‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

Maybe I missed it, but what evidence is Schiff talking about? In plain sight? Like meetings where no one has seen any evidence of any collusion? And the Steele dossier? The one that was used Russians as the source? The one that was paid for by Hillary and the Dems, to an organization that does hit pieces on candidates? THAT dossier?
Just START with over 100 clandestine meetings with Russian agents...all lied about

Can you point to any other country where they did that?
 
Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.
Collusion is not a crime.

"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?
Collusion?
We have the Internet.
Trump farts and it’s headline news.
What non-tech society do you live in where you’re not up to date to the minute?

I caught Rudy's walkback. I'd be surprised if he can walk any other way these days. I'm surprised at the idiocy of re-bleating it, carrying - as it does - the unspoken admission of a partner in collusion.

Colluding 'with whom' would be the next logical question.
I have also caught Rudy repeatedly bitch slapping your Liberal media reporters.
Now thats funny.
 
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says



‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”
Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.
Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence? Those ARE actual facts.
 
Collusion is not a crime.

"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?

Rudy said there was collusion…just not done by Blob Sr.

Riiiight.

Yep. Collusion isn't a solo activity. They should say, "collusion with a Russian Intelligence Agency isn't a crime."

“Collusion” was brought up by Trump. Conspiracy is the crime. Conspiring to hack a computer is a crime.
Wrong. The "collusion" magic Ju-Ju word was repeated by snowflakes like you and the fake news media ad nauseum for months. To be convicted of "conspiracy," you have to conspire to commit an actual crime. Conspiring to stage a surprise birthday party is not a crime.

Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime. It seems more and more the blob is guilty.
 
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says



‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"
Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.
 
Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”
Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.
Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence? Those ARE actual facts.


And yet again she is not in jail or even being investigated for a crime. You’ve guys been trying to pin something on her for 25 years.

Any day now…right?
 
bill n loretta on a tarmac out from public view while hillary is on trial.

go.

Trial? I think you're deflecting to a non-event.



Still betting on Russia!! ?


:abgg2q.jpg:

Nah. Unfitness covers it. I don't think Russia would actually let Trump in on anything. What would be the point? He'd fuck it up.



Just checking to see if you had any rendezvous with reality since you flounced from our thread.

I see you have not.


Speaking of unfitness, I imagine , as any American patriot, you are horrified by the revelations by dirty cop McCabe and the sedition he was involved with.


You oughta go back and review the postings from 2 years ago. if you had an intellectually honest bone in your body, you would concede we have been right all along about the deep state conspiracy to protect Hillary and destroy President Trump. ( Who is my new hero.)

Since day one we called the Deep State activities vs Trump an attempted coup and that his election had ZERO to do with Russia! Indeed, we know now that the collusion conspiracy was by the dirty cops at FBI and DOJ and CIA , and Hillary and her campaign ;and, the Mueller investigation was a cover-up all along.

The quality and substance of our respective news sources could not be more clear. You all have been proven wrong at each and every turn.

You nutbag cultists who believe in TDS, and who think opposition to Trump indicates hatred, aren't worth a second. Keep your idiotic conspiracies. You came posting to me. I'm fine without your stupidities.
The way you foam at the mouth whenever his name is mentioned is what indicates hatred.

Who do you think you're fooling?
 
Collusion is not a crime.

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.
So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.
There's no evidence to support that claim.
 
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says



‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"
Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

I’m sure Mueller has other evidence than Stone’s tweet. He’s batting 1000 in putting the collar on Trump-hired felons. I don’t think his perfect record is in any danger.
 
and who think opposition to Trump indicates hatred, aren't worth a second


Opposition?

Is not what we are talking about.

Most clearly.

Blind hatred, lies, smears, a failure to report truth and to focus almost exclusively on negatives and critiques, and criticisms most often with out any balance or attempt at fairness. Never addressed when proven wrong.

Seen a lot of reporting on the MSM re the Senate Investigative Committee's findings re Trump/Russia! ??

The headlines of late are replete with a classic case in point. The MAGA Supporting Evil White Nationalists who beat up the poor gay, black, gay , actor , who is gay, and black, by the way, Jussie Smollett. His fraud and the media chorus slamming Trump supporters al part of the " opposition">? .

And mostly, the failure and refusal to HONESTLY reflect on past errors driven by this rabid emotional reactions to all things Trump.

If you want to play stupid ( easy for you) and pretend " opposition " is what we refer to? Then I realized why we do not miss your mendacious ass .

The examples of Trump hatred , TDS, is literally ubiquitous. For you too conflate the meaning to include a spirited loyal opposition is breathtaking in its sheer disingenuousness.

Thanks for the reminder.
 
Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence?

If that were accurate...you'd think in two years that Trumps DOJ would have prosecuted...or the GOP Congress would have done something.

None of that happened though
 
‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says



‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"
Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

I’m sure Mueller has other evidence than Stone’s tweet. He’s batting 1000 in putting the collar on Trump-hired felons. I don’t think his perfect record is in any danger.
You TDS snowflakes are always talking about this secret evidence Mueller supposedly has. You do that because you know you haven't got jack shit. You're just postponing the day of reckoning when you all have to admit that you're just a bunch of delusional, gullible, mentally unstable paranoiacs.
 
Collusion is not a crime.

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.
So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.
There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419
 
Collusion is not a crime.

"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?
Collusion?
We have the Internet.
Trump farts and it’s headline news.
What non-tech society do you live in where you’re not up to date to the minute?

I caught Rudy's walkback. I'd be surprised if he can walk any other way these days. I'm surprised at the idiocy of re-bleating it, carrying - as it does - the unspoken admission of a partner in collusion.

Colluding 'with whom' would be the next logical question.
I have also caught Rudy repeatedly bitch slapping your Liberal media reporters.
Now thats funny.
Thanks for admitting you don’t watch the news.
 
"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?

Rudy said there was collusion…just not done by Blob Sr.

Riiiight.

Yep. Collusion isn't a solo activity. They should say, "collusion with a Russian Intelligence Agency isn't a crime."

“Collusion” was brought up by Trump. Conspiracy is the crime. Conspiring to hack a computer is a crime.
Wrong. The "collusion" magic Ju-Ju word was repeated by snowflakes like you and the fake news media ad nauseum for months. To be convicted of "conspiracy," you have to conspire to commit an actual crime. Conspiring to stage a surprise birthday party is not a crime.

Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime. It seems more and more the blob is guilty.
What crime?
 
Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.
He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"
Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

I’m sure Mueller has other evidence than Stone’s tweet. He’s batting 1000 in putting the collar on Trump-hired felons. I don’t think his perfect record is in any danger.
You TDS snowflakes are always talking about this secret evidence Mueller supposedly has. You do that because you know you haven't got jack shit. You're just postponing the day of reckoning when you all have to admit that you're just a bunch of delusional, gullible, mentally unstable paranoiacs.

You said the same thing about Flynn. He got caught
You said the same thing about Manafort (twice). He got caught.
You’re saying the same thing about Stone…. Stay tuned.
 
Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”
Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.
Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence? Those ARE actual facts.


And yet again she is not in jail or even being investigated for a crime. You’ve guys been trying to pin something on her for 25 years.

Any day now…right?
Politics is funny isn't it? You have evidence and nothing is done with one politician.
And, with another, you have nothing and you keep making shit up to pin on him.

Maybe with the new DOJ justice will be served.
It really is too bad that the criminal didn't get elected....even with the shenanigans in her favor.
She could have just swept everything under the rug and no one would have been wiser.
You could have just kept on being a good little dolt and not have to cover for the criminal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top