Facebook Goes Full Fascist Mode

[Jitss617]

Of course I can go out in public and speak you moron lol
Except democrats try to stop it when they want.

And this is why I do not take you seriously.

Yes, your right to speech is indeed protected, but that does not protect you for the contents of that speech. This has been proven many times in court. For example, anything intended to incite violence, sedition against the government, anger or hatred towards others, that is not protected and indeed the government can shut you down for it.

And I always find it fascinating when people resort to petty insults because somebody does not agree with them. Basically all that tells me is that such an individual should never be taken seriously, they have absolutely no control over their emotions, and will rant and rave and slam others just because they do not agree.

Kinda like an ANTIFA or OWS protestor. Or a lot of Democrats.

*laughs*

90% of all daily violent crimes happen in towns run by democrats, by your standards we should stop democrats for from speaking politics ... I agree let’s do it

You know, one of the reasons I have always been a conservative (of the old school variety) is that they took responsibility for their lives. You have certainly not done that. It is always someone else's fault.

Where did I mention my self?

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

 

[WinterBorn]

Of course I can go out in public and speak you moron lol
Except democrats try to stop it when they want.

And this is why I do not take you seriously.

Yes, your right to speech is indeed protected, but that does not protect you for the contents of that speech. This has been proven many times in court. For example, anything intended to incite violence, sedition against the government, anger or hatred towards others, that is not protected and indeed the government can shut you down for it.

And I always find it fascinating when people resort to petty insults because somebody does not agree with them. Basically all that tells me is that such an individual should never be taken seriously, they have absolutely no control over their emotions, and will rant and rave and slam others just because they do not agree.

Kinda like an ANTIFA or OWS protestor. Or a lot of Democrats.

*laughs*

90% of all daily violent crimes happen in towns run by democrats, by your standards we should stop democrats for from speaking politics ... I agree let’s do it

You know, one of the reasons I have always been a conservative (of the old school variety) is that they took responsibility for their lives. You have certainly not done that. It is always someone else's fault.

Where did I mention my self?

No where. My comment was in general, and then I specifically pointed you out. And it is accurate.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

 

[Jitss617]

Of course I can go out in public and speak you moron lol
Except democrats try to stop it when they want.

And this is why I do not take you seriously.

Yes, your right to speech is indeed protected, but that does not protect you for the contents of that speech. This has been proven many times in court. For example, anything intended to incite violence, sedition against the government, anger or hatred towards others, that is not protected and indeed the government can shut you down for it.

And I always find it fascinating when people resort to petty insults because somebody does not agree with them. Basically all that tells me is that such an individual should never be taken seriously, they have absolutely no control over their emotions, and will rant and rave and slam others just because they do not agree.

Kinda like an ANTIFA or OWS protestor. Or a lot of Democrats.

*laughs*

90% of all daily violent crimes happen in towns run by democrats, by your standards we should stop democrats for from speaking politics ... I agree let’s do it

You know, one of the reasons I have always been a conservative (of the old school variety) is that they took responsibility for their lives. You have certainly not done that. It is always someone else's fault.

Where did I mention my self?

No where. My comment was in general, and then I specifically pointed you out. And it is accurate.

We can discuss why oppression is spread through out democrat run towns if you want..

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

You’re the one that brought up lynching as something that bad and outrageous even thou it goes on daily and you do nothing about it.. just when it fits your narrative

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

Booo hooo. It’s going to happen today.. who cares

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

Booo hooo. It’s going to happen today.. who cares

FaceBook won't give you your right to free speech? Booo hooo

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

You’re the one that brought up lynching as something that bad and outrageous even thou it goes on daily and you do nothing about it.. just when it fits your narrative

No, I brought up your approval and defense of lynching as a way to show you don't give a shit about constitutional rights unless you want them. Then they are inviolate and sacred.

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

Booo hooo. It’s going to happen today.. who cares

FaceBook won't give you your right to free speech? Booo hooo

Well no surprise you hate free speech

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

You’re the one that brought up lynching as something that bad and outrageous even thou it goes on daily and you do nothing about it.. just when it fits your narrative

No, I brought up your approval and defense of lynching as a way to show you don't give a shit about constitutional rights unless you want them. Then they are inviolate and sacred.

Because once upon a time lynching was a way of getting punishment. That’s life

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

Booo hooo. It’s going to happen today.. who cares

FaceBook won't give you your right to free speech? Booo hooo

Well no surprise you hate free speech

Not even close. I just hate whiny little assholes who demand the use of private property for their own agendas.

 

[WinterBorn]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

You’re the one that brought up lynching as something that bad and outrageous even thou it goes on daily and you do nothing about it.. just when it fits your narrative

No, I brought up your approval and defense of lynching as a way to show you don't give a shit about constitutional rights unless you want them. Then they are inviolate and sacred.

Because once upon a time lynching was a way of getting punishment. That’s life

So when the police released the 14 year old suspect in the murder of the Barnard student, and you called for lynching him, that was "once upon a time"?

For you "once upon a time" must have been December of 2019.

On Dec 26, 2019, in a thread you started concerning the release of the 14 year old suspect, you posted the following:

“This kid should be in jail or worse. And you wonder why we had lynching”

“I’m down to get some boys from the swamp take them up to NYC do some ....”

“I said the swap because my mercenary buddies are down in Florida,, they got that lynching in der blood ya here”

“To late it’s been ordered”

“Anybody know this boys address asking for a friend”

And the following day, on Dec 27, 2019

“It’s time we take the LAW IN OUR OWN HANDS!”

“The central park five? They were guilty as sin! This little boy needs to be caught! THE ORDER HAS BEEN SENT!”



So don't pretend it was ever about the history of the old west.

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Bullshit. The people discussed above were murdered. There are not two sides. There is the truth and there is bullshit.

The woman who accused Emmett Till of harassing her later recanted and admitted she made it up.

The other two lynchings were well publicized and investigated. The mother of Michael Donald ended up owning the kkk's property.

These are true stories of despicable behavior, murder and the denial of 6th amendment rights. And you claim there are two sides to every story? LMAO!! That is so weak. Stand up for everyone's constitutional rights or quit whining about yours.

If that is true then that’s criminal behavior I do not condone criminal behavior I stated what I believe in. We are talking about how towns used to conduct punishment. Now you’re claiming him for unjustified punishment

No, WE are not discussing any such thing. You have tried to shift to that. Originally you tried the "we the people" crap, despite having no evidence that "we the people" wanted any such thing as a majority. And despite me showing you over and over that constitutional rights cannot be overridden by a simple majority.

You defended each of the case I listed.

It’s pretty simple to understand that most towns in America at one point handled a lot differently than they do today. I think you’re against American history. Unfortunately these towns weren’t rich enough to live in the land you would like.. I understand American disappoints you maybe you should move out

Its pretty simple to understand that you approve of lynching.

It is also pretty simple to see that you are all for YOUR constitutional rights, but for other's rights it is not so important.

Also, many times in the Old West, prisoners were held until the Circuit Judge came through. Then the trial was held.

BTW, all three of the cases I listed above happened in the 20th century, with two of them since 1950. And when you were first confronted with them, you defended the lynching.

As a matter of fact, when I first brought up the case of Michael Donald, your reply was "he shouldn't have raped a white woman".

OK law man! I’m
Still waiting on your decision! There is a murder out there ! What do you want to do??

Arrest him and hold him until the circuit judge comes through town.

Your jail is limited, you have holding cells of domestic violence, petty crime, you can’t hold murders now you have to spend money to feed him BOSS?? Come on law man! We want justice! Why do you do?? Looks like you’ll be voted out or you gonna lose all that money you were making as a law man because you don’t have the balls to execute that son of a bitch

Oh, so you would throw away someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars? I won't. If I have to, I'll let the domestic violence or petty crime criminals go.

You are really stretching to try to make this case. But no matter how you make up shit, lie, or create silly hypothetical situations that are so restricted as to be nonsense, you have still defended and advocated for denying people their 6th amendment rights and approved of murder.

And for you to pretend that this was ever about poor towns in the old west is just a lie.

The last lynching case I presented above was in the 1980s in Mobile Alabama. Your answer does not work. And frankly, you should be embarrassed at trying to pretend this is all about history.

lol there are lynchings every day in Boston this month lol two or three groups lynching each other ,, listen just because the social media doesn’t label it a lynching doesn’t mean it’s not. BUT IT IS

IM trying to show you how it was in America. I know it doesn’t fit your narrative, but town would be able to keep rapist murderers in their town lock up, and if you did you would be voted out. OK LAW MAN!

The narrative you are trying to show is not what the conversation began as. Nor is it what you have presented.

This is not about history of the old west. It is about much more modern times in which the ignorant grew into a mob and murdered people.

And no matter how hard you try, lynching is not about justice.

As for me being voted out for holding a criminal for trial, I am fine with that. It is far better than selling out and denying someone's constitutional rights for a few dollars. That would be despicable.

It’s American Justice .. I’m ok with it.

Then you are against the US Constitution.

And no, it is NOT American justice. It is not justice at all.

Do you know how I feel about the constitution

That you think lynching is American justice says all I need to know. That you think some rights are important and some are not, speaks volumes. And the fact that you want your rights but are fine with other citizens being denied their says it all.

I’m explaining to you how America did justice for many of years.. and that way of justice was passed on to generation to generation.. So before you attacked somebody you should realize some history

You and I discussed lynching long before you came up with this old west history nonsense.

It is a violation of the 6th amendment. And the fact that it was done in US Territories (not states) 100 or mor years ago is of no bearing.

Booo hooo. It’s going to happen today.. who cares

FaceBook won't give you your right to free speech? Booo hooo

Well no surprise you hate free speech

Not even close. I just hate whiny little assholes who demand the use of private property for their own agendas.

Ok Stalin

 

[Jitss617]

I have brought these specific cases up in our previous discussions.

Emmett Till was a 14 year old boy who was accused of whistling at a white woman (and flirting with her). A few nights later Till was abducted from where he was staying, beaten and mutilated before being shot in the head. His body was then sunk in the Tallahatchie River. This was in 1955 in the Mississippi Delta. The claim that they could not have found a judge is laughable.

You defended that.


Mary Turner was the wife of a black man who was lynched. She was also 8 months pregnant. She denounced the hanging and called out the ignorant rednecks who had done it. She threatened legal action against them. She fled after she was threatened, but the mob caught her. They hung her upside down and doused her with gasoline and lit her on fire. She was still alive when one of the mob cut her belly open and stomped on the fetus.

You defended that.


Michael Donald had committed no crime. Another black man was accused of killing a white policeman. His first trial was declared a mistrial because the jury could not come to a decision. There would be 2 more trials, with the last one seeing the man convicted. But the local kkk was angry about the mistrial. Two klansmen (cowardsmen) drove around that night with a gun and a rope, looking for a black man to attack. They found Michael Donald. They chased him, beat him, and strangled him with a rope. They then showed off the body at a party at the house of a klan elder, before hanging his body from a tree. This was in 1981.

You defended that.


Your "there was no judge" excuses do not apply to any of the above cases.

There’s two sides to every story just like the story about Nazis are untrue

Interesting....and you support the side of those who did the lynchings?

Sad, isn't it? He is fine with people being denied their 6th amendment rights, but gets pissy because FaceBook doesn't give him a platform for his speech.

White lynching blacks bad.. blacks lynching whites and blacks ... ok lol You all are hypocrites

Bullshit. I have not seen a single person say that blacks lynching whites and blacks is ok. Not one!

YOu are just flailing around trying to find any justification for lynching rather than admit you are wrong.

Well you don’t talk about it like you do white on black
So it must be ok

It must be ok? You really are a moron.

You don't talk about piracy, child rape, or cancer. Those must all be ok with you.

You’re the one that brought up lynching as something that bad and outrageous even thou it goes on daily and you do nothing about it.. just when it fits your narrative

No, I brought up your approval and defense of lynching as a way to show you don't give a shit about constitutional rights unless you want them. Then they are inviolate and sacred.

Because once upon a time lynching was a way of getting punishment. That’s life

So when the police released the 14 year old suspect in the murder of the Barnard student, and you called for lynching him, that was "once upon a time"?

For you "once upon a time" must have been December of 2019.

On Dec 26, 2019, in a thread you started concerning the release of the 14 year old suspect, you posted the following:

“This kid should be in jail or worse. And you wonder why we had lynching”

“I’m down to get some boys from the swamp take them up to NYC do some ....”

“I said the swap because my mercenary buddies are down in Florida,, they got that lynching in der blood ya here”

“To late it’s been ordered”

“Anybody know this boys address asking for a friend”

And the following day, on Dec 27, 2019

“It’s time we take the LAW IN OUR OWN HANDS!”

“The central park five? They were guilty as sin! This little boy needs to be caught! THE ORDER HAS BEEN SENT!”



So don't pretend it was ever about the history of the old west.

Good if he got Lynched the next black boy will think twice ..