Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

The Page warrant led nowhere and the Mueller investigation had basically nothing to do with it. Everything you complain about would have happened if Page had never had a FISA warrant against him

The lies told to the FBI by Trump’s people directly led to the Mueller investigation as they continued to pursue Russian collusion given how suspicious it is for people to be lying about their connections.

So you see, reality is actually the exact opposite of what you claim.

Go ahead and charge Strzok with something if you think he did something so egregious.

Page shouldn’t have had a warrant against him in the first place. The Clinton campaign and Obama played a large role in how this all unfolded.

Yeah, I know, you Google search puts MSNBC and all the usual suspects on the front page. There was quite a bit of blame to go around for the fake Russian collusion narrative and it was very much political.

PAGE: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

STRZOK: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.

I honestly don’t see how anyone can’t see this as very damning considering Strzok’s positioin in the FBI and how the investigation unfolded.

Adam Schiff, Steele dossier and the death of shame in American politics
 
And neither did he dossier

What we do know is that the fake dossier was part of the submission to the FISA court. We also know that the FISA court expressed concerns that they were misled regarding the know origins of this reports…namely that it was funded by a political rival. What we also know is that they most certainly believed they had to submit the dossier to the FISA court to obtain the warrant, otherwise, why risk it? They clearly didn’t feel as though they had enough evidence otherwise.

You have been fooled by the MSM that spoon feeds misinformation. Think for yourself.
 
What we do know is that the fake dossier was part of the submission to the FISA court. We also know that the FISA court expressed concerns that they were misled regarding the know origins of this reports…namely that it was funded by a political rival. What we also know is that they most certainly believed they had to submit the dossier to the FISA court to obtain the warrant, otherwise, why risk it? They clearly didn’t feel as though they had enough evidence otherwise.

You have been fooled by the MSM that spoon feeds misinformation. Think for yourself.
Jesus

So let's see. The Carter Page FISA warrant was NOT what began the FBI investigation of the Trump/Russia connections. That began months before with the Papdopolus/Mifsud nonsense

The Alfabank thing had nothing to do with anything. The FBI looked at it and dropped it

So what in the hell are you talking about?
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA
3v3j9hdnxmi81.jpg

Durham was installed into this role by Barr in 2019.
So, why would Barr put a democrat into such a role?
Are you on crack?
First, because justice is not supposed to be partisan. Second, did you know justice should not depend on what party you are in? No, you don't know that. You still don't.
 
:yes_text12:

Crowdstrike said that they saw data stacked and ready to be exfiltrated, but had no concrete evidence any data ever left the server over the internet.
Crowdstrike said that?

Where?

Post a link
 
Crowdstrike said that?

Yup . . .


House Intelligence Committee
Testimony of Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry
December 5, 2017
Page 32

Schiff_Crowdstrike32_DNC_exfiltration.jpg


Post a link


This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the subsequent "Russia hacked the DNC" claims in the Joint Analysis Report and Brennan's Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller witch hunt and all their perfectly tuned choral hack claims; were just based on them accepting a hunch of a hired contractor for the Democrat party.
 
:yes_text12:

Crowdstrike said that they saw data stacked and ready to be exfiltrated, but had no concrete evidence any data ever left the server over the internet.
Mueller tracked the data.

But I mean, seriously. Your criticism is that they never saw the data leaving the server? We know it left the server. How else would have it landed on Wikileaks?
 
Yup . . .



House Intelligence Committee
Testimony of Crowdstrike President Shawn Henry
December 5, 2017
Page 32

View attachment 603776




This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the subsequent "Russia hacked the DNC" claims in the Joint Analysis Report and Brennan's Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller witch hunt and all their perfectly tuned choral hack claims; were just based on them accepting a hunch of a hired contractor for the Democrat party.
You're talking about data being "exfiltrated" from the DNC servers by RUSSIANS

WTF
 
You're talking about data being "exfiltrated" from the DNC servers by RUSSIANS

WTF
All it means is when their proprietary software was monitoring all the ports in real time there was no unauthorized data transfers. The forensic copy of the hard drives as well as a snap shot of the CPU memory prior to the shut down and clean up of the network was provided to the FBI. If I recall.
 

Forum List

Back
Top