Election Expert Hacks into Dominion Voting Machine Tabulator in Court on Friday in GA in front of Judge USING ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS

[Lesh]

You haven't been following Jeffry Clark's disbarment hearing I bet.

What about it?

 

[Foxfyre]

Trump was right, again! Time to got back to paper ballots, that for some reason were able to be counted within hours not days to determine the winner.

BREAKING: Professor and Election Expert J. Halderman Hacks into Dominion Voting Machine in Court on Friday in Georgia in front of Judge Totenberg USING ONLY A PEN TO CHANGE VOTE TOTALS | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Update: After speaking with election integrity expert Garland Favorito we discovered the courtroom display was much more serious than we originally reported.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

A weaponized DOJ that is likely manipulating a lot of our court system, corrupt state officials, and a highly partisan and dishonest MSM are never going to be honest about much of anything that could cost them votes or expose their dishonesty and/or bad acts.

Even paper ballots is not the whole answer. In addition to paper ballots, they MUST be counted where they are cast to ensure an honest chain of custody and they MUST be counted by hand with poll watchers of all interested parties able to observe up close and personal and a certified tally given to the poll watchers before the ballots are electronically submitted.

Here in New Mexico we have paper ballots. But when you fill out your ballot you feed it into an electronic machine and have absolutely no way to know if it was actually counted or was counted the way you cast the ballot. The law here specifies that a recount can be done only if the margin is less than 1%

And time and again we have seen a case where the Republican was ahead and miraculously a forgotten ballot box was found with just enough Democrat ballots to get the win. It doesn't take a lot of manipulation to get over that 1% to prevent a recount. And the law specifies that the one requesting the recount must pay for it.

New Mexico has never had a Republican legislature in the hundred and twelve years it has been a state. And we remain at or near the bottom of most of the good lists and at or near the top of most of the bad lists.

 

[Lesh]

A weaponized DOJ that is likely manipulating a lot of our court system, corrupt state officials, and a highly partisan and dishonest MSM are never going to be honest about much of anything that could cost them votes or expose their dishonesty and/or bad acts.

Even paper ballots is not the whole answer. In addition to paper ballots, they MUST be counted where they are cast to ensure an honest chain of custody and they MUST be counted by hand with poll watchers of all interested parties able to observe up close and personal and a certified tally given to the poll watchers before the ballots are electronically submitted.

Here in New Mexico we have paper ballots. But when you fill out your ballot you feed it into an electronic machine and have absolutely no way to know if it was actually counted or was counted the way you cast the ballot. The law here specifies that a recount can be done only if the margin is less than 1%

And time and again we have seen a case where the Republican was ahead and miraculously a forgotten ballot box was found with just enough Democrat ballots to get the win. It doesn't take a lot of manipulation to get over that 1% to prevent a recount. And the law specifies that the one requesting the recount must pay for it.

New Mexico has never had a Republican legislature in the hundred and twelve years it has been a state. And we remain at or near the bottom of most of the good lists and at or near the top of most of the bad lists.

Does the paper ballot get destroyed by the counting machine?
No

So as long as that paper ballot is available to be counted the election integrity does not depend on the counting machine

 

[Foxfyre]

Does the paper ballot get destroyed by the counting machine?
No

So as long as that paper ballot is available to be counted the election integrity does not depend on the counting machine

We are required to believe what the counting machine counts. There is no hand count. And unless the margin of win is less than 1% there is no recount. The person demanding a recount is required to pay the entire cost of it. Few bother knowing the recount would include a lot of dishonest ballots with no way to prove they are bogus ballots.

New Mexico has not produced a win for a Republican President since 1988 except for a very slight well under 1% margin for GW Bush in 2004. Bush got less than 50% of that vote but Kerry got just a few votes less. That election wasn't contested because Bush was already ahead more than the entire population of New Mexico and had secured the EC vote and there is no way a recount would have made any difference with just under 750,000 votes cast. And New Mexico only has five electoral college votes.

 

[Delldude]

What about it?

You too?

 

[Lesh]

We are required to believe what the counting machine counts. There is no hand count. And unless the margin of win is less than 1% there is no recount. The person demanding a recount is required to pay the entire cost of it. Few bother knowing the recount would include a lot of dishonest ballots with no way to prove they are bogus ballots.

New Mexico has not produced a win for a Republican President since 1988 except for a very slight well under 1% margin for GW Bush in 2004. Bush got less than 50% of that vote but Kerry got just a few votes less. That election wasn't contested because Bush was already ahead more than the entire population of New Mexico and had secured the EC vote and there is no way a recount would have made any difference with just under 750,000 votes cast. And New Mexico only has five electoral college votes.

In every instance where they were recounts, and there were many, the recounts match the machines

 

[Delldude]

In every instance where they were recounts, and there were many, the recounts match the machines

And what of signature verification, vote totals to registered voters and other forensic venues?

 

[Lesh]

And what of signature verification, vote totals to registered voters and other forensic venues?

We were talking about Dominion counting machines.

Glad you understand that there was no fraud there nor could there be

 

[Foxfyre]

In every instance where they were recounts, and there were many, the recounts match the machines

In your dream world maybe. In actuality pretty much never unless it was the same people doing the counting.

 

[Delldude]

We were talking about Dominion counting machines.

Glad you understand that there was no fraud there nor could there be

Ok, then prove your claim.

 

[Lesh]

Ok, then prove your claim.

Prove what?

 

[Delldude]

Prove what?

Big reach, clown man............

Glad you understand that there was no fraud there nor could there be

 

[Lesh]

Big reach, clown man............

Again… every recount has confirmed the numbers that the Dominion machines counted

 

[Lesh]

And oh yea… Fox had to pay a bunch of money for falsely defaming Dominion

 

[Delldude]

Again… every recount has confirmed the numbers that the Dominion machines counted

Great, did they also confirm every vote was legit with verified signatures, vote total to voters registered, voter addresses?

And oh yea… Fox had to pay a bunch of money for falsely defaming Dominion

No they didn't. They chose to settle out of court instead of pursuing the case in court.

 

[otto105]

Great, did they also confirm every vote was legit with verified signatures, vote total to voters registered, voter addresses?

No they didn't. They chose to settle out of court instead of pursuing the case in court.

Yes, why do you question it without any evidence?

 

[munkle]

How the Chinese Government Really Does Control US Elections Through Dominion Systems Vote-Counting Machines​

 

[Lesh]

Great, did they also confirm every vote was legit with verified signatures, vote total to voters registered, voter addresses?

No they didn't. They chose to settle out of court instead of pursuing the case in court.

Try to focus dickface. This is about Dominion not general election whining

 

[Lesh]

Great, did they also confirm every vote was legit with verified signatures, vote total to voters registered, voter addresses?

No they didn't. They chose to settle out of court instead of pursuing the case in court.

They settled for 3/4 billion

 

[Delldude]

Try to focus dickface. This is about Dominion not general election whining

Keep dodging the reality...........cockbreath.

Has to do directly with the reported results.

Call me dickface all day long, I'd rather not be known for cockbreath..................

They settled for 3/4 billion

With no court ruling.