danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
Our Bill of Rights, is not a Constitution unto itself; they don't have their own, legal Standing without our federal Constitution.If the 2nd amendment was meant as the left says it was........
WHY THE HELL WOULD IT APPEAR IN THE BILL IF RIGHTS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Clue, it wouldn’t
We aren't governed by any part of the Bill of Rights. We are governed by the Constitutions of the United States and the many States. As nice and lofty as the Bill of Rights is, it's just another piece of parchment, nothing more.
But the Bill of Rights is part of the US Constitution.
Yes, but the Bill of Rights is not the Constitution. It's a seperate document that has no legal standings. The Constitution did take it's first 10 amendments from it but the constitution is more than that and is the law of the land. The Bill of Rights is just a supporting document. Anyone states that we must follow the bill or rights over the Constitution doesn't get my support.
It is not a matter of the Bill of Rights OVER the US Constitution. The Bill of Rights is PART of the US Constitutions. Those amendments are TO the US Constitution. To pretend they are separate documents is incorrect.