Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Hutch Starskey]

Not up to me, there, you hapless twit.

Then you probably shouldn’t speak so absolutely about something that hasn’t happened yet.

 

[Synthaholic]

Still an opinion. A higher opinion will soon rub this one out. Then you can whine and whine and whine...

How is SCOTUS going to interfere in a state running their election after they have ruled that states run their own elections?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Then you probably shouldn’t speak so absolutely about something that hasn’t happened yet.

Section 3 says otherwise

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How is SCOTUS going to interfere in a state running their election after they have ruled that states run their own elections?

Because it's not in the jurisdiction of the states to make that call. Only Congress can

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Ever read section 3 of the 14th amendment?

You mean the one you're spamming the board with? Yep.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Read section 3 of the 14th amendment

What am I looking for and what does that have to do with my post?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You mean the one you're spamming the board with? Yep.

Got to do it to get it through you leftists thick skulls that you don't know better

 

[Synthaholic]

There was no Insurrection.

Stomp your feet!

Hold your breath!

Throw a hissy-fit!

All those are guaranteed to work for you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

What am I looking for and what does that have to do with my post?

Look it up simp

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Got to do it to get it through you leftists thick skulls that you don't know better

Conservatives believe in states rights. You must be the other guy.

 

[Missourian]

View attachment 876265

They are right.

This decision is one of the best things that could happen for the Trump Campaign and they know it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Look it up simp

Funny, I bet he would understand if it was Biden being kicked off the ballot.

 

[BackAgain]

States rights. Remember those?

SCOTUS has affirmed states running federal elections, not Feds running federal elections, Shitty Lawyer.

Yes, failed human, in many regards states do run elections within their own respective borders. You fuckstick.

But that doesn’t mean that the Federal Government (or its courts) are obliged to accept the denial to that state’s citizens of their right of electoral choice in federal elections.

Does your severely limited mind retain the ability to recall ANY instances of federal courts involving themselves in State election challenges?

Give up. Synthia; your tragic and severe mental retardation means that you’ll never be up to this discussion.

 

[Synthaholic]

And that’s all that’s needed? Some Democrats’ OPINION that there was an insurrection and that Trump engaged on it?

That‘s some slope there. Republicans can just determine that Biden is a traitor and knock him off ballots too.

First of all Democrats have nothing to do with this.

And yes, Supreme Court Justices' opinions carry weight. Every SCOTUS verdict handed down starts with "In the opinion of the court...".

What about that don't you understand?

And that opinion was based on evidence that you refused to know about because rightwing media refused to tell you about it, and you're too much of a lemming to search for it on legitimate news sources because rightwing media told you to only believe them.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Posted here Many times. When you dispute a statement, you do your own work to develop your rebuttal. Thinkers don’t bite at the bogus assignment to provide more material for you. We are not trying to convince you about anything. We know firmly the facts and realities.

Could’ve fooled me.
BTW… who establishes if someone has engaged in insurrection?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Conservatives believe in states rights. You must be the other guy.

It's not a states right. However you are disenfranchising thousands of Coloradoan voters how democratic of you.

 

[Synthaholic]

Yes, failed human, in many regards states do run elections within their own respective borders. You fuckstick.

But that doesn’t mean that the Federal Government (or its courts) are obliged to accept the denial to that state’s citizens of their right of electoral choice in federal elections.

Does your severely limited mind retain the ability to recall ANY instances of federal courts involving themselves in State election challenges?

Give up. Synthia; your tragic and severe mental retardation means that you’ll never be up to this discussion.

OK, show us case law that backs you up.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Both house must declare it an insurrection not judges

Says who?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He wasn't removed numbnuts Congress never said it was an insurrection

Section 3.​

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the
Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability

Please explain your point with this post.

 

[Synthaholic]

It also says Congress is to make the determination.

Where? Post the 14th and highlight it.