ENOUGH....Time for Gun Control....NOW

There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?
 
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?
He is a lying ass Democrat. They lie, defend liars and expect their leaders to lie, engage in fraud and rigged voting systems.

DeadpoolGunsMake_zpsf5gdhbqn.jpg
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
putting words out there I never said? nice. You show such character in here, you whiney toon.
 
Active Shooter at Oregon High School

BREAKING: Reports of active shooter at high school near Portland | Q13 FOX News

PORTLAND — There were multiple reports of an active shooter around 8:30 a.m. at a high school in Troutdale, Oregon.

According to the Columbian Newspaper, area police requested assistance from Clark County Washington sheriff’s deputies at Reynolds High School in Troutdale, Ore. to respond to calls of a possible shooting.

Read more: BREAKING: Reports of active shooter at high school near Portland | Q13 FOX News



Sorry, children. It's time to make it harder to get your shiny, dangerous toys. Too many loonies out there. Every week now.

The "GOOD GUY WITH A GUN" at Walmart ended up in the hospital in Las Vegas. SO there goes that Wayne LaPierre bullshit myth.
What is the law that would have stopped this? Please share.
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
Safer for who? Criminals or everyone else?
 
Why don't we just require licenses -- like we do for cars?
It would reduce gun sales and we can't have that. We only have about 300 million of them.
How would requiring licenses, like we do for cars, reduce gun sales?
The licensing that I have heard discussed can involve delaying the sale; that is the license would not be purchased from the gun dealer. Any delay in sales will result in a reduction in sales because people often have second thoughts.
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
putting words out there I never said? nice. You show such character in here, you whiney toon.

Wow, insults.
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
Safer for who? Criminals or everyone else?

Well, people are less likely to become criminals and the people are less likely to be victims.
 
yes now that there has been a spike in gangs breaking into zoos

and slaughtering the animals for food in the socialist utopia of Venezuela

there has been a renewed effort to disarm the citizens

 
Why don't we just require licenses -- like we do for cars?
It would reduce gun sales and we can't have that. We only have about 300 million of them.
How would requiring licenses, like we do for cars, reduce gun sales?
The licensing that I have heard discussed can involve delaying the sale...
This isn't how licensing works for cars...?
The purpose of vehicle licensing is to establish clear ownership and to tax motorists. The reasons for licensing guns is much different.
 
There is a shooter, so let's make sure everyone is completely unarmed and at the mercy of the next shooter that comes along.

Seriously, why on earth do you think that makes any sense whatsoever?

Perhaps because in countries with proper gun control there are less killings.

You might think what you're saying is logical, but it's not really.

The last school shooting in the UK was in 1996. With a population 1/5 the size of the US, you'd expect there to be one every few years under your logic.
Another naive citizen. Knives? Cats? Trucks? Where is it you draw a line for the innocent?

Seems you'll only draw the line at Muslims, hey?

I just prefer living in a safer society, I don't know about you, you don't seem to.
Safer for who? Criminals or everyone else?

Well, people are less likely to become criminals and the people are less likely to be victims.





Factually incorrect. Guns don't make you turn into a criminal save in the fevered imaginations of the brain dead.
 
Why don't we just require licenses -- like we do for cars?
It would reduce gun sales and we can't have that. We only have about 300 million of them.
How would requiring licenses, like we do for cars, reduce gun sales?
The licensing that I have heard discussed can involve delaying the sale...
This isn't how licensing works for cars...?
The purpose of vehicle licensing is to establish clear ownership and to tax motorists. The reasons for licensing guns is much different.





Agreed. it is to deny the People of the ability to challenge an illegitimate government. That's why billionaires are funding the anti gun legislation. They want you to be a proper, obedient slave. If you're armed though, they can't do it.
 
It would reduce gun sales and we can't have that. We only have about 300 million of them.
How would requiring licenses, like we do for cars, reduce gun sales?
The licensing that I have heard discussed can involve delaying the sale...
This isn't how licensing works for cars...?
The purpose of vehicle licensing is to establish clear ownership and to tax motorists. The reasons for licensing guns is much different.





Agreed. it is to deny the People of the ability to challenge an illegitimate government. That's why billionaires are funding the anti gun legislation. They want you to be a proper, obedient slave. If you're armed though, they can't do it.
I suppose that can be. However, licensing can also be a way to insure gun owners are trained in the safe handling of their weapons, and a way to keep guns out of the hands of convicted felons and people that are mentally unstable and to provide a database of gun owners so police can determine who owns a gun used in a crime, or to return guns lost, stolen, or taken by the police in the commission of a crime. It all depends on the law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top