- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,988
- 38,369
- 2,290
Oh. Well I just assumed everyone accepted that as a given at this point. None of the sources who are now engaging in censorship could prove the covington boy was smiling racistly but they blasted his ass all over the airwaves for it anyway.
Of course you think it is a given, all of your talk radio shows told you so. You have found him guilty of being the WB without a shred of evidence.
I don't listen to talk radio or watch fox news. I don't do twitter and barely even look at facebook anymore. Even my cat knows who the whistle blower is. It's impossible to avoid.
No, you do not know the whistle blower's name, you know the name of the person that has been accused of it without a shred of evidence. This same guy was accused of being the "leaker" back in early 2017 without a shred of evidence, and the result was death threats and him having to leave his job at the NSC because of the danger to his life.