IGetItAlready
Rookie
- Jul 27, 2012
- 1,264
- 154
- 0
- Banned
- #1
We've been hearing this tired diversionary rhetoric for years now and have yet to have anyone in the administration go on record and in doing so, lock in a limit to which the "wealthy" can be raped, with what these terms refer to specifically.
I've heard a few USMB posters attempt to claim a "fair share" is equivalent to a 3-4% increase in federal tax rates but I've never heard Obama or anyone else in the administration be so specific. We've heard a lot of crap about the Clinton era tax levels but I have a hard time believing Obama's spending level could be sustained by Clinton's tax rates.
Any takers?
I've heard a few USMB posters attempt to claim a "fair share" is equivalent to a 3-4% increase in federal tax rates but I've never heard Obama or anyone else in the administration be so specific. We've heard a lot of crap about the Clinton era tax levels but I have a hard time believing Obama's spending level could be sustained by Clinton's tax rates.
Any takers?
