England Court PROVES "climate change" is a FARCE

The North Poles' Ice Cap grew last year because the previous year's melt was so extreme.

Yes, or course. Global warming causes global cooling-------------got it :cuckoo:

Arctic sea ice extent settles at record seasonal minimum | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

But do continue to keep your head in the sand.

:tinfoil:

climate has always been cyclical. Man has never had anything to do with it, and never will.

the arctic ice pack has grown and shrunk since we have kept records, the acts of humans have nothing to do with it.

the question is not whether the climate is changeing-------it has been changing for millions of years. The question is whether man is causing it and the answer is NO
 
Yes, or course. Global warming causes global cooling-------------got it :cuckoo:

Arctic sea ice extent settles at record seasonal minimum | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

But do continue to keep your head in the sand.

:tinfoil:

climate has always been cyclical. Man has never had anything to do with it, and never will.

the arctic ice pack has grown and shrunk since we have kept records, the acts of humans have nothing to do with it.

the question is not whether the climate is changeing-------it has been changing for millions of years. The question is whether man is causing it and the answer is NO

According to what or who? You're really heavy on absolute statements but really light in providing proof. Links?
 
England Court "PROVES" climate change is a FARCE

Buttsoiler thinks science is now decided in court :lmao:

May it please this honorable court to explain where ten million scallops went...

>> PARKSVILLE, British Columbia, Feb. 26 (UPI) -- Island Scallops, a shellfish producer on Vancouver Island, is laying off staff after it lost a majority of its scallop harvest -- 10 million, worth $10 million -- due to high acidity levels in the waters of the Georgia Strait.
"I'm not sure we are going to stay alive and I'm not sure the oyster industry is going to stay alive," Saunders told The Parksville Qualicum Beach News. "It's that dramatic."

... Saunders claims he hasn't seen PH levels in the water plunge this low in his 35 years of shellfish farming. High acidity levels means the scallops "can't make their shells and they are less robust and they are susceptible to infection," explained Saunders.

As Grist writer John Upton points out in a recent post, acidification of the ocean is a product of increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. As the oceans absorb the greenhouse gas, it reacts with the water to form bicarbonate and carbonic acid.

This isn't the first time large numbers of shellfish have died off from exposure to acidic water. For nearly a decade now, scientists and shellfish farmers have watched anxiously as shifiting ocean chemistry has decimated mollusk populations, killing oysters as well as scallops.
<< (UPI Science News)

(Thread here)

Denialists. They'll leave their own rotting food on the floor on the basis that no scientist showed up at their door to tell them it'll draw rats. And even if it does, you can't prove that's what drew the rat until the rat says so.

Oh and don't forget, smoking is good for you too so start smoking today and make sure you're getting enough tar.



And as long as we're here...
Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

Not a single one of your links says jack squat about "perjury", Buttsoiler. Not one. Nor could they; perjury would apply to testimony -- asserting bullshit under oath.
Which is what you just did minus the oath. Maybe you should stick with something you know like underwater basketweaving. Enjoy what's left of the scallops while you're down there. If you can find one after CO2 acidifies the water but no way we're doing it.
 
Last edited:
Yes, or course. Global warming causes global cooling-------------got it :cuckoo:

Arctic sea ice extent settles at record seasonal minimum | Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis

But do continue to keep your head in the sand.

:tinfoil:

climate has always been cyclical. Man has never had anything to do with it, and never will.

the arctic ice pack has grown and shrunk since we have kept records, the acts of humans have nothing to do with it.

the question is not whether the climate is changeing-------it has been changing for millions of years. The question is whether man is causing it and the answer is NO

As discussed earlier in this thread, mankind is changing the composition of the atmosphere. The question is not whether mankind is causing the change but what are the affects to the ongoing natural changes of mankind's contribution to composition of the atmosphere.
 
What part of this don't you understand? The ice caps got bigger instead of shrinking. I understand that some liberals are upset because the dire predictions failed to become reality, but don't take it out on the messengers.

How many of you Goreheads believed that NYC would be underwater now? We got a lot of warning about what was going to happen. They were all wrong and instead of being relieved, liberals are more angry than ever. What is your problem?

The North Poles' Ice Cap grew last year because the previous year's melt was so extreme.

Yes, or course. Global warming causes global cooling-------------got it :cuckoo:

Of course it does - no matter how much pride you take in putting your ignorance on display.

When you understand global heat convection, you'll realize what an idiot you're being.
 
btw - since when does a court of law produce good science ????????

That's the reason the deniers are stuck on stupid, they look to pundits, attorneys, and political hacks to provide their science.
 
I think what is clearly proven here is that
debating endlessly over temperature patterns from the beginning of earth's history
causes global headaches.

And studies will show that
reusing a single plastic bag does more good.

While the left's leaders continue to LIE about "Climate Change" for power & control (and the left's subservient sheep continue to be willfully ignorant puppets refusing to question anything) - a court in England has now proven that the entire "climate change" issue is a farce.

Al Gore's people - when under oath before a court and facing perjury - were forced to admit that their data and claims in the movie were so false, they submitted 77 pages of correction to the court.

I'm going to repeat that: 77 pages worth of corrections to their movie.

Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms. Kalee Kreider, begins by saying that the film presented “thousands and thousands of facts.” It did not: just 2,000 “facts” in 93 minutes would have been one fact every three seconds. The film contained only a few dozen points, most of which will be seen to have been substantially inaccurate. The judge concentrated only on nine points which even the UK Government, to which Gore is a climate-change advisor, had to admit did not represent mainstream scientific opinion.

Ms. Kreider then states, incorrectly, that the judge himself had never used the term “errors.” In fact, the judge used the term “errors,” in inverted commas, throughout his judgment.

Couple Al Gore's people being forced to admit all of their lies with under penalty of perjury with the not one, but TWO different rounds of "Climate Gate" and the fact that the left predicted the polar ice caps would be melted by 2013 when in fact they have now expanded by 60% and, well, only an idiot libtard could ignore all of this indisputable concrete evidence in favor of their masters propaganda.

35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore?s movie | Monckton

Global cooling: Arctic ice caps grows by 60% against global warming predictions | Mail Online

Climate Gate News and Video - FOX News Topics - FOXNews.com
 
I believe that the only thing that has been clearly proven is that there are people who are so invested into their political leanings that they will allow it to trump everything - overwhelming scientific evidence included.

There is no certainty - science doesn't deal in certainties - but the overwhelming (like 97%) of scientists in appropriate fields say the evidence is pointing so strongly in that direction (AGW) that they are extremely confident of the findings.

It's like this: If you are standing on a beach with 100 oceanographers and 97 of them start heading for higher ground screaming "a tsunami is coming" and three just stand there saying, "I'm not sure there is enough evidence to say with 100% certainty that a tsunami is coming," what are you gonna do?

I'm heading for the hills.
 
Consensus was that T-Rex was a cold blooded brute of a hunter... consensus was there could not be black holes... consensus was that the planets and sun orbited the Earth... consensus in science actually means nothing

Funny how the conclusion seems to be right in line with the agenda for the global warming alarmists, eh??
 
Since when does a group with a political agenda and a financial stake produce good science?

Glad to see you are catching on - better late than never.

Good to see you agree that the global warming alarmists have such an agenda, and their big spokespeople have a huge financial stake in the game... I bet Gore will be sad that you left his fold, but he will get over it
 
Since when does a group with a political agenda and a financial stake produce good science?

Glad to see you are catching on - better late than never.

Good to see you agree that the global warming alarmists have such an agenda, and their big spokespeople have a huge financial stake in the game... I bet Gore will be sad that you left his fold, but he will get over it

Sorry, but I have too many brain cells left to become a denier

at least until the deniers can come up with some science
 
Consensus was that T-Rex was a cold blooded brute of a hunter... consensus was there could not be black holes... consensus was that the planets and sun orbited the Earth... consensus in science actually means nothing

Funny how the conclusion seems to be right in line with the agenda for the global warming alarmists, eh??

Does anyone know what this idiot is talking about?
 
Consensus was that T-Rex was a cold blooded brute of a hunter... consensus was there could not be black holes... consensus was that the planets and sun orbited the Earth... consensus in science actually means nothing

Funny how the conclusion seems to be right in line with the agenda for the global warming alarmists, eh??

Does anyone know what this idiot is talking about?

I have no idea but I'm still reading all the links he left.... :eusa_shifty:
 
Since when does a group with a political agenda and a financial stake produce good science?

Glad to see you are catching on - better late than never.

Good to see you agree that the global warming alarmists have such an agenda, and their big spokespeople have a huge financial stake in the game... I bet Gore will be sad that you left his fold, but he will get over it

You notice Dave never talks about the science. He spends a ton of time talking about the motivations of people.

Even Dave cant touch the science so he talks about Al Gore hoping no one notices he only has zingers and no facts
 

Forum List

Back
Top