Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If everyone agreed with what was said, then you wouldn't have to have free speech laws. But because each of us can find something we disagree with or different individuals might find something hateful or offensive, we need free speech laws so we all can express our thoughts and opinions.Nobody should be censored for having wrong opinions and Alex does have some I think wrong.
And nobody should be censored for having right opinions just because they oppose or expose 'woke' or 'progressive' or 'leftist' nonsense.
I think Jones was wrong in the video accusing a reporter. Not in what he said which was spot on but in making it personal and personally insulting. But a banning offense? No way. Certainly those who thought it wrong could say so in no uncertain terms.
Free speech assumes a right to express yourself even when you are wrong or when others think you are wrong. And when you do so in public, it assumes the right of others to tell you why they think you are wrong.
And every single one of us should have the right to fully express ourselves in private in any way we want and not be condemned when somebody repeats that out of context and in a way to make it disinformation.
What was the verdict?You mean Sandy Hook crisis actors?
in america we dont have free speech laws,,,If everyone agreed with what was said, then you wouldn't have to have free speech laws. But because each of us can find something we disagree with or different individuals might find something hateful or offensive, we need free speech laws so we all can express our thoughts and opinions.
The U.S. Constitution is based, among other things, on the concept that liberty not only allows us freedom to go where we want to go and do what we want to do unhindered by government so long as we do not violate the rights of others, but they strongly emphasized that no law, government official, religious entity, or anything else could deny us a God given right to our thoughts, opinions, ideas, beliefs, convictions no matter how wrong, offensive, un-PC those might be. Nor can any government or religious authority require us to embrace anybody else's ideas of what is doctrine, right, acceptable.If everyone agreed with what was said, then you wouldn't have to have free speech laws. But because each of us can find something we disagree with or different individuals might find something hateful or offensive, we need free speech laws so we all can express our thoughts and opinions.
Progs spew on the premise they are all pure and never do anything wrong. The reality is they are on a soapbox 24 hours a day and have gotten a lot of mileage out of it. If Jones was a politician, he would do what they do only on the other side. He has many questions not answered.
I wish I got a quid every time an American said, "Rights", I would then have enough money to pay your national debt off.The U.S. Constitution is based, among other things, on the concept that liberty not only allows us freedom to go where we want to go and do what we want to do unhindered by government so long as we do not violate the rights of others, but they strongly emphasized that no law, government official, religious entity, or anything else could deny us a God given right to our thoughts, opinions, ideas, beliefs, convictions no matter how wrong, offensive, un-PC those might be. Nor can any government or religious authority require us to embrace anybody else's ideas of what is doctrine, right, acceptable.
Again such liberty is contingent that we do not violate the legal or unalienable rights of others.
Those who do not understand the concept of the U.S. Declaration of Independence that formed the foundation of the U.S. Constitution really can't understand the concept of rights as normal Americans understand them.I wish I got a quid every time an American said, "Rights", I would then have enough money to pay your national debt off.
This is good news for Alex. He deserves to be back on the platform in order to spread the truth and expose corruption. Let's pray Elon puts him on X.
DEVELOPING: Elon Musk Considers Reinstating Alex Jones on X | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Elon Musk is considering reinstating Infowars founder Alex Jones on X.www.thegatewaypundit.com
The U.S. Constitution is based, among other things, on the concept that liberty not only allows us freedom to go where we want to go and do what we want to do unhindered by government so long as we do not violate the rights of others, but they strongly emphasized that no law, government official, religious entity, or anything else could deny us a God given right to our thoughts, opinions, ideas, beliefs, convictions no matter how wrong, offensive, un-PC those might be. Nor can any government or religious authority require us to embrace anybody else's ideas of what is doctrine, right, acceptable.
Again such liberty is contingent that we do not violate the legal or unalienable rights of others.
Do you believe this will bring back advertisers?This is good news for Alex. He deserves to be back on the platform in order to spread the truth and expose corruption. Let's pray Elon puts him on X.
DEVELOPING: Elon Musk Considers Reinstating Alex Jones on X | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Elon Musk is considering reinstating Infowars founder Alex Jones on X.
Apart from his chip experiments in monkey brains, and as a fascist and private information pimp, Musk has scrubbed (his own posts [italics]) linked to the origins of SARS2. It's always already a mistake to get amnesia about the origins of SARS2.Twitter is not the Govt, thus they have every right as a private entity to deny anyone anything they wish.
www.usmessageboard.com
Apart from his chip experiments in monkey brains
Did you feel the same way about the baker not wanting to participate in a gay wedding?Twitter is not the Govt, thus they have every right as a private entity to deny anyone anything they wish.
Did you feel the same way about the baker not wanting to participate in a gay wedding?
There were problems with viruses linked to UC Davis, so what RFK Jr. has to say about UC Davis should be reviewed.I have been reading about this, it is not good. I wonder if anyone on the right will care
I don't disagree that Twitter can run their business as they choose and the baker should be able to do the same. But I also admire Elon Musk who appreciates the importance of social media to influence, inform, and also its power to disinform and suppress information. And his choice was to make Twitter, now X, an open forum for a free exchange of ideas, concepts, information without censorship except in those areas that are unacceptable to ALL civil society.100%. They have every right to say no, go somewhere else.
