AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,644
- 9,284
- 1,340
Click the pic.
I did, it showed exactly nothing fraudulent going on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Click the pic.
The objective evidence was cited in the article or did you miss that?
Wtf are talking about?? The article specifically states that no such evidence was found:
"we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections"
Evidence of some sort of system vulnerability is not evidence that it was actually used to change results.
since you believe that election officials are corrupt then it would not matter if they did a forensic audit on the machines as you would not believe themof various aspects
None of the aspects involved a forensic audit of the machines. None involved seeing the envelopes with signatures for mail in votes. The election officials never showed their work was done properly. All we have is the word of corrupt officials. We are supposed to be the boss and cannot see the work that was supposed to be done? That is bullshit and it is fraud hidden by a legal technicality and compromised judges.
Loading…
voterga.org
On December 17, 2020 the Georgia Senate Judiciary Election Law sub-committee provided their election
integrity findings to Secretary Raffensperger and the executive branch. The sub-committee chair was
former Judge William Ligon with 16 years’ experience dealing with evidence. Finding number 9 of his
report states, “The oral testimonies of witnesses on December 3, 2020, and subsequently, the written
testimonies submitted by many others, provide ample evidence that the 2020 Georgia General Election
was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it should not be certified”. When
Senator Ligon was asked what did Secretary Raffensperger do with the evidence in your report, he stated,
“the Secretary did nothing”. The Secretary did not even reference any of the General Assembly’s evidence
in his letter to Congress
Finally, because the same equipment was used in 48 other counties in Michigan, this casts significant doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan. I’m sure that with more Dominion equipment being audited, it would cast a dark shadow across 30 state elections. Only time will tell but ultimately the truth does come out, one way or another.since you believe that election officials are corrupt then it would not matter if they did a forensic audit on the machines as you would not believe them
Still there is a difference between believing that no one would cheat vs whether the cheating was enough to affect the outcome.
Michigan did a forensic audit of the voting machines
Forensic Audit of the Dominion Voting Equipment in Michigan Shows 'Intentional Errors'
just like I have said since day one, the judges threw the cases out without a hearing to introduce their evidence.It's 2024 now, what lawsuit did Trump campaign's hordes of lawyers file citing this bullshit?
Here, I'll even give you the full list of what they filed in GA:
Dammit you people are fucking STUPID.Wtf are talking about?? The article specifically states that no such evidence was found:
"we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections"
Evidence of some sort of system vulnerability is not evidence that it was actually used to change results.
They term they used was it as 'paused'.
Fact check that.
Dammit you people are fucking STUPID.
The asswipe media has you believing it's about Trump and 2020, and it's not.
It's about cyber security. Go Google on those words and maybe you'll learn something
(Or maybe not, if you're a dumbass brainwashed leftard)
Why the fuck do you think they call them EXPLOITS?
Today - TODAY - there were 16 billion sensitive records exposed online.
You people better get a fucking clue.
See how totally ignorant these assholes are? ^^^...Trump????
What part of NO EVIDENCE THAT VULNERABILITIES WERE EXPLOITED do you not understand?
What the hell does that have to do with Trump?
You said they didn't do that.....so which is it.If they were counting around the clock there was no pause.
Google usually works for me.....try it out.provide your data. list the states and what time they paused.
Just blew your claim about the pic out of the water.I did, it showed exactly nothing fraudulent going on.
You said they didn't do that.....so which is it.
Google usually works for me.....try it out.
The objective evidence was in the data provided by Halderman.Wtf are talking about?? The article specifically states that no such evidence was found:
"we are not aware of any evidence that the vulnerabilities have been exploited to change votes in past elections"
Evidence of some sort of system vulnerability is not evidence that it was actually used to change results.
Ha ha ha.....still afraid of google.so you made it up.
cool.
Thanks for verifying
Ha ha ha.....still afraid of google.
....so Trump campaign used it to sue specific states to challenge the result of the election.The objective evidence was in the data provided by Halderman.
There ya go....the fact