Epoch Times - 80% Of Americans Aged 17 to 24 Are Unfit For Military Service. And 55 Year Old AR-15 Fetishists Are Our Defense Against Tyranny?

[Bell Huey]

How long before 2004?
Between 94 and 2004 if they already owned one they did nothing. As I have told you before it was grandfathered.

And if they didn’t own one they could buy the following, a ban compliant AR weapon. Which functions exactly the same:

View attachment 772282
Remember, the ban was all on visual features, not function.

Acknowledge you have been answered.

you are in over your head.

The5thHorseman

That is your answer to what they did prior to 2004.

 

[progressive hunter]

The5thHorseman

That is your answer to what they did prior to 2004.

he doesnt care,,,

hes just another useful idiot trolling for kicks,,

 

[Bell Huey]

he doesnt care,,,

hes just another useful idiot trolling for kicks,,

I have known him under other names and forums. 75% of the issues he posts about he has no knowledge about.

 

[The5thHorseman]

once again you surrender by making it personal,,

If you insist on relying on your opinion...

 

[The5thHorseman]

Whatever has gotten your panties in a wad.

Stoner has designed no weapon used in a school shooting.

Even under previous bans weapons were grandfathered if already owned.

The weapons being discussed are not assault rifles by DoD definition and semi autos were not designed for the battlefield.

But you can't articulate it.

One more time - your uninformed opinions are irrelevant.

 

[Bell Huey]

But you can't articulate it.

One more time - your uninformed opinions are irrelevant.

I didn’t offer opinions. I offered facts. You are offering ignorant opinions.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The5thHorseman

That is your answer to what they did prior to 2004.

No it isn't, you fucking idiot.

The vast majority of AR-15s in civilian hands were sold AFTER 2004.

Now you can go back to where you came from and tell everyone you list this argument again.

 

[progressive hunter]

If you insist on relying on your opinion...

I posted proof you only give opinions,,

 

[progressive hunter]

No it isn't, you fucking idiot.

The vast majority of AR-15s in civilian hands were sold AFTER 2004.

Now you can go back to where you came from and tell everyone you list this argument again.

he never said different,,

 

[The5thHorseman]

I didn’t offer opinions. I offered facts. You are offering ignorant opinions

You're lying.

 

[progressive hunter]

You're lying.

if he lied then whats the truth??

 

[Bell Huey]

No it isn't, you fucking idiot.

The vast majority of AR-15s in civilian hands were sold AFTER 2004.

Now you can go back to where you came from and tell everyone you list this argument again.

Here is your question:

What did America do BEFORE 2004?

Nothing about after 2004. I have only reposted it twice with the reply function.

Do you wish to CHANGE your question.

And of course Ar 15 style weapons were in civilaian hands. They were designed SPECIFICALLY for civilians.

And know there are at least 20 million in ctheir hands.

 

[Bell Huey]

Whatever has gotten your panties in a wad.

Stoner has designed no weapon used in a school shooting.

Even under previous bans weapons were grandfathered if already owned.

The weapons being discussed are not assault rifles by DoD definition and semi autos were not designed for the battlefield.

The5thHorseman

None of that is a lie or an opinion.

 

[Bell Huey]

all the info and citations you will need are here:

The Act included a "grandfather clause" to allow for possession and transfer of weapons and ammunition that "were otherwise lawfully possessed on the date of enactment."[17]

Federal Assault Weapons Ban - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

At any time you can show what I posted is incorrect.

Accept your defeat.

The5thHorseman

The grandfather clause I spoke of is a fact. Not an opinion or lie. Rad it this time.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Here is your question:

What did America do BEFORE 2004?

Nothing about after 2004. I have only reposted it twice with the reply function.

Do you wish to CHANGE your question.

And of course Ar 15 style weapons were in civilaian hands. They were designed SPECIFICALLY for civilians.

And know there are at least 20 million in ctheir hands.

That's right, you fucking dumbass..

How did this mythical militia hope to achieve this goal pre-2004 when there were 90% fewer AR-15s in civilian hands?

They were designed SPECIFICALLY for civilians.

That is complete bullshit.

Daniel Defense posted social media ads showing its AR-15 with a helmeted soldier in a war zone under “USE WHAT THEY USE.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2023/ar-15-america-gun-culture-politics/

 

[The5thHorseman]

The5thHorseman

The grandfather clause I spoke of is a fact. Not an opinion or lie. Rad it this time.

Tiny,

Irrelevant.

 

[Bell Huey]

The5thHorseman

Here is another link I have given you multiple times over the years. A semi auto is not an assault rifle by DOD definitio.


By DOD and the US Army semi automatics are not assault weapons.

The U.S. Army defines assault rifles as "short, compact, selective-fire weapons that fire a cartridge intermediate in power between submachine gun and rifle cartridges."[18] In this strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:[2][3][4]

• It must be capable of selective fire.
• It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistolbut less than a standard rifle or battle rifle; examples of intermediate cartridges are the 7.92×33mm Kurz, the 7.62×39mm and 5.56×45mm NATO.
• Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable box magazine.[5]
• It must have an effective range of at least 300 metres (330 yards).

Rifles that meet most of these criteria, but not all, are not assault riflesaccording to the U.S. Army's definition. For example:

• Select-fire M2 Carbines are not assault rifles; their effective range is only 180 metres (200 yd).[19]
• Select-fire rifles such as the Fedorov Avtomat, FN FAL, M14, and H&K G3 main battle rifles are not assault rifles; they fire full-powered rifle cartridges.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
• Semi-automatic-only rifles with fixed magazines like the SKS are not assault rifles; they do not have detachable box magazines and are not capable of automatic fire

 

[The5thHorseman]

The5thHorseman

None of that is a lie or an opinion.

Stoner has designed no weapon used in a school shooting


An uninformed lie.

 

[Bell Huey]

That's right, you fucking dumbass..

How did this mythical militia hope to achieve this goal pre-2004 when there were 90% fewer AR-15s in civilian hands?




That is complete bullshit.

Daniel Defense posted social media ads showing its AR-15 with a helmeted soldier in a war zone under “USE WHAT THEY USE.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2023/ar-15-america-gun-culture-politics/

That is how it is marketed. And they do not have a weapon with the name AR 15. A style maybe.

 

[Bell Huey]

Stoner has designed no weapon used in a school shooting


An uninformed lie.

Which one did he design and what school shooting was it used in.