Unification
Member
- Aug 5, 2018
- 225
- 7
- Thread starter
- #41
Apples to oranges - this proposal not being about making sodomy illegal, that be separate issue and unrelated - but this is merely to create legislation to affirm that same-sex union are not "equal" to straight unions, since former is deluded notion.Reality is that freedom is a right only for religious or spiritual people, since only people who are above moral degenerates which lead to suffering are capable of appreciating freeness.Easy way to do this, is to create a new state law allowing a superior version of "marriage" only for non-sodomite couples with special rights which sodomite marriage does not get, such as better tax benefits or subsides to help with natural procreation of children.
Then straight-only marriage becomes the new defacto from of "marriage", while the inferior form of marriage which open to sodomite lifestyle becomes reduced to the new "civil union", and its inequality is affirmed by the state in law.
If we do this, most likely if lawsuit was filed against it, and it made its way to Supreme Court, the Supreme Court would rule in favor of it as Constitutional within the bounds of the 14th Amendment, much as they ruled in favor of the Baker in the recent case.
Then sodomite marriage "equality" would be eliminated and go away like it never existed, and the only way to change it at this point would be to repeal the entire 14th Amendment itself... and good luck with that.
So this should be idea that states get on board with, he he
Why do you hate freedom?
If individuals reject reality of God or higher power, then they are too un-enlightened to understand freedom, so they settle for beastly pleasures such as addiction to sodomy, drunkness, and gluttony - which lead not to freedom, but to living as feral beast in zoo cage.
How free is obese person who become 600 lbs overweight as result of lifestyle of gluttony? He cannot even move his own left-leg without straining himself, so not very "free" is he? Ha ha.
So altrusitic thing would be for the spiritual people to educate the immoral into changing their hamful lifestyle practices, so they can enjoy spiritual freedom rather than suffering and damnation, no?
The facts are being able to marry either sex is more freedom than just being able to marry the opposite sex.
And why do you care ? It doesn’t effect you.
Look, I think neck tattoos are terrible. I wouldn’t get one . But I don’t think they should be illegal .
It be like saying that putting to sockets, or two electircal plugs together is a 'circuit, but that is oxymoron - circuit requires one socket and one electrical plug or else it is not a circuit to begin with, so of course two men or two women is not a "marriage" either.