Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What compromise have you seen or heard in the last 7 years from her? She is V.P, you know that right?
Lankford followed marching orders from trump, as all others with an R....to kill voting in the bill.Oh nonsense. How bills ",generally work" is just a cheap excuse to dodge the question. Your gods won't be pleased with such dishonesty.
So yes. We agree the fraud border bill was a scheme to add funding for Ukrainec with a mere pittance used for US border security. And yes, Lankford bailed on the bill.
Lankford Votes ‘No’ on Dems Attempt to Use the Border as Political Prop - Senator James Lankford
CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on YouTube. CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on Rumble. WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) spoke on the Senate floor ahead of a vote on the Senate Democrats’ partisan push on the border security package. The bill failed on a vote of 43-50...www.lankford.senate.gov
No, she will give a load of money to some friendly company, who will then do nothing but disappear the money, a good portion of which will then find its way into her bank accounts.I'm sure she will build something down there.
It won't be enough to have an impact, rather, it will just be to say she did something
It's like the Biden inflation bill. It did NOTHING to curb inflation, but he was credited for doing "something" because it was labeled an inflation bill.
Or is it like EV's. They do not emit carbon but when you charge them you are using fossil fuels.
Their "solutions" to problems are only designed to make you feel good, but solve nothing. In fact, what they do just makes things overall worse.
NOPE!This is how pathetically
No, she's not! She's campaigning against the current Administration, she's an outsider
Ain't dat right, IM2
Oh nonsense. How bills ",generally work" is just a cheap excuse to dodge the question. Your gods won't be pleased with such dishonesty.
No. The Republicans rejected the border bill and later passed the Ukraine funding...which kind of implies the opposite of what you are claiming.So yes. We agree the fraud border bill was a scheme to add funding for Ukrainec with a mere pittance used for US border security. And yes, Lankford bailed on the bill.
Lankford Votes ‘No’ on Dems Attempt to Use the Border as Political Prop - Senator James Lankford
CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on YouTube. CLICK HERE to view the floor speech on Rumble. WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) spoke on the Senate floor ahead of a vote on the Senate Democrats’ partisan push on the border security package. The bill failed on a vote of 43-50...
www.murphy.senate.gov
Trump turned thumbs down on that Biden/Harris bill because it would have allowed 2,000,000 migrants into the country every single year before no more could be admitted. . . UNLESS they said they were afraid in which case more could come in. And it was worded to make it far more difficult for the next President to get any kind of control of the border. In other words it was not border control at all but a massive legalized migrant admission bill.
Not sure why you think that represents all the wall that was built during the Obama administration.As for the Obama/Biden border wall:
"Obama Administration Ends High-Tech Border Fence
"January 14, 2011 / 10:21 PM EST / AP
WASHINGTON - The Obama administration on Friday ended a high-tech border fence project that cost taxpayers nearly $1 billion but did little to improve security. Congress ordered the high-tech fence along the border with Mexico in 2006 amid a clamor over the porous border, but it yielded only 53 miles of protection. . ."
Obama Administration Ends High-Tech Border Fence
High-Tech Border Fence Project That Cost Taxpayers Nearly $1 Billion Did Little to Improve Securitywww.cbsnews.com
Make excuses as you will for the fraudulent Ukraine slush fund money tied to US border securityLol. So you think bills don't usually more then one thing being voted on per bill?
Wow. Talk about a disconnect from reality.
No. The Republicans rejected the border bill and later passed the Ukraine funding...which kind of implies the opposite of what you are claiming.
And yes, Lankford tanked the bill because Trump told him to this proving my point.
Trump didn't want border security, he wanted a wedge issue to run on.
What a weak pathetic man child Trump is.
Murphy Announces Reintroduction Of Bipartisan Border Bill: My Hope Is That Republicans Will Choose This Country Over Donald Trump's Campaign | U.S. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut
WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Chairman of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, on Wednesday spoke on...
“You don't have to listen to me. Senator McConnell said it out loud. Senator Lankford said it out loud. The reason that this bill was defeated 98 days ago is because Donald Trump told Republicans that it's better for Republicans to keep this issue alive and to not change the law to secure the country.
“But Republicans voted against it, with the exception of four of our colleagues, for one reason, and one reason only. President Trump said it would be better for Republicans to keep this issue open to keep the border a mess. Better for Republican presidential and congressional campaign prospects. So [tonight], I will reintroduce this legislation.
NOPE!
The Biden admin has supported strategic wall building or repairing throughout his entire administration.... Y'all just are regurgitating what your talking heads told you in your one-sided media against alk things Biden.....
www.usmessageboard.com
You’re drunk again on propaganda. Come back to Earth Hollie let’s have a real conversationWith fake "parole", catch and release along with flights dumping dumping illegals into the US under cover of darkness. Illegals were clearly imported. What a ridiculous fraud you tried to perpetrate.
Claiming the wall that Harris had flip flopped on is somehow different that Trump's wall. That her wall is magically not "racist" or "medieval" or a "waste of money" or simply a "vanity project"Another what?
Hmmm $650 million vs $18 Billion how in the world could you pretend that’s apples to apples? Get realClaiming the wall that Harris had flip flopped on is somehow different that Trump's wall. That her wall is magically not "racist" or "medieval" or a "waste of money" or simply a "vanity project"
Make excuses as you will for the fraudulent Ukraine slush fund money tied to US border security
How weak and pathetic of Harris who was opposed to "racist" walls but now is fine with such "racism".
You need to let go of your emotional attachment to Trump. You have quite the obsession.
I need not seek their help. I have made the journey and found the one true God.Seek help from your gods.
Hmmm $650 million vs $18 Billion how in the world could you pretend that’s apples to apples? Get real
Becacase we know she's full of shit. She's simply mouthing these words in the hopes of deceiving ill informed voters.And why aren’t yall celebrating her if you think she is supporting an initiative that you find important?
You're ignorant of the facts or in denial. Either way, You offered nothing but a screeching tirade absent any facts.You’re drunk again on propaganda. Come back to Earth Hollie let’s have a real conversation
www.google.com
Bills "frequently submitted this way" is all you have? You yous acknowledge that bills aren't always submitted with slush fund amounts that have nothing to do with the bill's purpose.It's not an excuse. It's a fact that bills are frequently submitted this way.
Your ignorance is not an excuse.
I don't know what you blabbering about.
Can you focus on the discussion instead of injecting your grievance into every post.
This isn't about me. It's about how Trump rejected the bipartisan bill because he wanted to run on the border.
I need not seek their help. I have made the journey and found the one true God.
I will pray that you have the courage someday to do the same.
Good luck!
Who made fun of no tax on tips?
Bills "frequently submitted this way" is all you have? You yous acknowledge that bills aren't always submitted with slush fund amounts that have nothing to do with the bill's purpose.
Can you focus on trying to offer a coherent comment not connected with you not hurling your gods at me?
Trump rejected an actual bipartisan bill because he wanted to run on the border issue.Itveas not just Trump who rejected the phony border bill. You need to get past your schoolgirl fascination with Trump.
You don’t really believe that do you??NOPE!
The Biden admin has supported strategic wall building or repairing throughout his entire administration.... Y'all just are regurgitating what your talking heads told you in your one-sided media against alk things Biden.....
Look at his funding for the wall.
Oh I don’t think k a wall can be racist. His rhetoric around the wall definitely stirred up a lot or racism and hate though. Don’t see how anybody could deny thatSo Trump's wall is racist because hed had to replace 400 miles that CLinton, Bush, Obama neglected? THat's your argument? LOL
Really? So you don’t think if that bill hit her desk she would sign it? Even after saying she would on the campaign trail?Becacase we know she's full of shit. She's simply mouthing these words in the hopes of deceiving ill informed voters.
