Fact is fact, Tea Partiers are extremists

[Care4all]

*I* ain't the one constantly alluding to it sport. *YOU* have larger problems and it isn't *ME* or JHS.

okie dokie. the posts betray your claims.

have a nice day Butchie

Fact is, the thread title's no more or less true than Democrats are Extremists. Pick one, fuckwit.

Don't you lefties need to go have so gay sex cuz it's okay somewhere?

OH! MY! GAWD!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I am amused that most of the protesters hide behind the founding fathers, the flag and the Constitution. It's as if their ideas cannot stand on their own.

I'm not surprised that you don't understand.

You see our ideas are the same ones as the Founders. Liberty. Small government. Separation of powers. Low taxes.

So we dont have to hide behind people we whole heartedly agree with. Their ideas have proven to be good. So we are advocating them.

Ironically, you are admitting that you have completely different ideas. So why are you against liberty and freedom?

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

*I* ain't the one constantly alluding to it sport. *YOU* have larger problems and it isn't *ME* or JHS.

okie dokie. the posts betray your claims.

have a nice day Butchie

Fact is, the thread title's no more or less true than Democrats are Extremists. Pick one, fuckwit.

Don't you lefties need to go have so gay sex cuz it's okay somewhere?

so that 12 step program isn't working out for you? Why not try one-on-one counseling? I hear it helps a certain percentage of people.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

okie dokie. the posts betray your claims.

have a nice day Butchie

Fact is, the thread title's no more or less true than Democrats are Extremists. Pick one, fuckwit.

Don't you lefties need to go have so gay sex cuz it's okay somewhere?

OH! MY! GAWD!

this is so pathetic, I think you'll become an admin soon enough.

keep it up. you're on the right track.

{usmb sucking sound]

 

[Care4all]

No the Tea party members are not extremists on the whole, and nor are the Global Warming by man believers, or animal rights supporters, or even prolife supporters, or prochoice supporters...

They are just groups of people that have SOME of the same concerns that organize together to get their points across.

this does not mean that there are NOT some extremists out there, that join these groups.

 

[Care4all]

Fact is, the thread title's no more or less true than Democrats are Extremists. Pick one, fuckwit.

Don't you lefties need to go have so gay sex cuz it's okay somewhere?

OH! MY! GAWD!

this is so pathetic, I think you'll become an admin soon enough.

keep it up. you're on the right track.

{usmb sucking sound]

ahhhhhhhhhhhh, worried someone may outdo your time on your knees?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

OH! MY! GAWD!

this is so pathetic, I think you'll become an admin soon enough.

keep it up. you're on the right track.

{usmb sucking sound]

ahhhhhhhhhhhh, worried someone may outdo your time on your knees?

you do know I'm in a wheelchair, don't you?

 

[Avatar4321]

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

They started a rebellion because of the over taxation of a government that refused to listen to what they had to say. How on earth can you conclude that they werent concerned about taxation?

They also set up a Federal Government that had limited powers specifically so it would stay small.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

Bullcrap. Liberalism hasnt been about liberty since the progressive/socialists took it over well over a century ago. Political correctness isnt about liberty. Making people work until April to pay off their taxes isnt about liberty. Keeping people in poverty isnt about liberty. It's about power to the politicians.

And you are here attacking a group of Americans for exercising their liberty. So please dont pretend as you protect that.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

Denial is typical of someone who can't articulate a counter point. What is wrong with liberty? What is wrong with wanting to be a free people? What is wrong with wanting to keep what you earn so you can decide what to do with the fruits of your labor? Tell me please, id love to hear it.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

I think there are alot of Christians who would recognize Christ. And the Founders would be pretty obvious too.

The problem is you dont recognize either one so you think no one else does.

 

[The T]

worries? In junior high school? I was the last one you'd want to pick on. Never happened.

*I* ain't the one constantly alluding to it sport. *YOU* have larger problems and it isn't *ME* or JHS.

okie dokie. the posts betray your claims.

have a nice day Butchie

AUTOMATED RESPONSE: "Sorry but you have me confused with someone that made the accusation to start with"

Your problems run deeper than you imagine buttboy. *I Ain't The One*

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3iOpX-cQ88"]YouTube - Lynyrd Skynyrd - I Ain't The One (live '75)[/ame]

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

They started a rebellion because of the over taxation of a government that refused to listen to what they had to say. How on earth can you conclude that they werent concerned about taxation?

So we go from 'low taxes' to 'taxes'?

They also set up a Federal Government that had limited powers specifically so it would stay small.

Not true. They set up a Federal government with limited powers. They wanted to restrain what the government could do. I think the arguments about size are ridiculous, as the definition of 'size' in this context is relevant. What exactly does small government mean?

and please, do not list the limits the founders expressed, because they left us with a mechanism to alter those limits. The limits were never meant to be written in stone, in the sense that they were untouchable or not open to change.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

Bullcrap. Liberalism hasnt been about liberty since the progressive/socialists took it over well over a century ago. Political correctness isnt about liberty. Making people work until April to pay off their taxes isnt about liberty. Keeping people in poverty isnt about liberty. It's about power to the politicians.revisionist history and a poor grasp of reality is no excuse. you are ranting and raving here and attempting to pass it off as debate.

And you are here attacking a group of Americans for exercising their liberty.
oh the irony! the irony.

So please dont pretend as you protect that.
Unlike you, I can be seen sticking up for people whose ideology is in direct opposition to mine. Why? because I am a liberal.[/I]

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

Denial is typical of someone who can't articulate a counter point. What is wrong with liberty? What is wrong with wanting to be a free people? What is wrong with wanting to keep what you earn so you can decide what to do with the fruits of your labor? Tell me please, id love to hear it.
Articulate a counter point? To what? False premises, straw men, red herrings and wild rantings and ravings?

what is wrong, is you.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

I think there are alot of Christians who would recognize Christ. And the Founders would be pretty obvious too.
the vast majority of Jews did not recognize their own Christ. And Christians today have shown nothing in the way of actions to make a rational person think they are any less blind than their Jewish Predecessors were.

The problem is you dont recognize either one so you think no one else does.

I have no problem here. I see people as opponents and not enemies.

eat shit.

 

[Gunny]

I am amused that most of the protesters hide behind the founding fathers, the flag and the Constitution. It's as if their ideas cannot stand on their own.

I'm not surprised that you don't understand.

You see our ideas are the same ones as the Founders. Liberty. Small government. Separation of powers. Low taxes.

So we dont have to hide behind people we whole heartedly agree with. Their ideas have proven to be good. So we are advocating them.

Ironically, you are admitting that you have completely different ideas. So why are you against liberty and freedom?

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

Try reading a history book, goober. Try reading a few. I have ideals. They just have being a sheep for the Federal Gov't included in them. Sorry if thinking for and doing for yourself is a concept beyond your mental capacity.

Start small. Maybe the local elementary school will check you out a 1st grade primer.

I've truly given you more creidt based on the reputation that preceded you than you deserve.

Your circular arguments are fit for you and truthdoesntmatter to be locked in a room together.

 

[Care4all]

this is so pathetic, I think you'll become an admin soon enough.

keep it up. you're on the right track.

{usmb sucking sound]

ahhhhhhhhhhhh, worried someone may outdo your time on your knees?

you do know I'm in a wheelchair, don't you?

great reply! hahahahahahahaha!

You did have Care4all for a nanosecond there....feeling sorry for ya!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

*I* ain't the one constantly alluding to it sport. *YOU* have larger problems and it isn't *ME* or JHS.

okie dokie. the posts betray your claims.

have a nice day Butchie

AUTOMATED RESPONSE: "Sorry but you have me confused with someone that made the accusation to start with"

Your problems run deeper than you imagine buttboy. *I Ain't The One*

[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3iOpX-cQ88YouTube - Lynyrd Skynyrd - I Ain't The One (live '75)[/url]

still at it?

can't give it up?

I'd have to say the problem is yours.

not that there is anything wrong with that, if juvenile insults about genitalia is your cup of tea.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

Try reading a history book, goober. Try reading a few. I have ideals. They just have being a sheep for the Federal Gov't included in them. Sorry if thinking for and doing for yourself is a concept beyond your mental capacity.

Start small. Maybe the local elementary school will check you out a 1st grade primer.

I've truly given you more creidt based on the reputation that preceded you than you deserve.

Your circular arguments are fit for you and truthdoesntmatter to be locked in a room together.[/QUOTE]
I understand you take High School text books and civics classes for a reading of history and the philosophical arguments of the founding fathers, and that is okay. Seeing you area Gunny, i would expect no more and no less.

When people try and use the arguments the colonial revolutionaries had with their mother country, with arguments today---you see small minds in action. The parallels are slim to nonexistent.

Putting up the minds of the Glenn Becks and Sean Hannitys against that of the founding fathers would be laughable if it weren't so offensive.

Glenn Beck vs Sam Adams

Sean Hannity vs John Adams

Bill O'Reilly vs John Hancock

Sarah Palin vs Abigail Adams

Gunny vs George Washington

thanks for the laughs

 

[Gunny]

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

Try reading a history book, goober. Try reading a few. I have ideals. They just have being a sheep for the Federal Gov't included in them. Sorry if thinking for and doing for yourself is a concept beyond your mental capacity.

Start small. Maybe the local elementary school will check you out a 1st grade primer.

I've truly given you more creidt based on the reputation that preceded you than you deserve.

Your circular arguments are fit for you and truthdoesntmatter to be locked in a room together.

I understand you take High School text books and civics classes for a reading of history and the philosophical arguments of the founding fathers, and that is okay. Seeing you area Gunny, i would expect no more and no less.

When people try and use the arguments the colonial revolutionaries had with their mother country, with arguments today---you see small minds in action. The parallels are slim to nonexistent.

Putting up the minds of the Glenn Becks and Sean Hannitys against that of the founding fathers would be laughable if it weren't so offensive.

Glenn Beck vs Sam Adams

Sean Hannity vs John Adams

Bill O'Reilly vs John Hancock

Sarah Palin vs Abigail Adams

Gunny vs George Washington

thanks for the laughs

[/QUOTE]

I see. best you can do is pick rightwing media personalities to go against Founding Fathers. Try to stack the deck much?

Washington couldn't debate with me. Not on politics NOR military strategy and tactics. He was versed in Napoleonic doctrine. I would destroy him.

Next, fuckwit .....?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The Founding Fathers were concerned with low taxes? In what context? Small government? The Founding Fathers created what was at their time, a huge government. Federalism was a step in the direction we are at today.

Liberty and Freedom is what liberalism is about. I stand as a sentinel of those things as do every liberal worth their salt.

You have no ideas, you have slogans that fit on bumper stickers. I feel sorry for you if you even believe a fraction of the shit you spew on here day to day.

just as the Christians of today wouldn't recognize the Christ if he could come back, people like you wouldn't recognize an idea the founders had if were hit over the head with them, and you most definitely wouldn't recognize one of the Founding Fathers if you trip over one of them.

Try reading a history book, goober. Try reading a few. I have ideals. They just have being a sheep for the Federal Gov't included in them. Sorry if thinking for and doing for yourself is a concept beyond your mental capacity.

Start small. Maybe the local elementary school will check you out a 1st grade primer.

I've truly given you more creidt based on the reputation that preceded you than you deserve.

Your circular arguments are fit for you and truthdoesntmatter to be locked in a room together.

I understand you take High School text books and civics classes for a reading of history and the philosophical arguments of the founding fathers, and that is okay. Seeing you area Gunny, i would expect no more and no less.

When people try and use the arguments the colonial revolutionaries had with their mother country, with arguments today---you see small minds in action. The parallels are slim to nonexistent.

Putting up the minds of the Glenn Becks and Sean Hannitys against that of the founding fathers would be laughable if it weren't so offensive.

Glenn Beck vs Sam Adams

Sean Hannity vs John Adams

Bill O'Reilly vs John Hancock

Sarah Palin vs Abigail Adams

Gunny vs George Washington

thanks for the laughs

I see. best you can do is pick rightwing media personalities to go against Founding Fathers. Try to stack the deck much?

Washington couldn't debate with me. Not on politics NOR military strategy and tactics. He was versed in Napoleonic doctrine. I would destroy him.

Next, fuckwit .....?

are you aware of what you just said? I doubt it.

carry on

 

[Dis]

this is so pathetic, I think you'll become an admin soon enough.

keep it up. you're on the right track.

{usmb sucking sound]

ahhhhhhhhhhhh, worried someone may outdo your time on your knees?

you do know I'm in a wheelchair, don't you?

Well..that makes getting to the floor easier...

 

[Gunny]

I understand you take High School text books and civics classes for a reading of history and the philosophical arguments of the founding fathers, and that is okay. Seeing you area Gunny, i would expect no more and no less.

When people try and use the arguments the colonial revolutionaries had with their mother country, with arguments today---you see small minds in action. The parallels are slim to nonexistent.

Putting up the minds of the Glenn Becks and Sean Hannitys against that of the founding fathers would be laughable if it weren't so offensive.

Glenn Beck vs Sam Adams

Sean Hannity vs John Adams

Bill O'Reilly vs John Hancock

Sarah Palin vs Abigail Adams

Gunny vs George Washington

thanks for the laughs

I see. best you can do is pick rightwing media personalities to go against Founding Fathers. Try to stack the deck much?

Washington couldn't debate with me. Not on politics NOR military strategy and tactics. He was versed in Napoleonic doctrine. I would destroy him.

Next, fuckwit .....?

are you aware of what you just said? I doubt it.

carry on

I know EXACTLY what I just said. If the French hadn't bailed Washington's ass out we'd still be subjects of the Crown. You're not real good at this, are you?

You lost when you touched the keyboard. Go argue with truthmatters. She's your speed.

 

[Avatar4321]

Im a bit dumbfounded. So apparently the Founders set up a limited Federal government because they wanted it to be big and controling our every action. There really isnt anything to say to something that absurd.

 

[The T]

I see. best you can do is pick rightwing media personalities to go against Founding Fathers. Try to stack the deck much?

Washington couldn't debate with me. Not on politics NOR military strategy and tactics. He was versed in Napoleonic doctrine. I would destroy him.

Next, fuckwit .....?

are you aware of what you just said? I doubt it.

carry on

I know EXACTLY what I just said. If the French hadn't bailed Washington's ass out we'd still be subjects of the Crown. You're not real good at this, are you?

You lost when you touched the keyboard. Go argue with truthmatters. She's your speed.

As *IF* you needed help understanding YOUR own words?

What a presumptive statement. LOL!