Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

There is no way that Hillary is going to jail for anything. Even if a smoking gun is found, the prosecutor will simply advise that she didn't KNOW that she had broken the law and therefore is completely innocent of all charges.
 
The Neo-GOP is as corrupt as the Strong Arm attempt to smear Joe Biden they acquitted the Trumpyberra on.

That senator should be sued for slander, but knows he can't be, that's why he can spew any lie he wants.
they spied and they lied
 

Durham Accused Of Stoking Trumpy Conspiracy Theories In Blistering Counterattack By Target Of His Probe​


Durham did not specify in the filing under what administration the alleged “gathering” by the tech executive — identified by the New York Times and others as Rodney Joffe — took place. But the narrative seemed to tee up a conclusion that conservative outlets quickly leapt to: that the White House had been monitored during the Trump administration.

This led to an outpouring of rage on the right, which cast the filing as proof that Trump was right about the spying allegations all along.

Kash Patel, the former Devin Nunes operative, said that Durham had revealed a plan to “infiltrate” Trump Tower and the White House. Fox News used that quote to headline an article claiming that the filing demonstrated that the Clinton campaign masterminded the effort.

Per Sussmann’s and Joffe’s attorneys, that is not true.

“The Special Counsel is well aware that the data provided to Agency-2 pertained only to the period of time before Mr. Trump took office, when Barack Obama was President,” reads the filing from Sussmann. (Agency-2 is widely reported to be the CIA, to which Durham alleged Sussmann relayed Joffe’s findings.)

Joffe’s attorneys separately told the New York Times that Joffe only examined data from the Executive Office of the President while Obama was in office, and that it was part of an attempt to see whether there was malware on White House servers — a job for which he had been hired.

Sussmann’s attorneys added that Durham didn’t allege anything to do with the supposed spying scheme in the initial indictment, and questioned how it was relevant to the case.

“Sadly, the Special Counsel seems to be succeeding in his effort to instigate unfair and prejudicial media coverage of Mr. Sussmann’s case,” the filing reads. “Indeed, since the Motion was filed, numerous outlets published stories suggesting that the Special Counsel’s latest filing revealed a vast conspiracy involving Mr. Sussmann and the Clinton Campaign.”

Now just a minute. Durham, the guy Billy the Bagman picked to discredit the FBI's investigation for the Orange Messiah's sake, is doing Trumpy things!! Perish the thought.
The crooks deny they broke the laws they were caught breaking. News at 11....
 

Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

12 Feb 2022 ~~ By Cristina Laila
A new filing from Special Counsel John Durham reveals Perkins Coie allies connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign spied on Trump’s internet traffic – WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT.
As previously reported, Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted last September for lying to the FBI.

More from Techno Fog on Durham’s new filing:



Commentary:
There is substantial evidence that Perkins Coie has been used by Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats to fix and obfuscate DNC illegal actions dating back decades.
Is anybody actually shocked by this? This is what lying, corruption, seditious and traitorous actors do when they know they rarely face any consequences.
The entire federal system has been subverted to work exclusively for the PM/DSA Democrat Commie minions.
Our judiciary has become a coin toss- tails they win and heads we lose
Identifying Perkins Coie LLC as a den of Democrat Socialist Marxist activists is an understatement. It's common knowledge that Soros has given the group millions.
Sussman and Elias are not the only members of Perkins Coie that has been involved in the corrupt actions of Perkins Coie. It's the whole group of attorneys.
Simply, all the proof and documentation in the world exposing PMS/DSA Democrat Leftist scheming, lying, cheating, just does not matter. Democrats are above the law...it's been proven over and over.

**********​

‘There’s something infecting right-wing circles, and it’s showing no sign of letting up: a fixation on Hillary Clinton that I’m calling”Hillary Clinton Derangement Syndrome,” or “HDS” for short.

The symptoms of this persistent ailment include an unhealthy obsession with the former secretary of state – from spreading lies about her past actions to blaming her for events with which she has no connection – combined with an insatiable longing to see her run for president again in 2024.

A new HDS variant apparently emerged last week when special counsel John Durham, who has been investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe, filed a motion involving Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign who has been charged with lying to the FBI. (Sussmann has pleaded not guilty, and his case is headed for trial later this year.)

Durham’s 13-page motion addressed a possible conflict of interest regarding Sussmann’s legal counsel, but some on the right interpreted the document as revealing something more sinister about Clinton.

After seizing upon details about Sussman sharing internet data with the CIA in 2017, right-wing activists, Fox News reporters and former President Donald Trump himself all blasted out allegations that the Clinton campaign and its lawyers “worked to ‘infiltrate’ Trump Tower and White House servers,” as former Trump administration aide Kash Patel told Fox News.

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tweeted, “They didn’t just spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. They spied on Donald Trump as sitting President of the United States.” Trump claimed that the motion “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign.” He added, “in a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death.”

These are all obvious cases of HDS, because the filing, in fact, proves no such thing. As various fact-checkers have confirmed, the allegations shared by right-leaning outlets aren’t based on reality; the Durham motion doesn’t even include the word “infiltrate.” But a classic symptom of HDS is hallucinations about what Clinton is doing.’


Exactly.
 
This is what happens when disinformation goes unchallenged.

None of what you said comes close to reflecting reality.
Just STFU you proven lying quack. Just because you’re a proven lying asshole, doesn’t mean everybody will just accept your lies. Keep playing the ostrich. It suits you.
 
The 'facts' are that Barr shut down obstruction of justice charges. Not Mueller. And that when Barr tried to claim that the Mueller report 'exonerated' Trump, Mueller publicly contradicted Barr, insisting that Trump was no exonerated. The 'facts' are the Barr disagreed with Mueller's legal analysis of obstruction of justice charges.

There was plenty laid out in the Mueller report to levy charges. Barr chose not to.

So much for your claim that it was just 'emotetards' jumping on nothing. Mueller was clear that the Mueller report didn't exonerate Trump. You just ignored Mueller on his own report.....and replaced it with OANN told you to think.
No, there was no obstruction to charge. Mule-er didn’t even know what was in his own report. Mule-er didn't exonerate Trump? Not his job. He had 2 choices. Charge or not. He couldn’t charge because he had nothing. He would have been laughed out of court and likely (deservedly and finally) disbarred. You just ignore reality and parrot what CNN tells you to say today.
 
‘There’s something infecting right-wing circles, and it’s showing no sign of letting up: a fixation on Hillary Clinton that I’m calling”Hillary Clinton Derangement Syndrome,” or “HDS” for short.

The symptoms of this persistent ailment include an unhealthy obsession with the former secretary of state – from spreading lies about her past actions to blaming her for events with which she has no connection – combined with an insatiable longing to see her run for president again in 2024.

A new HDS variant apparently emerged last week when special counsel John Durham, who has been investigating the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia probe, filed a motion involving Michael Sussmann, a lawyer with ties to Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign who has been charged with lying to the FBI. (Sussmann has pleaded not guilty, and his case is headed for trial later this year.)

Durham’s 13-page motion addressed a possible conflict of interest regarding Sussmann’s legal counsel, but some on the right interpreted the document as revealing something more sinister about Clinton.

After seizing upon details about Sussman sharing internet data with the CIA in 2017, right-wing activists, Fox News reporters and former President Donald Trump himself all blasted out allegations that the Clinton campaign and its lawyers “worked to ‘infiltrate’ Trump Tower and White House servers,” as former Trump administration aide Kash Patel told Fox News.

Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tweeted, “They didn’t just spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. They spied on Donald Trump as sitting President of the United States.” Trump claimed that the motion “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign.” He added, “in a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death.”

These are all obvious cases of HDS, because the filing, in fact, proves no such thing. As various fact-checkers have confirmed, the allegations shared by right-leaning outlets aren’t based on reality; the Durham motion doesn’t even include the word “infiltrate.” But a classic symptom of HDS is hallucinations about what Clinton is doing.’


Exactly.
~~~~~~
Indeed, coming from a gasping, circling the bowl Communist News Network..
 

Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

12 Feb 2022 ~~ By Cristina Laila
A new filing from Special Counsel John Durham reveals Perkins Coie allies connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign spied on Trump’s internet traffic – WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT.
As previously reported, Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was indicted last September for lying to the FBI.

More from Techno Fog on Durham’s new filing:



Commentary:
There is substantial evidence that Perkins Coie has been used by Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats to fix and obfuscate DNC illegal actions dating back decades.
Is anybody actually shocked by this? This is what lying, corruption, seditious and traitorous actors do when they know they rarely face any consequences.
The entire federal system has been subverted to work exclusively for the PM/DSA Democrat Commie minions.
Our judiciary has become a coin toss- tails they win and heads we lose
Identifying Perkins Coie LLC as a den of Democrat Socialist Marxist activists is an understatement. It's common knowledge that Soros has given the group millions.
Sussman and Elias are not the only members of Perkins Coie that has been involved in the corrupt actions of Perkins Coie. It's the whole group of attorneys.
Simply, all the proof and documentation in the world exposing PMS/DSA Democrat Leftist scheming, lying, cheating, just does not matter. Democrats are above the law...it's been proven over and over.

**********​

Nope, Durham didn’t.


You just continue to suffer from HCDS.
 
Talk about dumbing down your audience. After years of spoonfeeding liberal lies and delusions to its readership, the New York Times has had to admit it can’t serve up a portion of real news because its readers might find the facts a little hard on their sensitive digestive systems.

The accusations filed in motions by special counsel John Durham in his investigation of the Obama administration’s Russia probe essentially are just too much work for Times readers to digest

:auiqs.jpg:

Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track - New York Times​

 
Talk about dumbing down your audience. After years of spoonfeeding liberal lies and delusions to its readership, the New York Times has had to admit it can’t serve up a portion of real news because its readers might find the facts a little hard on their sensitive digestive systems.



:auiqs.jpg:

Court Filing Started a Furor in Right-Wing Outlets, but Their Narrative Is Off Track - New York Times​

This post proves nothing and it is nothing.


If you have a problem with actual reporting please retreat to your silo and assume the fetal position.
 

Forum List

Back
Top