EPA, Election Year, and Consumption Data: Broad Marketing

[Abishai100]

While there continues to be nagging debaters on both sides of the 'verifiability of global warming' discussion, what is not debatable is the notion that ecosystem capacity can be strained by pressures such as population explosion.

When the Earth is unable to absorb the pressures placed upon it, it "cleans itself" (i.e., Ice Age).

What is most useful is the use of data. For example, is the handsomely-industrialized First World producing more damaging CFCs than the lesser-developed Third World? If so, by how much? Such data analysis helps us evaluate the systemic patterns of 'ecosystem erosion.'

Do you encourage your kids to recycle their plastic water bottles? Do you try to carpool to work to reduce fuel consumption? Do you purchase energy-efficient light bulbs for your home which last longer and save money long-term?

In order for the citizenry to feel inspired by eco-consciousness, there has to be satisfactory information exchange in the media/Internet about basic industrialization-related data.

This is why the concerns of the EPA are more important now than ever in election time ("What does finance-wizard and presidential candidate Donald Trump think about eco-waste?").



CFC by Country

 

[Abishai100]

Donald Trump says, "We will cure Sewer Sue"


Public perceptions of environmental deterioration, sometimes urbanization-related (i.e., sewage/drainage management systems in high-traffic tourism-heavy cities such as Amsterdam, Holland and Quebec, Canada), has people talking about the 'culture of eco-symposia.'

Are you buying your kids water-guns this summer? What do you tell them when they ask you, "Is it true that Earth's waters are very polluted?" Do you feel good about your correspondence/monitoring of current American politicians?

The media seems fertile for continued liberal talk about environmentalism-gauged political critique.