Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Close. In most states, one needs to graduate law school to practice law. But at least it used to be true that if you graduated law school in Wyoming, you were automatically not just a lawyer, but an admitted attorney at law.The Bar Exam is the test that allows you to practice Law. It is what you take to get your law license. You have to pass law school to take the test, but you can’t practice law without the Bar.
So graduating doesn’t make you a practicing lawyer.
And that's not all: her office made a judgmental call against President Trump by releasing information to the public before any hearing was held. That should disbar any attorney affiliated with the hack job they have planned for President Trump in Georgia, and it's evil what she did to make sure everybody knows how much she hates President Trump. She's gone mad.Fani was part of the prosecution that went after teachers accused of fixing test scores. She went after them (using Rico) after standerdized test scores (implemented during Bush and Obama) were used to evaluate teachers which affected teacher salaries. Some teachers cheated by falsifying test scores. Many teachers pleaded, one was acquitted. Half a dozen are appealing. The main 'kingpin' Dana Evans (former principal) was sentenced to 1 year in jail for supposedly failing to stop the cheating although she herself was not found culpable. Superior Court Judge Jerry Baxter reduced her sentence to probation and community service. Hardly a resounding victory for Fani. Now, here she is trying the same shit all over again. She's doing exactly what Marxists do, undermine the tenets of a society by using the legal system. Merrick Garland is letting her get away with it too. He's worse than her.
No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.It's against the Constitution for a prosecutor to announce she is going to "get Trump" when she was campaigning for her job, and then weaponizes that job to actually do him in. For her crime against the Constitution and President Trump, she may not be as smart as she thinks she is in getting away with that. She may face disbarment as well.
Close. In most states, one needs to graduate law school to practice law. But at least it used to be true that if you graduated law school in Wyoming, you were automatically not just a lawyer, but an admitted attorney at law.
Nowadays, in most of not all states, a JD makes you a lawyer. But passing the Bar is required to be an admitted practicing attorney at law.
And that's not all: her office made a judgmental call against President Trump by releasing information to the public before any hearing was held. That should disbar any attorney affiliated with the hack job they have planned for President Trump in Georgia, and it's evil what she did to make sure everybody knows how much she hates President Trump. She's gone mad.
^^Judge on Fani Willis appearance of conflict in Trump probe due to fundraiser: 'The optics are horrific...."
It's against the Constitution for a prosecutor to announce she is going to "get Trump"
He has probably been taking lessons from CClaytonJones.You need a new line.
Please cite anywhere in American law where a citizen is presumed guilty unless proven innocent. You Marxies always get it backwards. Any prosecutor that blabs about the guilt of the person they are prosecuting would be rightly called out by the legal system. Every good prosecutor knows they have to have EVIDENCE to 'get' their targeted perp and THEN go to trial and get a jury finding in your favor. Running around bragging they are going to 'get' someone is grounds for removing them from the case because any decent defense council would legally tear them apart. Unless. of course, the DOJ has it in for the Defendant.Please cite the specific amendment in which a prosecutor is forbidden from saying whom they ware going get. The specific part of the Constitution, the specific clause and/amendment.
You have no idea of what you are talking about and it shows.
My opinion is she's half an inch away from a full disbarment which she deserves for making public recriminations of charges against Trump that have not gone to trial yet. That is beneath the pale and yes, it is against the spirit of the Constitution of the United States of America for a prosecutor to tell her constituents someone is guilty PRIOR TO THE TRIAL/INQUIRY/ or whatever it is she plans to make herself a popular Democrat at the expense of an innocent man she has labeled as guilty before the trial. The woman is lower than snake snot in her practice of the law.No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.
Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.
She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.
I don’t dispute that he didn’t practice law if he don’t pass a bar.And Fanni Willis’s point is true. If Jim didn’t pass the Bar he never practiced law.
"lock her up" That is something I did not say. How does it feel to lie about a person who did not do what you broadly blamed them for something they did not say? You deserve to be ignored by intelligent citizens.Please cite the specific amendment in which a prosecutor is forbidden from saying whom they ware going get. The specific part of the Constitution, the specific clause and/amendment.
As often as you people shouted, "LOCK HER UP", with no real grounds for doing so, you must know how wrong you are. HRC broke no law, you people announcing you were going to her, how exactly is that different.
You have no idea of what you are talking about and it shows.
My opinion
This is why you’re recognized as being an asshole.So you do NOT have facts, all you have is an opinion. Under U.S. Law is legal to announce the target of an investigation. Your opinion means nothing when it comes to the actual facts.
Opinions are like asshole b, everybody has one and yours just plain stinks.
Quote from the article: " Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school"I will just remind folks that Mashmont is a "Christian" extremist who lies. Willis is not financed by Soros. She graduated from accredited institutions of higher education. Her comments were online with Jordan's numbskullery.
Mashmont lied saying the she implied Jordan had failed the bar. She pointed out, instead, that he never took it and gave him advice on how to do so.
Mashmont is a trump financed stooge.
President Trump is innocent in all the Democrat charges that he has endured for four full years of his presidency. He was found innocent in a House inquiry. He was found innocent in a Senate inquiry. He was found innocent of wrongdoing in the Mueller investigation. Nancy Pelosi and her gang tried to impeach Donald Trump, and it failed. When they realized he could win another election, Nancy impeached him again, and her egregious hatred and the second impeachment failed. Then Nancy decided to make sure that Trump got bad press by making sure he would not send hundreds ofNo, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.
Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.
She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.
This is nothing but a partisan hit, and Fani Willis even orchestrated the timing of his kangaroo court trial for the significant dates in the upcoming Election in which Trump is running. When they get done with her hearing for interfering with a Presidential election, Fani Willis will be at rock bottom. And that's what I think.No, it is not against the Constitution to announce she is going after suspect criminals.
Trump tried to weaponize the Presidency and now is attempt to do so with his campaign. So far he is failing.
She will convict Trump. She will become a Senator. Trump will be remanded into federal custody.
I read that, it was a pretty scathing takedown.On Thursday, the prosecutor who indicted Donald Trump and 18 alleged co-conspirators on racketeering charges (RICO) slapped down Jordan's attempts to "interfere" with her investigation, and curtly explained to him that he has no idea what he is talking about when it comes to the law – even accusing him of spreading "misinformation."
With regard to her filing under the RICO statute, Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school, writing that he can still continue his education by purchasing legal expert John Floyd's RICO book "for the non-bar member price of $249."
'This is how it's done': Legal experts applaud Fani Willis for sending Jim Jordan 'to the showers'
Social media legal experts piled on Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis fired off a multi-page letter to the House Judiciary chairman, essentially telling him to butt out of her investigation into tampering in the 2020 presidential election.On Thursday, the...www.rawstory.com
I read that, it was a pretty scathing takedown.
Ohio's representative, Juris Doctor James Daniel Jordan, has a doctorate of the Law that tells his mistaken protagonist doesn't know what she's talking about, because he knows all that stuff, and he knows she is gaslighting in the most manipulative way. The Constitution does encourage employees of the lower courts must also be of good character. Her egregious political shenannigans of going after President Trump with political planning and her screwing a person she failed to recuse herself from in a court case, is pretty telling she hasn't the character nor the behavior and is unfit to serve the great state of Georgia. I hope their dismissal of her targeted hatred against President Trump removes her for going against the Constitution with her egregious and underhanded double-dealings.And Fanni Willis’s point is true. If Jim didn’t pass the Bar he never practiced law.
She said he had not taken the bar, not that he had not passed it. You, a false Christian like Ordinary Guy, are lying.Quote from the article: " Willis made a point of reminding the blustery Ohio Republican that he never passed the bar after attending law school"
Falsely implies Jordan failed the bar exam. She lied. As did you.
