Favorite Clips from the Impeachment Inquiry Hearing, today 9/28/23

[Seymour Flops]

That witness said there is not enough evidence to impeach Biden, you claim there is.

Should I trust you or the star witness for your beloved party?

Star GOP Witness Immediately Pours Cold Water on Biden Impeachment

Reuters/Jonathan ErnstRepublicans’ long-shot attempt to impeach President Joe Biden got off to a rocky start Thursday, with their star witness, legal expert Jonathan Turley, outright saying he doesn’t see any evidence to support impeachment.“I do not believe that the current evidence would...

www.yahoo.com

“I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment,”

Sure, the CURRENT evidence.

There are many leads that the DOJ did not follow up on. The impeachment investigators will have to follow up on those.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sure, the CURRENT evidence.

According to you, and I quote....No we have the evidenene and will impeach Biden for his crimes


Are you now walking that back?

 

[Winston]

The evidence is a part of the inquiry transcript. Day 1 of the inquiry has concluded. There is more evidence to be presented.

Did you expect the inquiry to last a single day?

Look you stupid bitch. Normally, an impeachment hearing begins with laying out the evidence for impeachment. That hasn't happened here.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Sure, the CURRENT evidence.

There are many leads that the DOJ did not follow up on. The impeachment investigators will have to follow up on those.

When are you going to put up?

Hunter has been scrutinized for much longer than Donald Trump.

 

[Seymour Flops]

According to you, and I quote....No we have the evidenene and will impeach Biden for his crimes


Are you now walking that back?

Yes we do and yes we will. It was Turley who said that the CURRENT evidence does not support impeachment. I disagree with Turley on that, but i respect his opinion.

I hope the Congressional investigators are thorough and nail the case down so that the impeachmentbleads to removal.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes we do and yes we will. It was Turley who said that the CURRENT evidence does not support impeachment. I disagree with Turley on that, but i respect his opinion.

So again, I have to choose between some hack on the web or the expert witness called by your own beloved party.

Such choices.

 

[Seymour Flops]

When are you going to put up?

Hunter has been scrutinized for much longer than Donald Trump.

He has been "srutinized" by people desperate for a way to appear to go after him without tainting The Big Guy.

What is your explanation for them letting the statute of limitations expire for Hunters tax evasion in 2014? Hunter doesn't even have to pay those back taxes now.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So again, I have to choose between some hack on the web or the expert witness called by your own beloved party.

Such choices.

You can believe whatever you want. We will see who is right when Joe is either impeached or not impeached.

 

[The5thHorseman]

He has been "srutinized" by people desperate for a way to appear to go after him without tainting The Big Guy.

What is your explanation for them letting the statute of limitations expire for Hunters tax evasion in 2014? Hunter doesn't even have to pay those back taxes now.

He has been "srutinized" by people desperate for a way to appear to go after him without tainting The Big Guy

Absolutely no one gives a shit about your interpretations.

What is your explanation for them

Not my job.

 

[bodecea]

It seems to really upset you that MTG exposed the fact that Hunter Biden used his cut of the bribe money to traffic women across state lines.

Why is that?

Happy that MTG parades porno, eh? I bet you are.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Happy that MTG parades porno, eh? I bet you are.

A person in a bathing suit is porno?

 

[Hollie]

And you're still trying.

Of course.

You gave up.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Of course.

You gave up.

No...you failed to post any evidence.

 

[Hollie]

No...you failed to post any evidence.

Not true. You failed.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Not true. You failed.

Then link to where you posted the evidence.

 

[Hollie]

Then link to where you posted the evidence.

Already did.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Katie Porter's questioning did not appear as a stand alone clip. She asked Prof Turley "do you think this impeachment inquiry has merit or is legitimate?"

His answer: "I do. I think that the passed - the House has passed the threshold for an inquiry separate from the question of articles of impeachment."

Hopefully that will disabuse all of the notion that the "star witness" said that there won't ever be enough evidence for impeachment.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Absolutely no one gives a shit about your interpretations.




Not my job.

You asked me to "put up." I did and now you don't want to play any more.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Key takeaway from this hearing: Hunter did NOT sell the "illusion of access." He sold actual access as the GOP members cited numerous examples of.

Of course Devon Archer never said that it was illusion of access. That phrase was invented by Dan Goldman (D) in questioning Archer. Archer disagreedvwithbthst characterization and then Goldman lied about it.

 

[Richard-H]

This is MTG in action:



I love that the Democrats are complaining about MTG presenting "pornography," which are actually Hunter Biden with one of his human trafficking victims. "Not appropriate for the children who may be watching."

Haw!

The party that loves the idea of pictures of gay men being fellated by underage boys being in books in the school library. Just as long as those nosy parents don't have any say over it, that is.

All that this proves is that MTG is a total BULLSHIT artist.

None of what she presented shows that Hunter Biden was involved in any Mann Act violation or other sex related crimes.

Nothing on the letter she presented had Hunter's name on it. It could have been a letter about anyone.

No wonder the DOJ won't answer her inquiries - they know that she's a lying bag of shit!