Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like how you use the term reject, as I can't reject something that to me doesn't exist. But I don't see any empirical evidence sitting around that says that if there even is a god, that it has to be Christian. The Egyptian crocodile that gobbles people up in the afterlife was around several thousand years before Christianity even came on the scene. Hell doesn't scare me, nor do crocodile gods.Those that opppse the existence of a 'GOD' like anti-theists and non-deists wouldn't be deceived by an 'anti-Christ', but people who don't think for themselves and just follow a cult church like Westboro would be his perfect flock.No, that will never happen, but the AntiChrist will show up and tell you he is GOD and you will buy it hook line and sinker.
Yes, unfortunately there will be many that call themselves Christians that will follow the Anti-Christ. The spirit of antichrist (little "a") is already prevalent throughout society and churches today (1 John 4:3). Those claiming to be "good people" are prime examples of it.
And yes, unfortunately if you continue to reject Christ, you will accept the mark of the beast. He will present himself as a fleshly god that you can see with your eyes and will present lying signs and wonders.
If you could see how ridiculously childish your sinful actions are you would say "that will never happen" or I would never do that", but because your eyes are blinded by lust you think it is perfectly normal.
Romans 1:19-24
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
Similarly it will be at the coming of the Anti-Christ (2 Thes 2):
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
I hope that you reconsider before that time, but if you don't, remember that I told you so.
odd, then how did he lie?.....In fact, God's never actually said anything to anyone.
I never said he did. Invisible people can't talk, everyone knows that.
It isn't prophecy. It's deductive reasoning. If you really want to present creationism as a science, you're going to have to learn the difference.
odd, usually deductive reasoning involves facts and reason.......what is your new methodology?.......
You're being intellectually dishonest. There's nothing new about what I'm saying.
I was also talking about evolution. Deductive reasoning is not a delusion. It's how we arrive at truth. If you say the apparent age of the earth and the progression of the fossil record are delusions, then you're in effect saying that God lies to us.
well no....God did not tell you there was a progression in the fossil record.....thus, he did not lie to you....
If God created everything including my brain and the fossil record is laid out in an apparent progression that isn't true, yes, he does lie to us.
well no....God did not tell you there was a progression in the fossil record.....thus, he did not lie to you....
In fact, God's never actually said anything to anyone.
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
odd, usually deductive reasoning involves facts and reason.......what is your new methodology?.......
you're being intellectually dishonest. There's nothing new about what i'm saying.
there has to be....no one has ever demonstrated deductive reasoning on the issue before......what are the facts on which you base your conclusion?.....here's a single celled organism.....deductive reasoning tells you it evolved into a human being.....show us fact number one that starts the whole reasoning process......
In fact, God's never actually said anything to anyone.
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
well no....God did not tell you there was a progression in the fossil record.....thus, he did not lie to you....
If God created everything including my brain and the fossil record is laid out in an apparent progression that isn't true, yes, he does lie to us.
why?.....there are other alternatives.....for example, you could be lying to yourself and he has nothing at all to do with it......
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
That wasn't the question. It's possible, though. Were all the conversations recorded?
odd, then how did he lie?.....
I never said he did. Invisible people can't talk, everyone knows that.
lol....typical brainless atheist......joins in an argument, then pretends the argument has nothing to do with him......okay, you are not engaged in the argument......you have not, nor will you contribute anything to it......understood.......
odd, usually deductive reasoning involves facts and reason.......what is your new methodology?.......
You're being intellectually dishonest. There's nothing new about what I'm saying.
there has to be....no one has ever demonstrated deductive reasoning on the issue before......what are the facts on which you base your conclusion?.....here's a single celled organism.....deductive reasoning tells you it evolved into a human being.....show us fact number one that starts the whole reasoning process......
In fact, God's never actually said anything to anyone.
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
Can you eliminate the possibility/probability that the Bible was simply a set of stories that were made up by human storytellers?
you're being intellectually dishonest. There's nothing new about what i'm saying.
there has to be....no one has ever demonstrated deductive reasoning on the issue before......what are the facts on which you base your conclusion?.....here's a single celled organism.....deductive reasoning tells you it evolved into a human being.....show us fact number one that starts the whole reasoning process......
Simple, DNA.
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
That wasn't the question. It's possible, though. Were all the conversations recorded?
If God created everything including my brain and the fossil record is laid out in an apparent progression that isn't true, yes, he does lie to us.
why?.....there are other alternatives.....for example, you could be lying to yourself and he has nothing at all to do with it......
It isn't just me. You are also saying that millions over almost two centuries are having the same delusion. If you believe that it's a delusion, you must have some evidence. Please state it.
I never said he did. Invisible people can't talk, everyone knows that.
lol....typical brainless atheist......joins in an argument, then pretends the argument has nothing to do with him......okay, you are not engaged in the argument......you have not, nor will you contribute anything to it......understood.......
It's because you can't read. I wasn't the one who said god lied. But I may have said that he's a homo because he wanted Adam not to bang the chick and stay in homobliss heaven with him.
You're being intellectually dishonest. There's nothing new about what I'm saying.
there has to be....no one has ever demonstrated deductive reasoning on the issue before......what are the facts on which you base your conclusion?.....here's a single celled organism.....deductive reasoning tells you it evolved into a human being.....show us fact number one that starts the whole reasoning process......
The ability of two single cells, a sperm and an egg, to merge and eventually become a fully formed human being.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
That wasn't the question. It's possible, though. Were all the conversations recorded?
those are questions YOU should be answering.....you're the one claiming God lied about the progression of fossils....
I thought the Bible was literally true? If so he spoke to Adam, Abraham , Moses, etc. Sorry, but that line of argument FAILS. You can't say one part of the story is literally true in all its aspects, but then reject others at your convenience.
when he spoke to Adam, Abraham, Moses, etc., did he ever once say...."oh by the way, those fossils?.....they are in a progressive line of development".........
Can you eliminate the possibility/probability that the Bible was simply a set of stories that were made up by human storytellers?
