Facebook Goes Full Fascist Mode

Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

You are attempting to justify behavior that is unjust and despicable.

Perhaps there were times when a judge was not available, in the past. But that is not the reason for the lynchings. Your hypothetical situation would be so rare as to be statistically irrelevant, especially in the 20th century.

You are just trying to cover for your own favoring of murderous lynching.
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

Funny, when that 14 year old boy was released by police you were all about criminal behavior. You wanted him lynched. You even claimed the order had gone out and it couldn't be stopped.
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

You are attempting to justify behavior that is unjust and despicable.

Perhaps there were times when a judge was not available, in the past. But that is not the reason for the lynchings. Your hypothetical situation would be so rare as to be statistically irrelevant, especially in the 20th century.

You are just trying to cover for your own favoring of murderous lynching.
I just want a answer to what you would do lawman! The men are Chewing at the bit to get this son of a bitch! Come on law man! This income puts good on your table! Do you want to get voted out? Big decisions! Law man!
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

Funny, when that 14 year old boy was released by police you were all about criminal behavior. You wanted him lynched. You even claimed the order had gone out and it couldn't be stopped.
What boy?
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

Funny, when that 14 year old boy was released by police you were all about criminal behavior. You wanted him lynched. You even claimed the order had gone out and it couldn't be stopped.
What boy?

The one detained and then released in the investigation of the murder of the young woman.
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

Funny, when that 14 year old boy was released by police you were all about criminal behavior. You wanted him lynched. You even claimed the order had gone out and it couldn't be stopped.
What boy?

The one detained and then released in the investigation of the murder of the young woman.
Link? I forgot
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.
 
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?
Face book whether they like it or not is our public online form, we should stay and fight for free speech.

Or, you could start your own social media app.

That would be an excellent idea. Old school conservatism praised initiative and creating for yourself. Pity that is forgotten.
The average American thinks they’re joining a site where it’s a public forum they can share ideas and create business accounts buy space ads, share pictures with friends and family..
If they all had the warning sign ** WE ARE UNAMERICAN WE WILL DELETE YOUR VIEWS** then you will see more platforms .. and a judge will get that to happen

If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.

I see stuff from both sides. I guess maybe you are just too radical (and dangerous) for FaceBook to handle, huh?
Do you even understand why this topic was created Facebook is deleting post about people meeting in a location to assemble in protest lol

I have seen personal posts and news posts about the protests. I am not a member of any group that would attend, so I wouldn't see the call to attend or where meetings are held.

And, as I said before, it is a privately owned business. So your claims of them violating the US Constitution are bullshit.
Do you think when we reopen America is a central political question?

Indeed it is. Just not the question for this thread.
Is it being discussed by billions on Facebook? Hehe

I am pretty sure there are more pictures of cats than there are discussions of when we reopen businesses. Maybe that should be the topic?
Lol the country and the world is on lock down and you don’t think that’s a major discussion?? I know I got you backed in you backed in to a corner, and you can get out. But please

You haven't backed me into any corner. Apparently you want to change the subject. But the subject of the thread is what it is. Stick with it.
Hahahha I WON! Deflected! Yes!! 1001- O

LMAO! You are simply delusional. This thread is about FaceBook censorship. The fact that I refuse to allow you to make it about whether or not businesses reopen is not a deflection.
But that’s what they are deleting it for .. that’s the censorship.. you going to pretend you don’t have a clue now? Lol

They are deleting posts because billions are discussing it? lol
They are censoring a major central political question.

So you claim that billions of people are discussing it. But then you claim FaceBook is censoring those conversations.

If FaceBook is censoring the conversation, how do you know people are having them?

I have seen quite a few posts about reopening businesses. Both Pro and Con.
How do I know people are having them on Facebook? Is that a serious question? This issue has political ramifications. Facebook cannot shut out one voice at this level. Or they need to record it in the books for political influence. PERIOD

I am not saying the conversations are not being held. It is not billions of people having it. But a good number of them.

I was just mocking your claims that the conversations are being censored and that billions of people are having it.
Ok Stalin

Ok liar.

And BTW, I am far more accurate.
OK Stalin

Hmmmm

Have I ever talked about killing or imprisoning people for their political beliefs?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever talked about unwavering dedication to the state?
No, I have not. But you have.

Have I ever wanted to remove an entire ethnic group from the country?
No, I have not. But you have.


Sounds like you resemble Stalin far more than I do.
Shutting down free-speech which you support Will take five more lives then this virus

That is an outright lie. I do not support shutting down free speech. I defy you to show where I have.

You demanding that a privately owned business provide you with a platform for your free speech is certainly closer to socialism than anything I have posted. I agree with private property being private property. Apparently you want to be able to commandeer private property whenever you want.

Yeah, I think you are a lot closer to Stalin than I will ever be.
Lol it’s a platform many people use, and if it’s going to influence elections the people have a right to know. You talk about Facebook like it’s a small pizza joint down the road lol .. so dumb

Nothing I have said was even close to me claiming it is a small pizza place down the road.

But whether it is a tiny business or a tech giant does not change anything where your free speech is concerned. You have a right to free speech. You do not have a right to someone else's privately owned business to support your free speech.
We’ll see what the Supreme Court says, Some of them are very good constitutionalist when you lose I want you to get in your hands and knees and beg me for forgiveness

I am happy to wait to see what the US Supreme Court says. I think they will say private property cannot be co-opted for your political free speech.

I have already shown you to be more like Stalin than I am. And now you demand that private property be forced to support your political free speech. And your repeated desires to see people lynched without a trial? Stalin would be proud. You just need the mustache and you would be Stalin. I am very much unStalin-like.
Campaign finance laws

You know, you have a lot of gall to bitch about FaceBook influencing elections. When, for the last 6 months you have maintained that you intend to demand that duly elected officials surrender to you and be removed from office, either willingly or by force.

You really are a hypocrite of the lowest order. You want the system to work for you, even when it shouldn't. But other times you consider yourself above the system.

The only saving grace is that you haven't got the balls to actually DO anything. This past Saturday was 6 months since you announced your intended "coup". And other than some wild claims & lies, you have not done a single thing.
We are in a pandemic in BU cancel this fall semester so all my college Republicans are gone for the season.. but I continue to fight with all the weight on my shoulders I carry forward to fight for freedom and justice an American way.

Fight to remove duly elected people from office? And in your spare time you get on a political forum and complain about someone influencing elections? lmao

If you can't see the irony there, I can't help you.
In a peaceful manner of course.. Who says this is on Facebook?

LOL!! That is why you talked about having an army? Or why you claimed to be talking with the Trump administration about using the US Marine Corp reserves? Riiight.

Do you really expect elected officials to step down because YOU want them to? Or accept going to jail when they have broken no law?
If we get signatures to have every Democrat in Boston removed and they are refusing to be moved, Then I would call on the trumpet ministration to send us arms to peacefully remove them

How many signatures do you think you need?

The voters basically gave you their signatures when they voted. Will you have as many signatures as the Democrats had in votes?
We both know Democrats shut down speech in Boston which you agree with so that means the voters of Boston didn’t get the opportunity to listen to a different opinion

No, I do not agree with shutting down free speech. Repeating the same lie does not make it the truth.

And your assumption that the only reason democrats were elected is because of the ignorance of the Boston voters is nonsense. One rally was stopped. Campaigns still had commercials on tv and radio. In this day and age, the only reason someone does not hear a different opinion is because they don't want to hear a different opinion.
How can you raise money if you can’t talk?

You can talk. You showed where one rally was shutdown because of the threat of a riot. If your entire political campaign depends on a single rally, you were dead in the water anyway.

I wonder, do you fight as hard for the rights of those you disagree with? Actually I don't wonder that. You have shown you do not. Your fight for rights is very self-centered.

If you supported THE GOV'T shutting down a political rally in the public square, he's got you. That's anti-free speech.

If I had supported it, yes he would be correct.

But I did not support it. Not in the least.

If that's true than so far you support free speech as outlined in the Constitution. I don't LIKE that Facebook doesn't allow free speech on their platform and think it's smarmy of them, but it's not unconstitutional. Lots of people do not realize that free speech only guarantees Americans the right not to be prosecuted for speech by the government. It does not mean private companies will let you say whatever you like wherever you like.

I mean witness the rules at USMB for an example. They can have rules because free speech is limited.
I agree with you but according to campaign finance laws if they’re going to use their platform to influence elections then they need to pay a price

Agree with that but that's not freedom of speech
Well if they advertise as a public forum to share ideas they have some answering to do.. and I think all Americans should want all public forms to be a free space for speech. Or have a warning sign that your site promotes left wing ideology

It doesn't matter what you want. The reality is that private property is still private property.
Will let the Supreme Court decide hehe

Fine by me.

The US Supreme Court has also ruled on the limitations of the 1st amendment.
In the future supreme court probably very soon will nullify that decision so stop drooling pull the pants up And act like a man live under the original Constitution and federal list papers

I don't know why you think that. There has been no serious opposition to the ruling.

And before you tell me to live under the original constitution, you should probably apologize to all the victims of lynching for your remarks defending their being murdered.
Why would I ? It was the people’s decision to hand down punishment. Mini gave that authority to a certain person in the town usually it was a sheriff somebody deputized where they would hire a law man.. that’s America

And just to clarify, "The People" did not hand down any decision. A handful of rednecks decided to lynch someone, and did it. Guilt or innocence was not an issue for them. Hell, in many cases there was nothing that they were guilty of except being black.
Don’t like American justice move out.. awwww hell yeah!!

That is NOT American justice. American justice follows the US Constitution. What you are defending if violent, ignorant rednecks trying to keep blacks in line.

And no, I am not moving out. I am part of the general public who stands up to those cowards and and stops them. Rather than see anyone be murdered, in violation of their constitutional rights, I will start shooting the assholes trying to do the lynching.
What’s wrong with keeping blacks in line aren’t they equal to whites

Yes, they are. But the ignorant assholes who favor lynching apparently don't think so. And too many were lynched for bogus reasons or no reason at all, like 14 year old Emmett Till or 18 year old Michael Donald.
Idk I grew up with blacks they were very disrespectful to woman,, and them country boys don’t play.. we warned you once ,, thats all you get.. hehe

That was the way it was. But not any more. Now the perpetrators will be stopped or they will be tried and sentenced for their crimes.

And just FYI, being disrespectful is not a capital offense.
why can’t we confront them? With guns?

You can. As long as you know that if you shoot them, you will be prosecuted.

And if you lynch innocents, you will be found, prosecuted and either put to death or spend the rest of your life in prison.
What if I confront him
And say hey stop sexually harassing my sister! And then he text me can I shoot him then?

Is sexual harassment a capital offense in Boston?
Attacks me**

If he attacks you, then you can defend yourself. But that is a far cry from what I have been talking about with the lynching. Those were crowds attacking a single person. And, as I have said over and over, many times for nothing.
Blacks were lynched whites were lynched.. it’s American history. Some deserved it’s one didn’t. There are black men going to be lynched this weekend in Chicago I see you sitting on your fat dirty lazy ass doing nothing about it so don’t pretend you care about some fucking black kid from fucking 90 years agoYou fucking fraud

A gun fight between gang members is not a lynching. And whether it was deserved or not, it still violates the constitutional right to a trial. Your excuses that they shouldn't have raped white women or that white men were lynched too is just pathetic.

There were numerous innocent black men who were lynched for no reason. I've named a few. You choose to ignore that.

Getting pretty hostile aren't you? At least I am not a hypocrite for claiming the constitutional rights are sacred, and then advocating and defending denying those rights to other citizens.
So a gang planning on looking for someone who shot there friend yesterday, with the intention of killing them isn’t a Lynching? What’s the difference? MIC DROP

And in that case, it would at least be for something they did. But still it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Lol

But comparing vigilante justice with street gang murders is pretty appropriate. Both are murders and neither is even close to American justice.
You don’t have to live here

Neither do you.

I am not leaving the best country on earth because of a few assholes.
You will

No, I won't. But you are welcome to leave any time.
The way you feel about free speech.. you should pack up now

Oh, are you planning to ban free speech? Because I have adamantly spoken in favor of free speech. I have simply not expected to be able to commandeer other people property to do it.

How about you? Considering your defense and advocacy of lynching, your plans to throw out people's votes, and your plans to arrest people who have broken no laws, you should be packing and sneaking out soon.
Let me ask you a hypothetical question.. this virus extends for another 10 years, your town in Georgia now becomes a small little community where you all are in commerce together, let’s say you’re the town blacksmith, and law man. you guys don’t have a lot of money to put together for a judge a sheriff because there’s almost no crime..Some outsider comes then rapes and kills A sweet little 14-year-old girl you watched grow up... Now your town has been handling petty crime in the community with Concession decisions. The town has given you the responsibility of handing down criminal decisions because you can’t afford a judge you can’t afford a sheriff. Now you have a town of men that want to go get this guy.. what do you do?

Once again you are trying to make it about not having access to judges or law enforcement. That is utter bullshit.

There were lynchings as recently as the 1980s that fit exactly what I have been talking about. Those ignorant rednecks did what they did because of hate, not a lack of judges.
You’re talking about criminal behavior. I’m against criminal behavior what I’m asking you is a situation the towns all across America once faced.. many towns were pioneered and carved out. What would you do in a hypothetical question I asked you. Law man!

Funny, when that 14 year old boy was released by police you were all about criminal behavior. You wanted him lynched. You even claimed the order had gone out and it couldn't be stopped.
What boy?

The one detained and then released in the investigation of the murder of the young woman.
Link? I forgot

The Tessa Majors case. She was a student at Barnard College.

One of your comments is my signature. You know "fuck the constitution"?
 
I've almost completely stopped checking it at Facebookburning.

I'm using WhatsApp, Zoom and Messaging to keep in touch.

Can you imagine had Hillary won?

Facebookburning, Twitter, et. al. Are ALL violating their commitment under the Telecommunications Act that they are platforms, not content providers.


I guess you don't know WhatApp is owned by facebook. What a dumbass you are.

Screw Facebook and WhatApp, I use Instagram! oh wait...... lol
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.
If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.
If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.
 
I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.
There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.
If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.
It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out
 
I haven't noticed any fascism on FaceBook. I see political posts from both sides.

I also see friends and family from all over the world able to communicate easily. I see solid information posted and nonsense challenged and debunked.

I don't see problem with using the social media according to their rules. They own the platform.
You know the far right fascists don't like it when they can't post all the hate they want........thus threads like this one complaining.
 

Forum List

Back
Top