I hope they go down as they deserve.
It's about time!!!
Bet she's already on a jet to an obscure Pacific Island. Think Bill will follow? (...no...)
