Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And how, exactly, were you going to show an increase when aside from a graph 800,000 years long, none of your data were plotted against TIME.
Actual measurements of course.
NOAA global outgoing longwave radiation [OLR] from annualized monthly means, via the KNMI Climate Explorer
This is not a measurement of the imbalance. This is simply proof that despite all your claims that warming had stopped, the Earth has been getting consistently warmer.
Look what carbon dioxide did to this ice!
wowLook what carbon dioxide did to this ice!
heat energy was transferred to the deep ocean...holy fuck!The observation that there is a radiative imbalance at the ToA was a response to the denier claim that the Earth had stopped warming.
Multiple studies have now concluded that the Earth never stopped warming. The heat energy has been transferred into the deep ocean and thus cooled the ocean's surface. And it seems it's started coming back out (two Cat 4 hurricanes so far in the Eastern Pacific, the first one occurring 2 weeks preseason).
So, the Earth's temperature is increasing. If that is not due to an imbalance at ToA, what COULD be its cause?
And what change, then, do you believe has CAUSED the increase in OLR? Cooling? Really? Do you believe, perhaps, that increased greenhouse gases have made the atmosphere more transparent to infrared? You believe lower temperatures lead to an increase in infrared radiation? Wow. You are consistent. You know, you are so consistently and fundamentally wrong on so many different science topics that I begin to believe its intentional. A monkey at a typewriter would have trouble being wrong as consistently as you. It makes me think you might simply be trolling here.
Are you ever going to produce data involving the radiative balance - the actual point of contention?
And yet not one link to datasets with source code that proves CO2 drives climate. Notice that zero scientific evidence exists to support the AGW religion.
And yet not one link to datasets with source code that proves CO2 drives climate. Notice that zero scientific evidence exists to support the AGW religion.
And yet not one link to datasets with source code that proves CO2 drives climate. Notice that zero scientific evidence exists to support the AGW religion.
You lying sack of shit. I posted both publicly available datasets and publicly available code for well-known GCMs.
And if you think there's no evidence in the references of the IPCC's five assessment reports, you're a really, really STUPID lying sack of shit.
And yet not one link to datasets with source code that proves CO2 drives climate. Notice that zero scientific evidence exists to support the AGW religion.
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!
why wont people believe me!!
I guess you haven't noticed, but that theory now has multiple studies whose findings support it. It has become the most popular theory as to the cause of the perceived hiatus.
That's an interesting selection of insult on your part. It really has no application: there's no logical connection between the idea that the ocean's warm surface waters are being subducted by a change in tropical wind patterns and an Islamic jihad (and you don't need to capitalize the term). It seems obvious that you and those to whom you believe you're speaking likely hold Islam in low regard and thought that would be a cutting remark. So, on top of your scientific ignorance, we can add religious bigotry. The two do often seem to go hand in hand.
ALL based on computer generated fiction. Not a SHRED of empirical data to support it.
