Defiant1
Gold Member
- Mar 23, 2010
- 7,579
- 1,183
- 290
Its what they do to women who are on the left.
Note the women they love in the republican party, they all have to look good.
They don't have to look good they just have to behave like women.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Its what they do to women who are on the left.
Note the women they love in the republican party, they all have to look good.
Behave according to how you say a woman should behave? I have a feeling you're quite old.Its what they do to women who are on the left.
Note the women they love in the republican party, they all have to look good.
They don't have to look good they just have to behave like women.
Its what they do to women who are on the left.
Note the women they love in the republican party, they all have to look good.
Along with the usual RW echo chamber - as predicted - another loonie posts this:
ihopehefails posts:
"How can Obama pick this person for the Supreme Court?
"Why Obama is picking this new person to be on the supreme court is beyond me. Doesn't anyone see the conflict of interest of having a member of the prosecuting team be on the supreme court. Every case that is going to be argued will have a supreme court justice that has sympathies for the prosecuting team. This would not be a fair and balanced jury in any case"
Can someone on the right please explain (he is one of yours)?
Its what they do to women who are on the left.
Note the women they love in the republican party, they all have to look good.
They don't have to look good they just have to behave like women.
Is she the UGLIEST nominee ever?
I hear Obama is going to nominate Rachel Maddow for something next....
Another first: I get a positive rep with 'funny" from one member and a negative rep with 'dickwad" from Dante for the exact same post.
Guess which one has a sense of humor.
I hear Obama is going to nominate Rachel Maddow for something next....
Another first: I get a positive rep with 'funny" from one member and a negative rep with 'dickwad" from Dante for the exact same post.
Guess which one has a sense of humor.
hitler?
What do you have against Maddow? She's a Rhodes Scholar with a doctorate from Oxford.He's right. She puts the UGH in Ugly.
Is she the UGLIEST nominee ever?
I hear Obama is going to nominate Rachel Maddow for something next....
What do you have against Maddow? She's a Rhodes Scholar with a doctorate from Oxford.Is she the UGLIEST nominee ever?
I hear Obama is going to nominate Rachel Maddow for something next....
I think Rachel enjoys her job exposing Cons for their dishonesty. She backs it all up with facts. Video is something Cons apparently are still unaware of.
What do you have against Maddow? She's a Rhodes Scholar with a doctorate from Oxford.I hear Obama is going to nominate Rachel Maddow for something next....
I think Rachel enjoys her job exposing Cons for their dishonesty. She backs it all up with facts. Video is something Cons apparently are still unaware of.
Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar too. And he also liked the bearded clam. But that doesn't mean he had any sense or was worth listening to.
Not to mention supporting her for Solicitor General is a long ways from supporting her for the Supreme Court. She has NEVER been a Judge. She is NOT qualified.
Not to mention supporting her for Solicitor General is a long ways from supporting her for the Supreme Court. She has NEVER been a Judge. She is NOT qualified.
would you have been as critical of Eisenhower for nominating Earl Warren who had NEVER been a judge, only a state attorney general and governor?
How about when Nixon nominated Rehnquist who had NEVER been a judge, only been an assistant US attorney general?
were both of them NOT qualified?
How is it not OK for her to be left of you in her politics?
If she was right leaning you would say she was fine.
Do you think left leaning people should be banned from the SCOTUS?
Not necessarily, but since she has committed actions against our military while we are at war she belongs in Gitmo not on the bench.
That statement qualifies Defiant for a one-time trip to gitmo.
You are insane
None of the 3 of you should be allowed to vote.
Not necessarily, but since she has committed actions against our military while we are at war she belongs in Gitmo not on the bench.
You are insane
None of the 3 of you should be allowed to vote.
If I told you what I do for a living, you would shit your pants.
Not to mention supporting her for Solicitor General is a long ways from supporting her for the Supreme Court. She has NEVER been a Judge. She is NOT qualified.
would you have been as critical of Eisenhower for nominating Earl Warren who had NEVER been a judge, only a state attorney general and governor?
How about when Nixon nominated Rehnquist who had NEVER been a judge, only been an assistant US attorney general?
were both of them NOT qualified?