Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

[Abatis]

Mueller tracked the data.

Only one entity has ever had the opportunity to examine the DNC's servers (actually mirrors) The DOJ/FBI has never been granted any access to the physical servers or the mirrors, all the government possesses are the (three?) redacted "draft" reports issued by Crowdstrike. See government's reply to Roger Stone's discovery request for the unredacted reports:

https://archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.dcd.203583/gov.uscourts.dcd.203583.123.0.pdf

But I mean, seriously. Your criticism is that they never saw the data leaving the server? We know it left the server. How else would have it landed on Wikileaks?

The most common alternate theory is the data was transferred to removable media by someone with access to the server.

Questions about the quality of Crowdstike's work are not new:

New questions over cyber experts' claim Russia hacked the election

CrowdStrike concluded in June 2016 that Vladimir Putin's spies had hacked the DNC, a claim repeated by the FBI and CIA. But DailyMail.com can reveal questions over its methods and accuracy.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Abatis]

You're talking about data being "exfiltrated" from the DNC servers by RUSSIANS

WTF

Not following your question / statement.

The word "exfiltrated" is not MY word, it's the word used by the President of Crowdstike to describe the action of removing data from a server.

Open up the link to Shawn Henry's testimony and do a search for "exfiltrate(d)"; he uses it 17 times in his testimony.

https://intelligence.house.gov/UploadedFiles/SH21.pdf

All I'm doing is posting the DNC "hack" story line offered by Crowdsrike.

WTF is your issue with the word "exfiltrate"?

 

[Abatis]

The forensic copy of the hard drives as well as a snap shot of the CPU memory prior to the shut down and clean up of the network was provided to the FBI. If I recall.

I would like to see this verified / substantiated.

If true, it sounds like Stone was denied discovery.

 

[Not a Monkeys Uncle]

 

[Lesh]

Not following your question / statement.

The word "exfiltrated" is not MY word, it's the word used by the President of Crowdstike to describe the action of removing data from a server.

Open up the link to Shawn Henry's testimony and do a search for "exfiltrate(d)"; he uses it 17 times in his testimony.

https://intelligence.house.gov/UploadedFiles/SH21.pdf

All I'm doing is posting the DNC "hack" story line offered by Crowdsrike.

WTF is your issue with the word "exfiltrate"?

What does Russian hacking of the DNC servers have to do with Sussman or Durham?

Nothing?

Oh

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Durham has really made a fool of himself. He can partially thank Bill Barr for that.

That's your best defense - I guess

 

[colfax_m]

Only one entity has ever had the opportunity to examine the DNC's servers (actually mirrors) The DOJ/FBI has never been granted any access to the physical servers or the mirrors, all the government possesses are the (three?) redacted "draft" reports issued by Crowdstrike. See government's reply to Roger Stone's discovery request for the unredacted reports:

The DoJ was given forensic copies. The DoJ was able to track data exfiltration because they had access to a broader range of logs than CrowdStrike did and their analysis was the same, that the DNC was hacked by the GRU. The physical hardware is not particularly relevant and did not prevent the DoJ to finding enough evidence to prove it was Russians.

Roger Stone was requesting unredacted reports from CrowdStrike, which he had no reason to request in the first place, and the DoJ responded that they don't have unredacted reports. That didn't prevent the DoJ from finding proof that they were hacked by the GRU either.

CrowdStrike was right about Russians hacking Ukrainian artillery. The only error was saying how much of the artillery was affected. Not exactly as big of a scandal as you make it seem.


The alternate theory is that they were physically downloaded by someone on site has zero evidence to support such allegations as compared to the mountain of evidence that it was the GRU. Yet people like yourself continue to believe the Russian disinformation campaign which sought to deflect blame from themselves.

 

[Nostra]

Sussmann has requested that Durham identify who he is alleging Sussmann was coordinating with in the Clinton campaign.

Durham has not been able to identify anyone. Furthermore, Durham didn't even interview anyone in the Clinton campaign until 2 months after Sussmann was indicted.

The indictment against Sussmann is half baked. It purports to have evidence of a conspiracy, however it cannot tell us who is engaged in the conspiracy. Saying it wsa with "the Clinton campaign" is not sufficient. One cannot call the "Clinton campaign" to the stand as part of his defense. We need a name. Durham has none.

Durham is under no obligation to give that info to Sussman. He will use what he has at the trial.

You have no clue what he has, despite claiming you do.

 

[Lesh]

Durham is under no obligation to give that info to Sussman. He will use what he has at the trial.

Ever hear of "discovery"?

 

[colfax_m]

Durham is under no obligation to give that info to Sussman. He will use what he has at the trial.

You have no clue what he has, despite claiming you do.

Sussmann is entitled to know what he is being accused of. Otherwise the prosecution is depriving him of his ability to formulate a defense.

You would rather the government act in a fascist manner. That’s typical of you.

 

[Nostra]

Sussmann is entitled to know what he is being accused of. Otherwise the prosecution is depriving him of his ability to formulate a defense.

You would rather the government act in a fascist manner. That’s typical of you.

Hie charges are in the indictment, Moron.

 

[BlindBoo]

I would like to see this verified / substantiated.

If true, it sounds like Stone was denied discovery.

They were virtual machines which make the point about never physically examining the computers moot. Cloudstike never had the phyical machines either.


"The FBI never took physical hold of the DNC’s computer system. Instead, it reviewed a wide range of computer forensic evidence provided by CrowdStrike, which is common practice in such investigations.

“With regards to our investigation of the DNC hack in 2016, we provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI,” the firm said in an emailed statement to The Associated Press. “As we’ve stated before, we stand by our findings and conclusions that have been fully supported by the US intelligence community.”

“Just making a verified, hardware-level copy of all the bits, all the data that’s stored on the system is sufficient for almost all investigations that would have to be conducted,” said Spafford, who has assisted the FBI in cases.

FBI reviewed cybersecurity firm’s evidence in 2016 DNC election hack

Social media posts are wrongly claiming that the FBI failed to review evidence in the hack of the DNC’s computer network before concluding that Russia was responsible for the breach.

apnews.com

 

[Doc7505]

Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussman has pleaded not guilty.

The indictment against Sussman says he told then-FBI General Counsel James Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the 2016 presidential election, that he was not doing work "for any client" when he requested and held a meeting in which he presented "purported data and 'white papers' that allegedly demonstrated a covert communications channel" between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties to the Kremlin.

But Durham's filing on Feb. 11, in a section titled "Factual Background," reveals that Sussman "had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign."

Durham’s filing said Sussman’s "billing records reflect" that he "repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations."....................

~~~~~~
Who is Lisa Hook and did this Obama appointee the spy within the Trump Administration part of the cabal to overthrow this government?
Why are those in government now so intent on stopping this investigation?

EXCLUSIVE: Lisa Hook, the Former CEO of Neustar, the Firm Named in Recent Hillary Spying Activities, Ironically Was Also an Obama Appointee to His National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

Lisa Hook was the CEO of Neustar, the firm that is now in the news for having been involved in Hillary’s spying on candidate and President Trump. Ms.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

**********​

The Gateway Pundit

Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback

www.thegatewaypundit.com

**********​

The Gateway Pundit

Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback

www.thegatewaypundit.com

How soon before, by order of Biden, DOJ Attorney General Merrick Garland closes the investigation that Robert Durham has been investigating more than 4 years?
To save America the "investigators" must stop being afraid to touch Obama and go after his many crimes. From Obama others will soon fall, all the way up to Soros and down to Hillary and to the RINOS of the Republican party. The truth is never exposed because those looking for the truth have been complicit in The Obama Fraud and protecting what is most important.........themselves.
Will Durham, finally, be different?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

All it means is when their proprietary software was monitoring all the ports in real time there was no unauthorized data transfers. The forensic copy of the hard drives as well as a snap shot of the CPU memory prior to the shut down and clean up of the network was provided to the FBI. If I recall.

The forensic copy of the hard drives as well as a snap shot of the CPU memory prior to the shut down and clean up of the network was provided to the FBI.

Yeah, yeah! That's the ticket!

 

[BlindBoo]

The forensic copy of the hard drives as well as a snap shot of the CPU memory prior to the shut down and clean up of the network was provided to the FBI.

Yeah, yeah! That's the ticket!

Sorry Skippy, it's old news.

 

[beautress]

Clinton and the Democrat Party Conspired to spy on President Trump, and it was a 100% Criminal Conspiracy.


​

 

[beautress]

The Greatest Scandal In American History.
​

 

[surada]

This is maybe The Biggest piece of the Russian Collusion
puzzle yet.U.S. Attorney John Durham has just reported
findings about recently Indicted Clinton Lawyer Michael
Sussmann who is charged with lying to the FBI about is role
in Fabricating the Russian Collusion hoax.
He may have been part of a conspiracy to INFILTRATE
Trump Tower and mine data { Using name Georgia Tech } to
spy on Trump.DARPA was used at a University by the same name.
Breitbart Header :
Durham Bombshell : Clinton Operatives
Spied on Trump

Trump Reacts to John Durham Spying Allegations: Worse than Watergate

Trump called the Durham revelations worse than Watergate, and implied that the Clinton operatives allegedly involved committed treason.

www.breitbart.com

Fox news has parsed the story. Durham has already walked it back.

 

[beautress]

The truth is getting harder to ignore for Democrats. Sorry you were fooled by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and many, many more:

​

 

[beautress]

Fox news has parsed the story. Durham has already walked it back.

Clinton should be assigned to a women's prison until her trial is completed. And she shouldn't ever, ever get out of it again. Nancy Pelosi should be assigned to a different criminal incarceration unit for her orchestrating the crimes against the House of "Representatives, The Senate, The Executive Branch, the November 3, 2020 election precincts, but worst of all, The American People.

Durham has not backed down. He presented the evidence. It is 100% backed up by the trail of criminality.

One more viewpoint:

The Clinton Machine Spied Illegally According to the Constitution of the United States of america.

​