‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

[Indeependent]

Collusion is not a crime.

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.

So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

What exactly is an indictment?
My wife indicts me when I forget to do the dishes.

 

[Care4all]

Conspiracy is.
Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is. That is what happened to the DNC and Mr. Podesta.
More and more it looks like it was done at the behest of the Trump campaign.

prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.

Mueller indicted the 13 GRU agents FOR that hack stupid.

Ask HIM for the proof

Read Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling - CNNPolitics

show me the dnc hack part.

There's your problem. Wrong indictment

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

Items 2,3,4

phishing is tricking someone to giving you their email account info.

not a hack.

Hacking and phishing are related in that they are both ways of obtaining information, but they differ in their choice of methods. A phish, which is ultimately a hack, occurs when a user is baited with an email, phone call, or, perhaps, a text message and tricked into “voluntarily” responding with information.

----------------------------

Hackers can also use phishing as one vector in an attack with the goal of obtaining personal information that will help facilitate their break-in.

What’s the Difference between Hacking and Phishing?

Both are illegal, both could be used to BREAK IN and STEAL information.

Why do you think phishing and stealing emails is any less of a CRIME than hacking and stealing emails?? Do you have some sort of point you are trying to make???

 

[bripat9643]

Collusion is not a crime.

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.

So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

ROFL! Failing to remember sending a text is not "lying." That's all Mueller's got. The charges are beyond absurd.

 

[candycorn]

"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?

Collusion?
We have the Internet.
Trump farts and it’s headline news.
What non-tech society do you live in where you’re not up to date to the minute?

I caught Rudy's walkback. I'd be surprised if he can walk any other way these days. I'm surprised at the idiocy of re-bleating it, carrying - as it does - the unspoken admission of a partner in collusion.

Colluding 'with whom' would be the next logical question.

I have also caught Rudy repeatedly bitch slapping your Liberal media reporters.

Now thats funny.

Thanks for admitting you don’t watch the news.

I usually listen to NPR on the way to and from work and read AP on the web. Watching theater is something I only do when I visit New York.

 

[bripat9643]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”

Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.

Faulty syllogism. There are many crooks who aren't in prison. Most of them work for the government.

 

[candycorn]

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.

So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

ROFL! Failing to remember sending a text is not "lying." That's all Mueller's got. The charges are beyond absurd.

Yet he’s been indicted.

 

[candycorn]

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”

Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.

Faulty syllogism. There are many crooks who aren't in prison. Most of them work for the government.

Most worked for the blob it seems.

What happened to his “hiring the best people”? LOL

 

[bripat9643]

Maybe I missed it, but what evidence is Schiff talking about? In plain sight? Like meetings where no one has seen any evidence of any collusion? And the Steele dossier? The one that was used Russians as the source? The one that was paid for by Hillary and the Dems, to an organization that does hit pieces on candidates? THAT dossier?

Just START with over 100 clandestine meetings with Russian agents...all lied about

Can you point to any other country where they did that?

That's total horseshit, and even you knows it.

 

[bripat9643]

So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

ROFL! Failing to remember sending a text is not "lying." That's all Mueller's got. The charges are beyond absurd.

Yet he’s been indicted.

How does that prove the charges are not absurd?

 

[Otium]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"

Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

I’m sure Mueller has other evidence than Stone’s tweet. He’s batting 1000 in putting the collar on Trump-hired felons. I don’t think his perfect record is in any danger.

That is the entire idea. Regardless of truth as it relates to his mandate, by charging and convicting folks of process crimes ( crimes that had not existed prior to his investigation and were produced as a direct result of his investigation) he provides a narrative for lesser informed, gullible and partisan folks to point to the quantity of actions taken vis a vis the quality.

The sum total of all Mueller's actions to date strongly suggest that he has ZERO.

 

[bripat9643]

Wow! You can connect the dots with that kind logic, yet can't connect the dots with Hillary being such a crook.
I'm flabbergasted.....flabbergasted I tell ya.

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”

Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.

Faulty syllogism. There are many crooks who aren't in prison. Most of them work for the government.

Most worked for the blob it seems.

What happened to his “hiring the best people”? LOL

Not worth a substantive response.

 

[Meister]

Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence?

If that were accurate...you'd think in two years that Trumps DOJ would have prosecuted...or the GOP Congress would have done something.

None of that happened though

You call that a DOJ? Trump has a DOJ now.
The republican congress had to deal with a swamp creature that had a DOJ title.

 

[task0778]

Maybe I missed it, but what evidence is Schiff talking about? In plain sight? Like meetings where no one has seen any evidence of any collusion? And the Steele dossier? The one that was used Russians as the source? The one that was paid for by Hillary and the Dems, to an organization that does hit pieces on candidates? THAT dossier?

Just START with over 100 clandestine meetings with Russian agents...all lied about

Can you point to any other country where they did that?

That's total horseshit, and even you knows it.

Conspiracy is.

Unauthorized use of a computer network (hacking) is.
Conspiring to commit Unauthorized use of a computer network is.

Stone did it. Likely at Trump’s behest.

So which member of the Trump admin is guilty of conspiracy?

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

What exactly is an indictment?
My wife indicts me when I forget to do the dishes.

No doubt an indictment followed by a swift conviction. You re not alone.

 

[Billy_Bob]

"No collusion" is no longer operative, I see.

Interesting fallback. Cleared with the GRU?

Rudy said there was collusion…just not done by Blob Sr.

Riiiight.

Yep. Collusion isn't a solo activity. They should say, "collusion with a Russian Intelligence Agency isn't a crime."

“Collusion” was brought up by Trump. Conspiracy is the crime. Conspiring to hack a computer is a crime.

Wrong. The "collusion" magic Ju-Ju word was repeated by snowflakes like you and the fake news media ad nauseum for months. To be convicted of "conspiracy," you have to conspire to commit an actual crime. Conspiring to stage a surprise birthday party is not a crime.

Conspiracy to commit a crime is a crime. It seems more and more the blob is guilty.

You should be well versed in this.. Collusion with foreign agents to get a FISA warrant...Collusion to unlawfully remove a sitting president...

 

[bripat9643]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"

Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

I’m sure Mueller has other evidence than Stone’s tweet. He’s batting 1000 in putting the collar on Trump-hired felons. I don’t think his perfect record is in any danger.

What a load of horseshit. Mueller is batting 1000 at drilling dry holes. Most of his indictments are of people that can never go to trial and probably don't even exist.

 

[Lesh]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

He knew no such thing. If fact we still don't know any such thing. No one has demonstrated that the emails were hacked.

You are unaware of his tweet saying it would be “Podesta’s turn in the barrel"

Which proves exactly nothing. Assange had been hinting at more releases of incriminating emails for weeks before Stone tweeted that. I would love to see Mueller try to convict Stone based on that.

From the New Yorker. Report: Trump Associate Roger Stone Colluded With Email Hackers

A court document apparently drafted by Robert Mueller and obtained by NBC and CNN cites emails that prove that Corsi was in contact with WikiLeaks and, more importantly, that he passed on what he knew to Roger Stone.

According to the document, Stone emailed Corsi on July 25, 2016: “Get to (Assange) [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending (WikiLeaks) emails.”

On August 2, Corsi, having evidently carried out this directive, emailed Stone:

Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct. Impact planned to be very damaging. Time to let more than [the Clinton Campaign chairman] to be exposed as in bed w enemy if they are not ready to drop HRC [Hillary Rodham Clinton]. That appears to be the game hackers are now about. Would not hurt to start suggesting HRC old, memory bad, has stroke – neither he nor she well. I expect that much of next dump focus, setting stage for Foundation debacle.

 

[iceberg]

prove it was hacked. fbi never got to look at it. theres proof of a lot more turmoil internally than there, is of hacking. someone also fell for a phishing campaign. their own stupidity.

Mueller indicted the 13 GRU agents FOR that hack stupid.

Ask HIM for the proof

Read Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for election meddling - CNNPolitics

show me the dnc hack part.

There's your problem. Wrong indictment

https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download

Items 2,3,4

phishing is tricking someone to giving you their email account info.

not a hack.

Hacking and phishing are related in that they are both ways of obtaining information, but they differ in their choice of methods. A phish, which is ultimately a hack, occurs when a user is baited with an email, phone call, or, perhaps, a text message and tricked into “voluntarily” responding with information.

----------------------------

Hackers can also use phishing as one vector in an attack with the goal of obtaining personal information that will help facilitate their break-in.

What’s the Difference between Hacking and Phishing?

Both are illegal, both could be used to BREAK IN and STEAL information.

Why do you think phishing and stealing emails is any less of a CRIME than hacking and stealing emails?? Do you have some sort of point you are trying to make???

where did i say it was a lesser crime?

 

[candycorn]

You guys have been investigating Hillary for 25+ years. You haven’t pinned anything on her yet.
So tell me, how is she a crook.

Meister: “I’ll take the deep-state value meal with a swamp reference on the side”

CSR: “Drink”

Meister: “Trump koolaid”

Destroying evidence and lying to congress? I guess with democrats it's business as usual.
Just what have you pinned on Trump? innuendos

Now go it crow, young lady.

“go it crow”? LOL

Again, if she was a crook…she’d be in jail by now. Instead she isn’t. Why do you think that is?

As for your blob…the investigation into the multiple Trump scandals continues. That and the multiple felons he hired and have plead/been found guilty to their multiple crimes.

Yes, she is a crook, how can someone knowingly lie to congress and destroy evidence? Those ARE actual facts.

And yet again she is not in jail or even being investigated for a crime. You’ve guys been trying to pin something on her for 25 years.

Any day now…right?

Politics is funny isn't it? You have evidence and nothing is done with one politician.
And, with another, you have nothing and you keep making shit up to pin on him.

No….

You have nothing and it shows. Hillary is still free as a bird. She withstood hours of committee investigations and questioning in person.

Your blob runs from investigators.

Says all one needs to know about the two people. Your blob is a coward.

Maybe with the new DOJ justice will be served.

I’m sure Mueller is quite capable. Batting a thousand putting Trump hires in jail for all manner of crimes.

BTW: That is a good thing right?

It really is too bad that the criminal didn't get elected….

Yes he did.

 

[Oddball]

Hacking and phishing are related in that they are both ways of obtaining information, but they differ in their choice of methods. A phish, which is ultimately a hack, occurs when a user is baited with an email, phone call, or, perhaps, a text message and tricked into “voluntarily” responding with information.

----------------------------

Hackers can also use phishing as one vector in an attack with the goal of obtaining personal information that will help facilitate their break-in.

What’s the Difference between Hacking and Phishing?

Both are illegal, both could be used to BREAK IN and STEAL information.

Why do you think phishing and stealing emails is any less of a CRIME than hacking and stealing emails?? Do you have some sort of point you are trying to make???

Related, not the same.....My third cousin is related too.

In any event, the means by which the incriminating material is immaterial to the criminal acts committed....That's how shit works when you get caught...You distract from the fact by screeching about how that incriminating evidence was obtained.

 

[candycorn]

Admin? Probably Trump.
Campaign? Stone knew about a hacked computer 6 weeks before the hacked documents were made public.
So likely Stone and Trump.

There's no evidence to support that claim.

Except the indictment of Stone for lying to House investigators looking into Russian Meddling.

Stone Indictment 012419

ROFL! Failing to remember sending a text is not "lying." That's all Mueller's got. The charges are beyond absurd.

Yet he’s been indicted.

How does that prove the charges are not absurd?

I guess we’ll see when he’s tried, convicted, and flips.

I’m sure you’ll toss him under the bus too when he flips.