'Education' According To The Left.

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
125,093
60,647
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. In March, 2010, the University of California, at Berkeley, hosted the annual Cultural Studies Association Conference. There is no better place to reveal the effects of decades of Leftist indoctrination, and the impending doom of this once great nation.





2. One young faculty member gives a talk in which he criticizes homeowners for "participating in global capitalism." It is filled with plenty of rhetoric about "the hegemony of absolute space," and "ontological security,' and so on. His point: "We have no claim on family property." He goes further:
"When we succumb to pity for an old woman losing her house we abandon social justice." Mark the theme: no individual's monopolistic rights!

a. One can see the effects: the eco-fascists have imposed the same kind of thinking on the environment: " The delusion has led to the sequestration of productive land unmatched since the age of kings. Over 30% of the American land base lies under no-use or limited-use restrictions….almost 700 million acres. The Bureau of Land Management and the Department of the Interior are targeting the confiscation of another 213 million acres, bringing the count to nearly half of the continent!" http://r-calfusa.com/Trade/property_rights/100900BLMLeakedMemo.pdf

b. In 1992, the UN-variety socialist, Maurice Strong, announced: “Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class - involving high meat intake, the use of fossil fuels, electrical appliances, home and work-place air-conditioning, and suburban housing - are not sustainable.” (Maurice Strong, opening speech at the 1992 UN Rio Earth Summit)




3. Another young speaker lectures about the iconic 1972 photo of a little girl running naked and terrified from a South Vietnamese napalm attack. She is shocked that the girl, Phan Thị Kim Phúc, has not only forgiven the United States, but is now traveling around the country celebrating American freedom! This incenses the speaker, for whom that old photo conveys such a powerful anti-American message. What happens to the message, she asks, when the girl grows up to do such a terrible thing? Kim Phúc's "loving embrace of America seems a betrayal of the photo." What, she asks, are we "as theorists" to make of the fact that Kim Phúc "appears not to feel anger when we think she should?"

4. Then the author of a paper was entitled "Towards a Green Marxist Cultural Studies: Notes on Value and Human Domination over Nature." What to make of that title, together with the speaker's 'Valley Girl' patois: "Um, I'm like a grad student at UC Davis?" and, since the "critique of capitalism has faded in significance," she's "sort of reviving a Gramscian-style Marxism." She goes on to describe global warming as "sort of like, a crisis, in the human relationship to nature?" and as "a natural result of the human alienation from nature under capitalism." Then, she cites several authorities who speak of "a sort of, like, physical or spatial alienation?"...but adds that she intends to go beyond them.





5. These young people are smart, upper-middle-class kids, with little real-world experience and even less in the way of serious education. One after another of them pronounces with an imperial air of authority on things about which they plainly know next to nothing. Their familiarity with history, literature, philosophy, or any other traditional field of learning is rudimentary at best. What they have is ideology and the jargon to go with it. And they have the arrogance of innocents who have no clue as to have very little they know.
Bawer, "The Victim's Revolution."

a. "The result? Students who develop a suffocating sense of superiority, who pass judgment on authors as racist, sexist, capitalist, imperialist or homophobic before even reading their works. Political correctness is not designed to produce students who think for themselves, but, rather, cadres of self-absorbed reactionaries ready to take their orders from ‘the movement.’"
Pearcey, "Saving Leonardo," chapter eight.


b. One father, a professional film critic, found he could not understand his daughter’s film studies textbook, which was packed with Left-wing buzzwords, including “fibula,” and “syuzhet.” He asked her what they were. “They’re Russian formulist terms for ‘story’ and ‘plot.’”
“Why don’t they use ‘story’ and ‘plot’? “We’re not allowed to. If we do, they take points off our paper.”
From “Lights, Camera, Action. Marxism, Semiotics, Narratology.” Lights, Camera, Action. Marxism, Semiotics, Narratology. - Los Angeles Times





6. “What [American universities] need, and would much benefit from, is more Marxists, radicals, leftists — all terms conventionally applied to those who fight against exploitation, racism, sexism, and capitalism. We can never have too many of these, just as we can never have too few ‘conservatives’.”
- Grover Furr, professor and author of books and articles in Russian and English on Soviet history under the period of Joseph Stalin


In place of education, the Left has substituted politicization.
What they have produced is not a generation of educated thinkers, but a cadre
of robots who take their orders from the movement.
Q.E.D.
 
"Over 30% of the American land base lies under no-use or limited-use restrictions….almost 700 million acres."

What, conservation isn't conservative?
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.
 
Last edited:
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.


Wow....I never spoke to a guy who went to university in the 19th century!
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.


Wow....I never spoke to a guy who went to university in the 19th century!

Which one did you go to?
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.


Wow....I never spoke to a guy who went to university in the 19th century!

Which one did you go to?



Which century?

20th.


Which university?

I'm proud to say that I went to the one with the best fight-song in the nation!
 
"Over 30% of the American land base lies under no-use or limited-use restrictions….almost 700 million acres."

What, conservation isn't conservative?

Confiscation isn't.

Most of that land hasn't been confiscated, having been federal land since its acquisition.



Not even close.



1. TR and Gifford Pinchot did not intend to set aside forests for perpetual pristine preservation. Their conservation was anthropocentric, a very different concept from modern environmentalists. No, their aim was to set aside resources for future development, for profit, and for the benefit of the many: “The greatest good, for the greatest number, for the longest time” (the Utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham).

a. While John Muir fought against dams in Yosemite, TR and Pinchot felt that San Francisco’s need for water took precedence. “With the creation of the National Forest Service within the Department of Agriculture, and with Pinchot as its first director, his view prevailed in Washington: forests would be treated like a crop, not a temple. Pinchot prevailed again when he persuaded President Theodore Roosevelt to allow the construction of the Hetch Hetchy dam in Yosemite, despite Muir's vociferous objections.” The National Parks: America's Best Idea: Historical Figures | PBS


2. TR and Pinchot believed that the first duty of the human race is to control the earth on which we live; nature, they believed, is unable to do the job on its own.” Pinchot was generally opposed to preservation for the sake of wilderness or scenery, a fact perhaps best illustrated by the important support he offered to the damming of Hetch Hetchy Valley in Yosemite National Park.” Gifford Pinchot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


3. The modern iteration, eco-fascism, confiscates and regulates to the degree equivalent to confiscation. Today, the meaning of ‘environmentalism’ has been corrupted. More Left-wing politics than science, it is correctly, if pejoratively, called the “Watermelon Movement:” green on the outside, but red on the inside.


4. An important sidenote: TR left office in what he felt were the capable hands of Taft. But Taft had nowhere near the passion for conservation, and demoted Pinchot. His successor, Ballinger: “Pinchot’s authority was substantially undermined by the election of President William Howard Taft in 1908. Taft later dismissed Pinchot[14] for speaking out against his policies and those of Richard Ballinger, Secretary of the Interior.” Gifford Pinchot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

a. This was the reason for TR’s return to politics, to oppose Republican Taft, and threw the election of 1912 to Democrat/Progressive Woodrow Wilson.
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.


Wow....I never spoke to a guy who went to university in the 19th century!

No, it wasn't the nineteenth century, except for their thinking.
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.

This is possibly the stupidest post I have ever seen on this site.

Let me get this straight...fed confiscation of property is good for private industry and business, and conservation is conservative.

:eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh:

Where on earth were you educated? Did you go past the 8th grade?
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.

This is possibly the stupidest post I have ever seen on this site.

Let me get this straight...fed confiscation of property is good for private industry and business, and conservation is conservative.

:eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh:

Where on earth were you educated? Did you go past the 8th grade?



I think he's suggesting that his schooling was in the 18th century....

...and when they get that old, you know......


...sad.
 
So you would log the forests bare, and let the creeks and rivers run brown with soil that would come down? What of the present use of the forests as water storage and recreation?

PC, what you are argueing is that unless the forests are used for the generation of more wealth for the already wealthy, they are not being used. For your information, this nation consists of a lot more than just the wealthy.
 
"Conservation" did more to obliterate our salmon population than anything else because they insisted that all the creek beds be completely sterilized and all organic matter (dead trees/slash) removed from them...which led to the water temp rising and removed all cover for baby salmon.
 
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.

This is possibly the stupidest post I have ever seen on this site.

Let me get this straight...fed confiscation of property is good for private industry and business, and conservation is conservative.

:eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh:

Where on earth were you educated? Did you go past the 8th grade?

?
 
"
The Woods Hole Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts was established as the first government-run center for fisheries research in the United States.1880’s—Corps of Engineers carried out snag removal in lower Chehalis River, throughout decade "

"
1883 Livingston Stone surveys the Columbia River to locate a suitable hatchery site.
In the United States, the influential Livingston Stone maintained that salmon ran up rivers randomly, fostering the misconception that salmon were readily transplantable from river to river. Stone’s rejection of the home-stream concept encouraged reliance on hatcheries, and transplanting of stocks became a cornerstone of salmon management in the United States. If salmon had no real dependence on their home streams, then why not move them around so as not to conflict with other desired uses of the land.
1883 David Starr Jordan, the first president of Stanford University and the leading academic salmon biologist of his day, shared Stone’s view, stating, ‘It is the prevailing impression that salmon have such special instinct which leads them to return to spawn on the same spawning grounds where they were originally hatched. We fail to find any evidence of this in the case of Pacific Coast salmon, and we do not believe it to be true.
1884 George Brown Goode tells the World Fisheries Congress that salmon on the Columbia are under complete control of the fish culturists, even though there was no solid evidence of success. The U.S. Fish Commission viewed hatcheries as the primary management activity, saying that it was easy to make fish so abundant through artificial propagation that regulation of the harvest would be unnecessary. "

The fucking salmon situation is the way it is because of government interference and retarded academics thinking they were better suited to *manage* than the people who live there.

http://www.nativefishsociety.org/conservation/documents/CHRONCR-NWSALMONDECLINE3-12-09.pdf
 
Last edited:
So, you are against confiscating public funds for the benefit of private industry and business?

Just to address other points of your characteristically long and complex post (much of which is hearsay, allegation and presumption), I agree that education is horribly carried out, or rather not done at all, in various levels of schooling, parenting and socializing (not the 'zing', not a 'zim') everywhere in the world.
When I was at my university, the dominant dogma was ultra-conservative, with a few vocal exceptions. Guess the pendulum swings both ways. Being neither right nor left, I don't like to see excesses either way.

This is possibly the stupidest post I have ever seen on this site.

Let me get this straight...fed confiscation of property is good for private industry and business, and conservation is conservative.

:eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh::eusa_eh:

Where on earth were you educated? Did you go past the 8th grade?

?

?
 

Forum List

Back
Top