Do Natural Rights Actually Exist?

Liberals? Like all those liberal churches and synagogues?


It's not all that important. We all (most people) demand and fight for rights. Like my forebears and the MAGNA CARTA thing. It matters because WE the people made it happen. The King, the Sovereign was said to have that silly god on his side.
You seem to be completely missing the point. Inalienable rights are just what we start with, before we ever interact with other people. They were just trying to establish the level of freedom any human has by default. A baseline. That's all. The question of which rights government protects, or is prohibited from violating, is an entirely different matter.

Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government was not above the law. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself.

yep.
 
Last edited:
Oh the irony.

You couldn't look smart even if you knew what you were talking about. Which you rarely do.
santos gobble 2.jpg
 
You seem to be completely missing the point. Inalienable rights are just what we start with, before we ever interact with other people. They were just trying to establish the level of freedom any human has be default. A baseline. That's all. The question of which rights government protects, or is prohibited from violating, is an entirely different matter.



yep.
Nope. Before we ever interact with other people? When was this? In Africa? When our ancestors traveled out of Africa? You do believe in science, don't you?

When was man ever born alone and free? Was it virgin births with a mother deserting a baby? Think. Think it through.

Does a baby had a fully developed brain?
 
Nope. Before we ever interact with other people? When was this? In Africa? When our ancestors traveled out of Africa? You do believe in science, don't you?

When was man ever born alone and free? Was it virgin births with a mother deserting a baby? Think. Think it through.

Does a baby had a fully developed brain?
It's a hypothetical. But, you know - nevermind. You seem to have some kind of agenda, and I wouldn't want to interfere.
 
Nope. Before we ever interact with other people? When was this? In Africa? When our ancestors traveled out of Africa? You do believe in science, don't you?

When was man ever born alone and free? Was it virgin births with a mother deserting a baby? Think. Think it through.

Does a baby had a fully developed brain?

I could laugh sarcastically about how you use the word "sciene", ignorant. But I do not do so. Extremely short: Believers in science are not scientists. A real scientist doubts what we know. But one thing in this context here is totally clear. Under normal living conditions, a woman's fertilized egg cell becomes something more than just a brain in a utopian bottle. The egg cell will become a human being - but it takes a whole village to raise a human being. No women left alone. No men who don't take responsibility and win themselve to death.

By the way: Scientific interesting is in this context that women could be indeed an own species without men. Men are not necessary for the fertilization of an egg. Somehow the sentence "When God created man, she only practiced" has a good grain of truth.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top