Generally ... liberals are on the receiving end of charity -- but rarely grateful for all of that free stuff.This is the flipside of what one would expect. More anal retention in the liberal mentality. Fascinating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Generally ... liberals are on the receiving end of charity -- but rarely grateful for all of that free stuff.This is the flipside of what one would expect. More anal retention in the liberal mentality. Fascinating.
They profit first by panhandling for government funding so that they themselves don't have to continue on in charity lines, so that they don't (justifiably) appear as dereliction in all its original splendor. Religion's pathology is masked from the start, each fiscal year. duhhahah Churches provide meals for the homeless, shelters, etc....they are literally non-profit organizations.
But read the study in the links provided...it's not just churches....Conservatives donate even more of their own blood.
Dembots are just selfish people
The lefties are obsessed with their blue check marks. They are the ones screaming about them.I think the conservative obsession over the blue check mark is just another reminder of how conservatives always wanted to be able to sit at the cool kids table back in high school and were rejected.....they have failed to get over that rejection ever since......hence is why they are so giddy that they feel they can determine who gets to sit at the "cool table" now -- even if it is something as trivial as a blue check mark
Not the churches I've given to. The churches I've supported had very effective and far-reaching outreaches. They would drive seniors around town (grocery store, doctor, basic errands). They would deliver meals to the needy. They would deliver toys and clothing around Christmastime. Don't let your bias get in the way of the facts.Because they are unlike other charities. The vast majority of money given to a local church stays within the walls of the church.
It makes sense. The longer the organism stands in charity lines, the more sensitive it gets (Albuquerque: stabbings in charity food lines).Generally ... liberals are on the receiving end of charity -- but rarely grateful for all of that free stuff.
Why would we take churches out of it? They help the poor more than anyone else.Take churches out of that and the difference disappears
The largest charity in the world is Catholic Charities I would disagree that "very few" do those things....it might be true that in a lot of churches it's smaller part of their budget, especially as your link says (which doesn't support your claim that very few churches do those things) don't spend as much, espcially smaller churches with less then 200 members.Very few do those things.
Less than 5% of what they bring in goes back out for those things...
How Churches Spend their Money
By Brant Henshaw | Treasurer and Director of Administrative Services Local church volunteers often call and ask how their spending “fits” in with the average church budget. This is a great question…www.pnwumc.org
Not the churches I've given to. The churches I've supported had very effective and far-reaching outreaches. They would drive seniors around town (grocery store, doctor, basic errands). They would deliver meals to the needy. They would deliver toys and clothing around Christmastime. Don't let your bias get in the way of the facts.
You just repeated the fallacy, where you define paying dues to your own social club as charitable giving.Conservatives give more to the poor,
Understand that Brooks just makes nonsense up, including his blood statistics, by fudging the question of what defines liberals and conservatives. This paper talks about how.heck...they even donate more BLOOD
You got a major hate-tingle out of that, didn't you?Dembots are faithless people, that don't give to charity...because they are selfish people
However, confiscating a person's right to psychologically rewarding activities rather than charity must be interdicted at some point to put a leash on religion's charity. Supporting charity for the more disabled is a different thing than supporting a more independent program for personally-prepared meals and the piece-by-piece building of their shelters.Not the churches I've given to. The churches I've supported had very effective and far-reaching outreaches. They would drive seniors around town (grocery store, doctor, basic errands). They would deliver meals to the needy. They would deliver toys and clothing around Christmastime. Don't let your bias get in the way of the facts.
Im sure people who give a lot of money to churches really want to believe that.My church does all that, too, as well as extensive disaster relief around the world. In my experiences, most churches prioritize outreach and giving to the community and beyond.
by cool kids you mean the ones strung out on dope and suffering from an std...rightI think the conservative obsession over the blue check mark is just another reminder of how conservatives always wanted to be able to sit at the cool kids table back in high school and were rejected.....they have failed to get over that rejection ever since......hence is why they are so giddy that they feel they can determine who gets to sit at the "cool table" now -- even if it is something as trivial as a blue check mark
Not the churches I've given to. The churches I've supported had very effective and far-reaching outreaches. They would drive seniors around town (grocery store, doctor, basic errands). They would deliver meals to the needy. They would deliver toys and clothing around Christmastime. Don't let your bias get in the way of the facts.
when you're a billionaire you can choose to payfor... whatever also
The largest charity in the world is Catholic Charities I would disagree that "very few" do those things....it might be true that in a lot of churches it's smaller part of their budget, especially as your link says (which doesn't support your claim that very few churches do those things) don't spend as much, espcially smaller churches with less then 200 members.
Of course churches have to also pay their employees, pay taxes like Medicare and Medicaid, pay their bills etc.
Geez, your link doesn't support your claim at all
Generally ... liberals are on the receiving end of charity -- but rarely grateful for all of that free stuff.
There's a lot more to giving than just the monetary cost but if you don't have a charitable spirit you probably wouldn't understand. It's also why Conservatives (generally Christian) are far more giving than liberals are. Liberals are worried about how much it will cost to give. Conservatives consider the cost if they DON'T give.Did you ever sit on the budget committees for any of these churches?
All of those things are cheap and cost basically nothing.
Till about a decade ago I was as involved in church as one can be. If the door was open I was there. I served on committees from budget to outreach and more. My wife and I started Children's churches in two separate churches and ran an AWANA club with more than 1000 kids in it.
The facts are 95% of what is given to a church stays in the walls of said church.
Im sure people who give a lot of money to churches really want to believe that.