Farmer Prevented from Selling His Crop Because He Supports Traditional Marriage

That's not what I said at all.....I thought lying was a no no for christians based on the 10 Suggestions.

I guess not.

Then you shouldn't lie when someone calls you out on it, hypocrite.
Where did I lie? You are the one who say I was "OK if businesses deny service to divorced people"...when I said no such thing.

If you're going to lie about lying, why do you even come on here?
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
Why are you such a slimy little coward? Answer, because you don't have the balls to say what you mean. You have to use codes like NL because you're a typical racist that tries to talk tough but when it comes time to walk the talk you slither like a snake.
Punks like Con 65 are sooooo easy to spot. Loser dunces with bright spotlights on them. Dumber than rocks and cruder than Texas oil.
 
If you're going to lie about lying, why do you even come on here?
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
There's that NL fall-back that Con-servative65 uses. A dead giveaway, isn't it?

It can't be a fallback when it applies.
When what applies, RL?

NL, boy. If you're going to be one, why are you mad if someone calls you that?
 
Then you shouldn't lie when someone calls you out on it, hypocrite.
Where did I lie? You are the one who say I was "OK if businesses deny service to divorced people"...when I said no such thing.

If you're going to lie about lying, why do you even come on here?
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
Why are you such a slimy little coward? Answer, because you don't have the balls to say what you mean. You have to use codes like NL because you're a typical racist that tries to talk tough but when it comes time to talk the talk you slither like a snake.
Punks like Con 65 are sooooo easy to spot. Loser dunces with bright spotlights on them. Dumber than rocks and cruder than Texas oil.

I've said what I meant. Apparently the filter on the forum doesn't have the balls as it puts "*********" when I post it. Perhaps you should talk to it NL.
 
It doesn't.....but you DO know about Business licenses, right? Are they unConstitutional?

Then the argument that the Constitution protects such a thing are false.
Answer the question, RL. Are business licenses unConstitutional?

You're dealing with people who believe that child pornography is protected by the 1st amendment because the 1st amendment doesn't specify any exceptions to freedom of the press.

Says the one that believes all sorts of things are within the power of the federal government because he wants them to be.

So you don't deny that that is an accurate description of your position?

You're reaching, NL.
 
Where did I lie? You are the one who say I was "OK if businesses deny service to divorced people"...when I said no such thing.

If you're going to lie about lying, why do you even come on here?
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
Why are you such a slimy little coward? Answer, because you don't have the balls to say what you mean. You have to use codes like NL because you're a typical racist that tries to talk tough but when it comes time to walk the talk you slither like a snake.
Punks like Con 65 are sooooo easy to spot. Loser dunces with bright spotlights on them. Dumber than rocks and cruder than Texas oil.

I've said what I meant. Apparently the filter on the forum doesn't have the balls as it puts "*********" when I post it. Perhaps you should talk to it NL.
OK snowflake, whatever you say.
 
Just face the fact that most conservatives would like to roll back anti-discrimination laws to the point where the whites-only diner could operate unfettered.

Based on my experience a few days ago involving two black females and their children they let run wild while people were trying to eat, I'm good with that.

I also believe that if a black owned restaurant wanted to do such a thing with whites, they should be able to do so. However, there's only so much money that can be made from serving fried chicken, watermelon, and collard greens.
 
If you're going to lie about lying, why do you even come on here?
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
Why are you such a slimy little coward? Answer, because you don't have the balls to say what you mean. You have to use codes like NL because you're a typical racist that tries to talk tough but when it comes time to walk the talk you slither like a snake.
Punks like Con 65 are sooooo easy to spot. Loser dunces with bright spotlights on them. Dumber than rocks and cruder than Texas oil.

I've said what I meant. Apparently the filter on the forum doesn't have the balls as it puts "*********" when I post it. Perhaps you should talk to it NL.
OK snowflake, whatever you say.

It's not what I say, it's what the forum filter does. You sure are stupid. I'm guessing you're not a NL, you're just a N.
 
The Regressives say "tough shit". You should know better than to express your opinion. You will not be tolerated. You will be punished.

After all, this is America.

Of course you know this isn't about 'expressing your opinion', he clearly broke a city ordinance by discriminating against same sex couples. Take issue with that if you want to, but at least have a basic understanding of whats going on.
So if he refused to rent it out to a Nazi group, you would make him do it?

Nazi groups aren't covered by the city ordinance, so they'd have to go to Maralago.
So you would say the same with black lives matter to be denied?

If race weren't involved then yes.
It's a group that is just like the Nazi's.
 
Nice to see those who have no problem with sanctuary cities become so concerned about laws 'n stuff.
.

Is this your way of realizing it's not a free speech issue? I guess 'non-partisans' are full of shit too.
Correct, it's a PC issue.

Right to the personal insults, huh? Good.
.

Personal insults? No, I'm just pointing out the dirty underbelly of your non-partisanship.

If you think people should be discriminated against based on sexual orientation, religion or even race then just embrace it. However, the guy isn't following the city ordnance and the city is taking action. Now there is a lawsuit and they will fight it out in the courts, why do you have a problem with any of that?
The law is the law, indeed.

And, as I said, Americans need to know that they'd damn well better watch what they say, and that they'll be punished if they're not careful.

See? We agree.
.

Great, we agree the guy broke the city ordinance by not treating gay couples the same as hetero couples. Awesome.

Why would a city ordinance apply to a business not located in that city that does not do business in that city?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Just face the fact that most conservatives would like to roll back anti-discrimination laws to the point where the whites-only diner could operate unfettered.

Based on my experience a few days ago involving two black females and their children they let run wild while people were trying to eat, I'm good with that.

I also believe that if a black owned restaurant wanted to do such a thing with whites, they should be able to do so. However, there's only so much money that can be made from serving fried chicken, watermelon, and collard greens.

Oh, no, not fried chicken, watermelon and collard greens! Wow, snowflake, you sure are missing out on some good eats.
 
Of course you know this isn't about 'expressing your opinion', he clearly broke a city ordinance by discriminating against same sex couples. Take issue with that if you want to, but at least have a basic understanding of whats going on.
So if he refused to rent it out to a Nazi group, you would make him do it?

Nazi groups aren't covered by the city ordinance, so they'd have to go to Maralago.
So you would say the same with black lives matter to be denied?

If race weren't involved then yes.
It's a group that is just like the Nazi's.

I disagree, but that's irrelevant. I answered your question.
 
Is this your way of realizing it's not a free speech issue? I guess 'non-partisans' are full of shit too.
Correct, it's a PC issue.

Right to the personal insults, huh? Good.
.

Personal insults? No, I'm just pointing out the dirty underbelly of your non-partisanship.

If you think people should be discriminated against based on sexual orientation, religion or even race then just embrace it. However, the guy isn't following the city ordnance and the city is taking action. Now there is a lawsuit and they will fight it out in the courts, why do you have a problem with any of that?
The law is the law, indeed.

And, as I said, Americans need to know that they'd damn well better watch what they say, and that they'll be punished if they're not careful.

See? We agree.
.

Great, we agree the guy broke the city ordinance by not treating gay couples the same as hetero couples. Awesome.

Why would a city ordinance apply to a business not located in that city that does not do business in that city?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They do business in the city, their farm however is located outside of the city (I guess) and I think the farmer may have a valid point in court, I'm not sure how that works. But, that's more or less a legal technicality. If the city ordinance applies to the entirety of the farmers business and not just what takes place within the city then the farmer probably won't be seen much at the farmers market.
 
Federal law says it and the Constitution protects the supremacy of federal law in the Supremacy Clause.

So you can't show me the specific location? Got it. Much like when I've asked for the location of where the Constitution says healthcare, food stamps, etc. you couldn't provide it. The 10th Amendment says things like that belong at the State level yet you big government idiots still want them at the federal level.

You don't understand that the Constitution need not itemize 100 million specifics in order to cover them.

You are just one more retarded conservative who imagines our Constitution as something as fanciful as imagining that the moon is made of cheese.

You don't seem to understand that because you want the federal government to do it that makes it within their power.

I read what the Constitution says. You read for what you want it to say.

It's obviously within their power if it's the law of the land.

Are you claiming that every law passed is Constitutional?
Until it's been declared unConstitutional....it is. Feel free to challenge any law's Constitutionality, RL.
 
So if he refused to rent it out to a Nazi group, you would make him do it?

Nazi groups aren't covered by the city ordinance, so they'd have to go to Maralago.
So you would say the same with black lives matter to be denied?

If race weren't involved then yes.
It's a group that is just like the Nazi's.

I disagree, but that's irrelevant. I answered your question.
Really they are worse. They loot, use violence, block roads, goes against anyone that doesn't totally agree with them. Even light buildings on fire, but your party supports them.
 
Are you and Rustic the same person or did you both go to the same school to become stupid and dishonest?

Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
There's that NL fall-back that Con-servative65 uses. A dead giveaway, isn't it?

It can't be a fallback when it applies.
When what applies, RL?

NL, boy. If you're going to be one, why are you mad if someone calls you that?
If someone calls me what, RL?
 
Just face the fact that most conservatives would like to roll back anti-discrimination laws to the point where the whites-only diner could operate unfettered.

Based on my experience a few days ago involving two black females and their children they let run wild while people were trying to eat, I'm good with that.

I also believe that if a black owned restaurant wanted to do such a thing with whites, they should be able to do so. However, there's only so much money that can be made from serving fried chicken, watermelon, and collard greens.

Oh, no, not fried chicken, watermelon and collard greens! Wow, snowflake, you sure are missing out on some good eats.

I like all three.
 
Nazi groups aren't covered by the city ordinance, so they'd have to go to Maralago.
So you would say the same with black lives matter to be denied?

If race weren't involved then yes.
It's a group that is just like the Nazi's.

I disagree, but that's irrelevant. I answered your question.
Really they are worse. They loot, use violence, block roads, goes against anyone that doesn't totally agree with them. Even light buildings on fire, but your party supports them.

BLM themselves does not condone looting. Blocking roads? Oh noez, not that.

BLM does not promote racial superiority.

However, this is all off topic to the thread, I answered your question.
 
Are all you NLs the same person or are there just that many of you?
There's that NL fall-back that Con-servative65 uses. A dead giveaway, isn't it?

It can't be a fallback when it applies.
When what applies, RL?

NL, boy. If you're going to be one, why are you mad if someone calls you that?
If someone calls me what, RL?

How many times do I have to tell you before you admit, NL?
 

Forum List

Back
Top