FA_Q2
Gold Member
The fact remains that there are times when "nothing" is exactly what should be done. There is nothing at all moral about the "do anything" argument. It should be obvious but if you don't know what you're doing you damn well shouldn't do it. You are many times more likely to cause harm than help and there is simply no excuse for that. Some of you guys would have cut the woman's throat to no purpose other than wanting to act like a TV hero.
As stated before, you are completely incorrect. The fact is, there is ONE thing that she should have done weather or not it actually changed anything WALKED BACK THERE AND EVALUATED THE SITUATION. You keep harping on the fact that she could do nothing BUT the reality here is that she had no fucking clue that there was nothing that she could have done. In order for her to know that there was nothing to do, she would have had to take the time and bother to even LOOK at the woman, something that she refused to do. That is wrong and unlike syrenn, I actually believe it should be actionable as she was in uniform.
If she does not want the responsibility to bother and address the need of others then she should have never placed that uniform on her body. She is unfit for it.