Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was 7.8% and going up like crazy... It turned around at 10.3 in October and then 80 straight months of growth. Same growth as under Trump basically, super dupe. The point is every time the GOP gets in they have a corrupt bubble and bust. C 1929 1989 2008 under Trump too if he gets 8 years.When MaObama took office, unemployment was in the 7% range. After he passed his unconstitutional “Stimulus Packages”, unemployment topped off at over 10%. Only an idiot leftist would attempt to declare that that is doing an “amazing” job.He did an amazing job and you are a brainwashed hater dupe functional GOP moron.That’s a bargain compared to MaObama who spent $10 trillion and made the economy exponentially worse.what you're saying is the trumps economy got just a little tiny bit better than Obama's. Only cost two trillion dollars in debt.
Uh-oh...we just caught mammaries in another lie
First she said Carter created more jobs, but now she says job “rate”.
And thank God any buffoon can go back and look. If only your dumb ass had before making that ignorant post right there. Here you are in post #112:No, I didn't. That's another outright lie on your part. Given that people can go back and look at posts, it's interesting that you're willing to lie so boldly.First she said Carter created more jobs, but now she says job “rate”.
Word-for-word. Unedited. The word “rate” was not used. Not only caught mammaries in a lie, but then caught her lying about her lie!The funniest part was how he got so triggered by a simple fact, that Carter's job creation record was better than Reagan's.
You’re an idiot to the extent that you constantly use terms that you’re clueless about and you’re ignorant of basic economics. Please stop trolling. You’re having absolutely no effect here whatsoever. All you’re doing is annoying people.economic inequality is a drag on our economy to the extent our social services are not market friendly.
nothing but right wing propaganda and rhetoric.You’re an idiot to the extent that you constantly use terms that you’re clueless about and you’re ignorant of basic economics. Please stop trolling. You’re having absolutely no effect here whatsoever. All you’re doing is annoying people.economic inequality is a drag on our economy to the extent our social services are not market friendly.
The simple solution is to end the unconstitutional social services and restore the free market so that the economy thrives and people don’t need idiotic social services.
Thanks to failed left-wing policies for years and years. What happened to workers in Seattle after the $15 minimum wage went into effect? Wages fell. Why? Many were laid off. Those that weren't had their hours drastically reduced. They ended up going home with less than they did before the increase. That's a fact that comes directly from a University of Washington study (a left-wing institution).You can do all of that...problem is wages have been falling behind for years and years.
You know the simple solution to that? Start your own corporation. It's fall down hilarious listening to the left whine all day about how corporations treat people - but none of them ever start a corporation, treat people wonderful, and show the rest of them how it's done.I don't trust American corporations to be decent in that respect.
)Providing for the general welfare is a General power not a Common power.Nobody is entitled to the fruits of my labor just because they are alive.
If Democracy allows the majority to use the government to steal from the minority then Democrat is a shit form of government.
Unfortunately our Bill of Rights in our Republic is not strong enough to stop the thievery of government with our bloated welfare state. Too many damn Liberals in office that ignore individual rights and Liberties.
That is why the structural problems of this country can't be fixed at the ballot box.
To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
And thank God any buffoon can go back and look. If only your dumb ass had before making that ignorant post right there. Here you are in post #112:
The funniest part was how he got so triggered by a simple fact, that Carter's job creation record was better than Reagan's.
yet, the right wing wants to put the federal government in charge of walls and immigration.To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
Hence the Failureyet, the right wing wants to put the federal government in charge of walls and immigration.To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
I disagree, Flash. If what you are saying were even remotely true, Hitlery Clinton would be sitting in the Oval Office this evening and Merrick Garland would be sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court.That is why the structural problems of this country can't be fixed at the ballot box.
I disagree, Flash. If what you are saying were even remotely true, Hitlery Clinton would be sitting in the Oval Office this evening and Merrick Garland would be sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court.That is why the structural problems of this country can't be fixed at the ballot box.
Instead, Donald Trump sits in the Oval Office this evening and Neil Gorsuch & Brett Kavanaugh sit on the U.S. Supreme Court.
The ballot box got it done in a big way. Are we golden? Absolutely not. The left fucked things up so bad - they made an absolute mess of everything. But things are MUCH better already and with Trump possibly getting to appoint 3 or 4 justices, things are definitely headed in the right direction.
