Factcheck: "discouraged workers" hardly the only factor of th low labor participation

[Billy000]

The other two chief reasons are more people going on disability and more baby boomers retiring. Not only that, but the decline in participation began before Obama came into office.

Obama?s Numbers (January 2014 Update)


The reality is that over 3 million new jobs have been added to the economy (net job creation. 8 million jobs in total created since he came into office). 2.5 million of those jobs are directly related to the Recovery Act. Altogether 2.5x more jobs have been created in his 5 years than the previous 8.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

Oh, stop it.

America is in the suckiest "recovery" in the entirety of our history.

When will he Obiebot zombie fluffing ever end?

 

[Billy000]

Oh, stop it.

America is in the suckiest "recovery" in the entirety of our history.

When will he Obiebot zombie fluffing ever end?

The steaming mess started before Obama came to office. Several millions of jobs were lost. Of course the recovery is slow. Get a clue.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

ZOMG!

It's still Bush's fault.

Enough, already.

 

[Billy000]

ZOMG!

It's still Bush's fault.

Enough, already.

Um yeah history doesn't change.

 

[HelenaHandbag]

What hasn't changed is the shifting of the blame.

We're now six years into the "recovery" and it is still Bush's fault.

You are either blatantly dishonest or dumb as a stump. Or both.

 

[blackhawk]

Did anyone bother to read the link? First it states the statistics are showing what has happened since Obama took office not what happened before he took office meaning it's not about Bush and second while they do show some good things in the last five years the overall look of things since Obama took office is pretty sorry.

 

[freedombecki]

Oh, stop it.

America is in the suckiest "recovery" in the entirety of our history.

When will he Obiebot zombie fluffing ever end?

Who knows better than them than what's onion-like omuerta and cannot be proven?

 

[AceRothstein]

What hasn't changed is the shifting of the blame.

We're now six years into the "recovery" and it is still Bush's fault.

You are either blatantly dishonest or dumb as a stump. Or both.

The recovery started before the economy finished crashing? Speaking of blatant dishonesty...

 

[freedombecki]

ZOMG!

It's still Bush's fault.

Enough, already.

Um yeah history doesn't change.

Um history? Don't you really mean hysteria (rewritten history)?

You're cute with egg on your face, Billy.

 

[Billy000]

ZOMG!

It's still Bush's fault.

Enough, already.

Um yeah history doesn't change.

Um history? Don't you really mean hysteria (rewritten history)?

You're cute with egg on your face, Billy.

So you're actually suggesting the financial crisis didn't happen under Bush's watch?

 

[Billy000]

Did anyone bother to read the link? First it states the statistics are showing what has happened since Obama took office not what happened before he took office meaning it's not about Bush and second while they do show some good things in the last five years the overall look of things since Obama took office is pretty sorry.

I'm not the one who brought Bush up. Helena did.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Oh, stop it.

America is in the suckiest "recovery" in the entirety of our history.

When will he Obiebot zombie fluffing ever end?

The steaming mess started before Obama came to office. Several millions of jobs were lost. Of course the recovery is slow. Get a clue.

The only time an economic recovery has been this slow is when a far left Keynesian has been running the show, ie. Obama, FDR.

When economic conservatives have been in control recoveries from a recession have been rather quick, ie. Harding, Reagan.

 

[Billy000]

Oh, stop it.

America is in the suckiest "recovery" in the entirety of our history.

When will he Obiebot zombie fluffing ever end?

The steaming mess started before Obama came to office. Several millions of jobs were lost. Of course the recovery is slow. Get a clue.

The only time an economic recovery has been this slow is when a far left Keynesian has been running the show, ie. Obama, FDR.

When economic conservatives have been in control recoveries from a recession have been rather quick, ie. Harding, Reagan.

We lost 5 million jobs in the course of 6 months. This is unprecedented.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The steaming mess started before Obama came to office. Several millions of jobs were lost. Of course the recovery is slow. Get a clue.

The only time an economic recovery has been this slow is when a far left Keynesian has been running the show, ie. Obama, FDR.

When economic conservatives have been in control recoveries from a recession have been rather quick, ie. Harding, Reagan.

You're an idiot.

My God, if that's not the pot calling the kettle black.

We lost 5 million jobs in the course of 6 months. This is unprecedented.

No, dipshit, it isn't. The Depression of 1920 was brutal and put us in a deflationary spin and Harding lead a full recovery by the middle of 1921. In roughly 18 months things were back to normal because aside from some minor tax cuts, Harding pretty much did NOTHING and let the market self correct, the complete opposite of what Keynesian stooges like Hoover, FDR, and the current dill weed is doing with their intrusive central planning that never has and never will work, thus dragging out the economic stagnation that we are experiencing now and did during the Great Depression.

Now shut your fucking yap and try reading a book you ignorant dipshit

 

[Billy000]

The only time an economic recovery has been this slow is when a far left Keynesian has been running the show, ie. Obama, FDR.

When economic conservatives have been in control recoveries from a recession have been rather quick, ie. Harding, Reagan.

You're an idiot.

My God, if that's not the pot calling the kettle black.

We lost 5 million jobs in the course of 6 months. This is unprecedented.

No, dipshit, it isn't. The Depression of 1920 was brutal and put us in a deflationary spin and Harding lead a full recovery by the middle of 1921. In roughly 18 months things were back to normal because aside from some minor tax cuts, Harding pretty much did NOTHING and let the market self correct, the complete opposite of what Keynesian stooges like Hoover, FDR, and the current dill weed is doing with their intrusive central planning that never has and never will work, thus dragging out the economic stagnation that we are experiencing now and did during the Great Depression.

Now shut your fucking yap and try reading a book you ignorant dipshit

The Recovery Act was responsible for 2.5 million jobs. That massive job loss rate turned to job growth within months.

 

[Kosh]

The far left Obama propaganda drones are at it again.

 

[francoHFW]

FDR'S RECOVERY WAS SLOW BECAUSE AFTER 3 YEARS OF HOOVER'S MELTDOWN THERE WAS NOTHING LEFT TO RECOVER. THANK GOD THIS TIME A KEYNESIAN DEM GOT IN IMMEDIATELY TO AVERT A FULL DEPRESSION- Only cost 4-5 trillion.

And no we're not blaming Bush anymore, morons, we're blaming mindless Pub obstruction 4 1/2 of the last five years- just like the rest of the world does, hater dupes.. Each phony debt crisis costs 0.6 per cent at least in growth, and a normal jobs act would add 2 per cent.

 

[Zander]

Some folks just never tire of carrying water for this administration.

 

[Avorysuds]

You're an idiot.

My God, if that's not the pot calling the kettle black.

We lost 5 million jobs in the course of 6 months. This is unprecedented.

No, dipshit, it isn't. The Depression of 1920 was brutal and put us in a deflationary spin and Harding lead a full recovery by the middle of 1921. In roughly 18 months things were back to normal because aside from some minor tax cuts, Harding pretty much did NOTHING and let the market self correct, the complete opposite of what Keynesian stooges like Hoover, FDR, and the current dill weed is doing with their intrusive central planning that never has and never will work, thus dragging out the economic stagnation that we are experiencing now and did during the Great Depression.

Now shut your fucking yap and try reading a book you ignorant dipshit

The Recovery Act was responsible for 2.5 million jobs. That massive job loss rate turned to job growth within months.

And yet every year we lose more jobs than we gain... Trillions spent for less jobs, you might want to look into that. As DTMB said, and history clearly shows, Harding cut spending and gave tax cuts and got the country out of a depression. Obama has the FedR spending 1+ trillion a year + Obama's deficits of 1. whatever Trillion a year and we are at a net loss in jobs each year.

The only recovery under Obama has been for the rich, made possible by Obama showering trillions on them... Then ironically claiming to want to somehow tax the top 1% ( that Obama is a part of) more. Maybe sometime during this week yu can start another thread on the growing income inequality, and naturally forget Obama and his policies for the last 6 years that progressed that problem by leaps and bounds.