Bell Huey
Diamond Member
reread my original reply, Askholio. You’ll figure it out eventuall.Explain the rules, then we can both play.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
reread my original reply, Askholio. You’ll figure it out eventuall.Explain the rules, then we can both play.
Prove you aren't a moron.Post the thread title punk.
I have given you the Citations over and over and over. You need one again? Are you this STOOPID?We can tell....by the Narrative Dependence.
But then, citations consistently prove hostile to you assertions.
No...reread my original reply, Askholio. You’ll figure it out eventuall.
Every time you cite something you find yourself running from it.I have given you the Citations over and over and over. You need one again? Are you this STOOPID?
I accept your surrender.Prove you aren't a moron.
all the info and citations you will need are here:Every time you cite something you find yourself running from it.
This is particularly true of your own words.
Not more irrelevant twaddle, Tiny.all the info and citations you will need are here:
The Act included a "grandfather clause" to allow for possession and transfer of weapons and ammunition that "were otherwise lawfully possessed on the date of enactment."[17]
![]()
Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
At any time you can show what I posted is incorrect.
Accept your defeat.
For what? You have the citiations you once again whined about. You lose.I accept your surrender.
Those are the citations you whined about, PP.Not more irrelevant twaddle, Tiny.
What is your point?For what? You have the citiations you once again whined about. You lose.
No one has asked about any of that..Those are the citations you whined about, PP.
1. If you legally owned one it was grandfathered.
2. and the ban was nothing but a visual feature ban.
you lose.
My point is you are full of anti concerning the part of the discussion I replied to And have no clue what you are talking about.What is your point?
That 55 year old ammosexuals ARE an effective bulwark against tyranny?
Stop commenting about topics in which you are clueless.No one has asked about any of that..
And stop offering your interpretations. You're an idiot.
I accept your surrender.
I didn’t run from it. You are running.Every time you cite something you find yourself running from it.
This is particularly true of your own words.
If you don't understand what the thread is about, you should stop yapping.My point is you are full of anti concerning the part of the discussion I replied to And have no clue what you are talking about.
Acknolwedge you have been answered.
Ps. What do 55 year olds have to do with it?
You shouldn’t make BS comments that are easily refuted. Then run when they are.If you don't understand what the thread is about, you should stop yapping.
You're the one with no idea what the thread is about.Stop commenting about topics in which you are clueless.