Eviscerating 'The Roosevelt Alibi'

[Correll]

The RW hates the inclusion of the third freedom in FDR's Four Freedoms.

Fox News has been telling these righties what makes them comfortable for enough years now, almost 20, that they'll believe anything their only source for cable news tells them...no matter how contradictory to reality it is

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

 

[Dot Com]

If they didn't, you wouldn't be carping about 'em.


Caught you in another lie, huh?

Think about making concise points PC and actually having evidence to support them
Posting endless, unrelated material does not help you

Hard to imagine why a loser like you would imagine that his advice wouldn't be the cause for universal laughter.

Where would your threads be without me coming in to salvage them?

True. ZERO Rightists respond to her threads, truth be told.

We come in to mock them.....righties just say WTF and walk away

apparently so.

 

[Correll]

h convinced people to care about their fellow Americans

I hope the government never "cares about" you enough to throw you into a concentration camp the way that fucking scumbag FDR did to so many innocent, loyal Americans.

Alright dude, I get it, the internment camps consume you.

All right "dude" I get that concentration camps are just fine with you as long as they are built on the order of a democrat.

In 1942 what was worse? The Japanese internment camps or lynchings in the south?

That was the era we are talking about

I agreed that the internment camps should be judged by the standards of the times.

I guess it goes almost without saying that you hold a similar view when other leftest like to slam the Founding Fathers for (some of them) being slave owners?

 

[rightwinger]

Fox News has been telling these righties what makes them comfortable for enough years now, almost 20, that they'll believe anything their only source for cable news tells them...no matter how contradictory to reality it is

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

 

[rightwinger]

h convinced people to care about their fellow Americans

I hope the government never "cares about" you enough to throw you into a concentration camp the way that fucking scumbag FDR did to so many innocent, loyal Americans.

Alright dude, I get it, the internment camps consume you.

All right "dude" I get that concentration camps are just fine with you as long as they are built on the order of a democrat.

In 1942 what was worse? The Japanese internment camps or lynchings in the south?

That was the era we are talking about

I agreed that the internment camps should be judged by the standards of the times.

I guess it goes almost without saying that you hold a similar view when other leftest like to slam the Founding Fathers for (some of them) being slave owners?

Yup and expecting Christopher Columbus to act like a 21st century gentleman

 

[Correll]

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Not invading two years earlier, based on Stalin's demands, and over US generals advice was obviously the right call.

It was also not a difficult call.

Such an act rates about a C grade.

 

[rightwinger]

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Not invading two years earlier, based on Stalin's demands, and over US generals advice was obviously the right call.

It was also not a difficult call.

Such an act rates about a C grade.

Quite true....you might even say no brainer

But it does show that FDR was not in Stalins pocket like you and PC claim

 

[Dot Com]

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Is this what OP wanted? I'd have to say, based on her posting history- yes

 

[Correll]

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Not invading two years earlier, based on Stalin's demands, and over US generals advice was obviously the right call.

It was also not a difficult call.

Such an act rates about a C grade.

Quite true....you might even say no brainer

But it does show that FDR was not in Stalins pocket like you and PC claim

NOt pissing away tens or hundreds of thousands of American lives is a pretty low bar you are setting for your beloved FDR...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Is this what OP wanted? I'd have to say, based on her posting history- yes

A pile of disgorged entrails has more class than you have.

Bet you're tired of hearing that from everybody.

 

[rightwinger]

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Not invading two years earlier, based on Stalin's demands, and over US generals advice was obviously the right call.

It was also not a difficult call.

Such an act rates about a C grade.

Quite true....you might even say no brainer

But it does show that FDR was not in Stalins pocket like you and PC claim

NOt pissing away tens or hundreds of thousands of American lives is a pretty low bar you are setting for your beloved FDR...

Low bar?

FDR minimized our involvement until we could invade with relatively low casualties allowing Stalin to steam and take 90% of the casualties

Doesn't sound like he was a stooge of Stalin to me

 

[Unkotare]

The GOP talking points in this book found there [sic] way to you through conservative media electioneering efforts

The stupid assumptions you keep repeating found THEIR way to you through an obama-genitals bong.

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

 

[rightwinger]

The GOP talking points in this book found there [sic] way to you through conservative media electioneering efforts

The stupid assumptions you keep repeating found THEIR way to you through an obama-genitals bong.

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

Did I tell you how I used to be a porn star?

You still smell like poop

 

[Unkotare]

The stupid assumptions you keep repeating found THEIR way to you through an obama-genitals bong.

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

Did I tell you how I used to be a porn star?...

Sounds like something a low-life like you would want to do.

 

[regent]

[QUOTE

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Can anyone imagine the field day the Anti-FDRs would have had if we had invaded before we were ready. No landing craft, no air cover of consequence, no nothing, nothing but a waste of American lives. Could we have even stayed on the beach? Maybe that's why they are so upset, the landing was successful.

 

[toxicmedia]

Fox News has been telling these righties what makes them comfortable for enough years now, almost 20, that they'll believe anything their only source for cable news tells them...no matter how contradictory to reality it is

RW was giving FDR credit for getting Stalin to fight the Nazi.

How believable it that?

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

I'm pretty sure you missed his point, at least if I haven't also, but delaying our participation in the European theatre, caused expenditures by the German Wermacht that could have been spent on American troops.

That seems so simple to me, I must be missing some other aspect of your assertion

 

[toxicmedia]

Credit for not engaging US troops when we were not ready. Stalin demanded a second front at every meeting, FDR waited two years while Russians were being killed by the millions.
And you and PC whine about how Stalin got the best of him

No, you repeatedly mentioned that he got Stalin to fight the Nazi as a return on the aid being given to him.

FDR got Stalin to do the fighting and dying
For two years, all we brought to the party was North Africa and lend lease

No. Hitler got Stalin to the fighting and dying. He did this clever stunt by invading the Soviet Union with the stated intent of conquest and genocide.

FDR deserves no credit for that.

FDR could have invaded two years earlier like Stalin wanted

Would have killed hundreds of thousands additional Americans. But it would have saved Soviet lives

Not invading two years earlier, based on Stalin's demands, and over US generals advice was obviously the right call.

It was also not a difficult call.

Such an act rates about a C grade.

I thought you righties embraced the concept that "the buck stops here"

But now of course, when a Democratic President presides over the killing of Bin Laden, or staying out of the European theatre during the big one, makes a Democrat look good...not so much buck stopping anywhere near the presidents.

Admit it, you're unwilling to give a Democrat credit for anything good, and you're perfectly willing to blame any Democrat for everything bad.

 

[toxicmedia]

The GOP talking points in this book found there [sic] way to you through conservative media electioneering efforts

The stupid assumptions you keep repeating found THEIR way to you through an obama-genitals bong.

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

You HAVE NOT TAUGHT history for decades, and studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages.

You're projecting, and lying

 

[Unkotare]

The stupid assumptions you keep repeating found THEIR way to you through an obama-genitals bong.

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

You HAVE NOT TAUGHT history for decades, and studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages....

Yes I have, and tomorrow I'll continue. You, on the other hand, will just whine, deflect, and play the apologist for the worst scumbag ever to soil the White House.

 

[toxicmedia]

I don't smoke weed, or pole. And in case you forgot, I didn't vote for Obama.

I learned about Russian-American relations during and after WWI from multiple sources, and you're just parroting revisionism from one hopelessly biased source.

Oh yeah, make that two sources, your angry relatives, and the only camp you've been to was sixth grade summer camp.

Wait, three sources, a biased hit piece book, angry relatives, and the GOP

Stupid assumptions are NOT scholarship, you ignorant buffoon.

I've TAUGHT history for decades, chump. I've studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages. How about you, fool?

I used to be a French model

Your inferiority complex seems well-deserved.

You HAVE NOT TAUGHT history for decades, and studied hundreds of texts and primary documents in several languages....

Yes I have, and tomorrow I'll continue. You, on the other hand, will just whine, deflect, and play the apologist for the worst scumbag ever to soil the White House.

It's far more likely that RW used to be a French model.

But that's the beauty of the internet...because on any given thread, when I poster makes an entirely unoriginal, and irrational argument, they can simply claim to have invented the internet.

Can you provide a link to any of the hundreds of texts and primary documents...... in several languages that support your position on this matter?