England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE

[emilynghiem]

Remove the politics from the picture. Just focus on conservation and restoration of natual environment and capping/cleaning up POLLUTION and toxins, and there is plenty to focus on without raising a single argument or debate on temperature.

Isn't it curious how all this is a distraction?
Detracting resources and attention from working on cleaning up the debris in oceans,
and the dangers threatening natural wilderness and endangered wildlife?

Doesn't that reak of the media or other agenda reaping profits from this "crisis" and related hype/debates,
whereas focusing on addressing pollution and environmental hazards would have
been more UNIFYING and productive and achieved the same effect of cutting down on waste.

So why wasn't the focus there? Except it would not divide sides and yield as high ratings/profits?
Doesn't that seem odd to you why the focus would shift to disagreement, as if to deliberately stir up opposition?

I believe that the only thing that has been clearly proven is that there are people who are so invested into their political leanings that they will allow it to trump everything - overwhelming scientific evidence included.

There is no certainty - science doesn't deal in certainties - but the overwhelming (like 97%) of scientists in appropriate fields say the evidence is pointing so strongly in that direction (AGW) that they are extremely confident of the findings.

It's like this: If you are standing on a beach with 100 oceanographers and 97 of them start heading for higher ground screaming "a tsunami is coming" and three just stand there saying, "I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say with 100% certainty that a tsunami is coming," what are you gonna do?

I'm heading for the hills.

 

[mamooth]

A six-year-old story about Monckton's flailing BS?

Denialists are getting truly desperate. They can't even find any new fabrications to support their cult.

 

[Pogo]

Remove the politics from the picture. Just focus on conservation and restoration of natual environment and capping/cleaning up POLLUTION and toxins, and there is plenty to focus on without raising a single argument or debate on temperature.

Isn't it curious how all this is a distraction?
Detracting resources and attention from working on cleaning up the debris in oceans,
and the dangers threatening natural wilderness and endangered wildlife?

Doesn't that reak of the media or other agenda reaping profits from this "crisis" and related hype/debates,
whereas focusing on addressing pollution and environmental hazards would have
been more UNIFYING and productive and achieved the same effect of cutting down on waste.

So why wasn't the focus there? Except it would not divide sides and yield as high ratings/profits?
Doesn't that seem odd to you why the focus would shift to disagreement, as if to deliberately stir up opposition?

Exactly -- this is a giant rhetorical deflection driven by those entities who would bear the responsibility of cleaning up after themselves, and using the rhetorical methods (and personnel) of the same denialism launched against the link between tobacco and cancer.

And fools like the OP buy this snake oil hook, line and sinker.

As noted before, you don't just leave your garbage on your lawn and refuse to clean it up unless you hear personally from a rat that that's why he came there. You clean up your mess before it becomes a problem. Common sense.

 

[oreo]

While the left's leaders continue to LIE about "Climate Change" for power & control (and the left's subservient sheep continue to be willfully ignorant puppets refusing to question anything) - a court in England has now proven that the entire "climate change" issue is a farce.

Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

I'm going to repeat that: 77 pages worth of corrections to their movie.

Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms. Kalee Kreider, begins by saying that the film presented “thousands and thousands of facts.” It did not: just 2,000 “facts” in 93 minutes would have been one fact every three seconds. The film contained only a few dozen points, most of which will be seen to have been substantially inaccurate. The judge concentrated only on nine points which even the UK Government, to which Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit did not represent mainstream scientific opinion.

Ms. Kreider then states, incorrectly, that the judge himself had never used the term “errors.” In fact, the judge used the term “errors,” in inverted commas, throughout his judgment.

Couple Al Gore's people being forced to admit all of their lies with under penalty of perjury with the not one, but TWO different rounds of "Climate Gate" and the fact that the left predicted the polar ice caps would be melted by 2013 when in fact they have now expanded by 60% and, well, only an idiot libtard could ignore all of this indisputable concrete evidence in favor of their masters propaganda.

35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore?s movie | Monckton

Global cooling: Arctic ice caps grows by 60% against global warming predictions | Mail Online

Climate Gate News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com

Look climate change as been around since the beginning of earth. We know we came through an ice age--thousands of years ago our continent the USA was mostly covered in thick ice. The earth warmed and the ice receded--and there were very few men around to cause all of that--

Now we see the ice receding--and it's "the sky is falling." And as always-- one has to "follow the money". Al Gore has made millions on his global warming theory. Scientists get large grants for reporting on global warming--and a scientist who disagrees gets nothing. In turn green energy firms line the pockets of politicians and politicians give tax payer subsidies to green energy firms.

It's really very simple.

 

[Pogo]

"Al Gore has made millions"? Link?

How many billions do you suppose the Kochs have made on pollution then?

 

[ClosedCaption]

While the left's leaders continue to LIE about "Climate Change" for power & control (and the left's subservient sheep continue to be willfully ignorant puppets refusing to question anything) - a court in England has now proven that the entire "climate change" issue is a farce.

Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

I'm going to repeat that: 77 pages worth of corrections to their movie.

Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms. Kalee Kreider, begins by saying that the film presented “thousands and thousands of facts.” It did not: just 2,000 “facts” in 93 minutes would have been one fact every three seconds. The film contained only a few dozen points, most of which will be seen to have been substantially inaccurate. The judge concentrated only on nine points which even the UK Government, to which Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit did not represent mainstream scientific opinion.

Ms. Kreider then states, incorrectly, that the judge himself had never used the term “errors.” In fact, the judge used the term “errors,” in inverted commas, throughout his judgment.

Couple Al Gore's people being forced to admit all of their lies with under penalty of perjury with the not one, but TWO different rounds of "Climate Gate" and the fact that the left predicted the polar ice caps would be melted by 2013 when in fact they have now expanded by 60% and, well, only an idiot libtard could ignore all of this indisputable concrete evidence in favor of their masters propaganda.

35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore?s movie | Monckton

Global cooling: Arctic ice caps grows by 60% against global warming predictions | Mail Online

Climate Gate News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com

Look climate change as been around since the beginning of earth. We know we came through an ice age--thousands of years ago our continent the USA was mostly covered in thick ice. The earth warmed and the ice receded--and there were very few men around to cause all of that--

Now we see the ice receding--and it's "the sky is falling." And as always-- one has to "follow the money". Al Gore has made millions on his global warming theory. Scientists get large grants for reporting on global warming--and a scientist who disagrees gets nothing. In turn green energy firms line the pockets of politicians and politicians give tax payer subsidies to green energy firms.

It's really very simple.

There it is again. Follow the money and do not follow the science. People are much easier to marginalize than science...especially when you dont understand the science.

 

[bripat9643]

"Al Gore has made millions"? Link?

How many billions do you suppose the Kochs have made on pollution then?

Gore made $100 off of Algore TV alone. Note: he sold it to massive carbon polluters - the ultimate hypocrisy.

The Kochs make money producing products that people want, like gasoline and plastics. They don't pollute than any other heavy industry. Even if they did, hypocrites like you still buy their products.

 

[ClosedCaption]

AL Gore is fat too! Dont forget that important point when discussing climate change

 

[Pogo]

"Al Gore has made millions"? Link?

How many billions do you suppose the Kochs have made on pollution then?

Gore made $100 off of Algore TV alone. Note: he sold it to massive carbon polluters - the ultimate hypocrisy.

The Kochs make money producing products that people want, like gasoline and plastics. They don't pollute than any other heavy industry. Even if they did, hypocrites like you still buy their products.

"Gore made $100" Yeah I did too, in one day on eBay. No idea what the rest of that sentence even means.

Face it, none of this denialist thread is about climate or what we do to it. It's about Al Gore.

Oh and "perjury", let's not forget "perjury".

 

[Pogo]

AL Gore is fat too! Dont forget that important point when discussing climate change

Plus, it snowed. Obviously it can't snow.

 

[Old Rocks]

The problem here is that on can link these people to articles written by real scientists in peer reviewed publications, and, like Pattycake, all they do is answer with nonsensical statements and jeers. They do not want real debate or information. All they want is confirmation of their alternative universe.

AGW is real. The physics of the GHGs are well known, and have been since before the turn of 20th Century. The manufactured 'doubt' has been created by exactly the same people as created the 'doubt' about the link between smoking and cancer. There is no reason to be patient with these people. They are supporting damaging our world and the lives of our children and grandchildren.

 

[LeftofLeft]

One side, Those who believe Man (particularly those in the US) is causing Global Warming/Climate Change, were caught red handed trying to forge emails (the same way Dan Rather tried to forge documents on GWB's National Guard Service. On the other side, the Deniers, are simply questioning or outright denying it. The Difference, the deniers are not forging emails.

Climate Changers have the burden of proof and then some since their side has been shown to forge data simply to further their agenda.

 

[ClosedCaption]

One side, Those who believe Man (particularly those in the US) is causing Global Warming/Climate Change, were caught red handed trying to forge emails (the same way Dan Rather tried to forge documents on GWB's National Guard Service. On the other side, the Deniers, are simply questioning or outright denying it. The Difference, the deniers are not forging emails.

Climate Changers have the burden of proof and then some since their side has been shown to forge data simply to further their agenda.

Whatever you do make sure to never mention that the science has been peer reviewed. So lets talk about emails because...uh...EMAILS and AL GORES FAT TUMMY!

 

[Pogo]

One side, Those who believe Man (particularly those in the US) is causing Global Warming/Climate Change, were caught red handed trying to forge emails (the same way Dan Rather tried to forge documents on GWB's National Guard Service. On the other side, the Deniers, are simply questioning or outright denying it. The Difference, the deniers are not forging emails.

Climate Changers have the burden of proof and then some since their side has been shown to forge data simply to further their agenda.

"caught red handed trying to forge emails"??

Let's see your link for this one now.

Oh wait -- we're still waiting for your link on this one back here. You've got quite a backlog.

Tell me -- do you even know what a "link" is?

 

[Wry Catcher]

While the left's leaders continue to LIE about "Climate Change" for power & control (and the left's subservient sheep continue to be willfully ignorant puppets refusing to question anything) - a court in England has now proven that the entire "climate change" issue is a farce.

Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

I'm going to repeat that: 77 pages worth of corrections to their movie.

Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms. Kalee Kreider, begins by saying that the film presented “thousands and thousands of facts.” It did not: just 2,000 “facts” in 93 minutes would have been one fact every three seconds. The film contained only a few dozen points, most of which will be seen to have been substantially inaccurate. The judge concentrated only on nine points which even the UK Government, to which Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit did not represent mainstream scientific opinion.

Ms. Kreider then states, incorrectly, that the judge himself had never used the term “errors.” In fact, the judge used the term “errors,” in inverted commas, throughout his judgment.

Couple Al Gore's people being forced to admit all of their lies with under penalty of perjury with the not one, but TWO different rounds of "Climate Gate" and the fact that the left predicted the polar ice caps would be melted by 2013 when in fact they have now expanded by 60% and, well, only an idiot libtard could ignore all of this indisputable concrete evidence in favor of their masters propaganda.

35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore?s movie | Monckton

Global cooling: Arctic ice caps grows by 60% against global warming predictions | Mail Online

Climate Gate News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com

Whatever, consider this:

A mysterious giant virus buried for 30,000 years in Siberian permafrost has been resurrected.

The virus only infects single-celled organisms and doesn't closely resemble any known pathogens that harm humans.

Even so, the new discovery raises the possibility that as the climate warms and exploration expands in long-untouched regions of Siberia, humans could release ancient or eradicated viruses. These could include Neanderthal viruses or even smallpox that have lain dormant in the ice for thousands of years.


Giant Virus Resurrected from Permafrost After 30,000 Years

 

[Redfish]

Its Mardi Gras in NOLA and its 30 degrees and may sleet on March 4, 2014. We have broken records this winter for cold days.

The entire country and most of the world has broken cold and snow records this winter.

THERE IS NO FUCKIN MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING. and yes, I know the difference between weather and climate-----climate is the average of weather over a period of time.

The climate of the planet has been changing for millions of years, it will be changing millions of years from now.-------------MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.

We may be polluting the planet, but we are not changing its climate.

 

[bripat9643]

The problem here is that on can link these people to articles written by real scientists in peer reviewed publications, and, like Pattycake, all they do is answer with nonsensical statements and jeers. They do not want real debate or information. All they want is confirmation of their alternative universe.

AGW is real. The physics of the GHGs are well known, and have been since before the turn of 20th Century. The manufactured 'doubt' has been created by exactly the same people as created the 'doubt' about the link between smoking and cancer. There is no reason to be patient with these people. They are supporting damaging our world and the lives of our children and grandchildren.

You don't need to quote any so-called "climate scientists" to demonstrate that the supporters of AGW are talking out of both sides of their mouth. Several years ago they claimed snow would be a thing of the past. Now they say global warming causes blizzards. Sometimes they say global warming will cause more "extreme" weather. Then they say it will cause milder weather. No matter what the weather does, the AGW cultists claim it was caused by global warming.

Furthermore, all their predictions have turned out to be dead wrong. All their theories are post hoc rationalizations for why their previous predictions turned out to be wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

While the left's leaders continue to LIE about "Climate Change" for power & control (and the left's subservient sheep continue to be willfully ignorant puppets refusing to question anything) - a court in England has now proven that the entire "climate change" issue is a farce.

Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

I'm going to repeat that: 77 pages worth of corrections to their movie.

Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms. Kalee Kreider, begins by saying that the film presented “thousands and thousands of facts.” It did not: just 2,000 “facts” in 93 minutes would have been one fact every three seconds. The film contained only a few dozen points, most of which will be seen to have been substantially inaccurate. The judge concentrated only on nine points which even the UK Government, to which Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit did not represent mainstream scientific opinion.

Ms. Kreider then states, incorrectly, that the judge himself had never used the term “errors.” In fact, the judge used the term “errors,” in inverted commas, throughout his judgment.

Couple Al Gore's people being forced to admit all of their lies with under penalty of perjury with the not one, but TWO different rounds of "Climate Gate" and the fact that the left predicted the polar ice caps would be melted by 2013 when in fact they have now expanded by 60% and, well, only an idiot libtard could ignore all of this indisputable concrete evidence in favor of their masters propaganda.

35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore?s movie | Monckton

Global cooling: Arctic ice caps grows by 60% against global warming predictions | Mail Online

Climate Gate News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com

Look climate change as been around since the beginning of earth. We know we came through an ice age--thousands of years ago our continent the USA was mostly covered in thick ice. The earth warmed and the ice receded--and there were very few men around to cause all of that--

Now we see the ice receding--and it's "the sky is falling." And as always-- one has to "follow the money". Al Gore has made millions on his global warming theory. Scientists get large grants for reporting on global warming--and a scientist who disagrees gets nothing. In turn green energy firms line the pockets of politicians and politicians give tax payer subsidies to green energy firms.

It's really very simple.

There it is again. Follow the money and do not follow the science. People are much easier to marginalize than science...especially when you dont understand the science.

99% of the money is going to the members of the AGW cult.

Pease do follow the money. It leads to the conclusion that AGW is a giant con.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Its Mardi Gras in NOLA and its 30 degrees and may sleet on March 4, 2014. We have broken records this winter for cold days.

The entire country and most of the world has broken cold and snow records this winter.

THERE IS NO FUCKIN MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING. and yes, I know the difference between weather and climate-----climate is the average of weather over a period of time.

The climate of the planet has been changing for millions of years, it will be changing millions of years from now.-------------MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.

We may be polluting the planet, but we are not changing its climate.

You keep saying this and everytime I ask you for a link to prove your absolute you slither away.

Got that link yet to that absolute statement?

 

[Redfish]

Its Mardi Gras in NOLA and its 30 degrees and may sleet on March 4, 2014. We have broken records this winter for cold days.

The entire country and most of the world has broken cold and snow records this winter.

THERE IS NO FUCKIN MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING. and yes, I know the difference between weather and climate-----climate is the average of weather over a period of time.

The climate of the planet has been changing for millions of years, it will be changing millions of years from now.-------------MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT.

We may be polluting the planet, but we are not changing its climate.

You keep saying this and everytime I ask you for a link to prove your absolute you slither away.

Got that link yet to that absolute statement?

what the fuck more proof do you need than the weather reports for the last 50 or 100 years?