FBI is wrapping up e-mail investigation with no evidence Clinton willfully violated the law

[Fair&Balanced]

No , it doesn't . You are absolutely 100% wrong. The laws are clear.

We'll see. Just remember.....I told you so.

There is no we'll see Skylar.

Sure there is. Most legal experts who have been asked about this case say there won't be any charges.

You insist they are all wrong and you're right. The DOJ will decide who is right.....you or legal experts. Just remember....I told you so.

Actually, most legal experts do NOT disagree with me, they in fact agree with me, IF the FBI determines that Hillary was involved with any classified information being on a non secure server , they are likely to recommend an indictment.

The legal experts asked by AP say otherwise:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton responded, "It's not going to happen."

Though Republicans characterized her response as hubris, several legal experts interviewed by The Associated Press agreed with the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The relatively few laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies, leakers and those who illegally retain such information, such as at home. Though the view is not unanimous, several lawyers who specialize in this area said it's a stretch to apply existing statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides — not a national enemy.

Hillary Clinton said "It's not going to happen" when asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state
​

You insist you know better.

Smiling......we'll see.

OMG you just cited Hillary Clinton as an expert about her own case? I'm sure if asked Richard Nixon would have said "I'll never be impeached" as well.

LOL That was pathetic.

 

[BlueGin]

In terms of disclosing top secret information, it matters. Walking out 8 binders of top secret information to show your mistress isn't the same thing as not having a server secure enough. Its understood at the justice department that the intent of the laws was to punish people who gave out our secrets.

Which there is zero evidence Clinton ever did.

The complete lack of criminal intent is extremely relevant. And will likely shape the outcome of the investigation.

No , it doesn't . You are absolutely 100% wrong. The laws are clear.

We'll see. Just remember.....I told you so.

There is no we'll see Skylar.

Sure there is. Most legal experts who have been asked about this case say there won't be any charges.

You insist they are all wrong and you're right. The DOJ will decide who is right.....you or legal experts. Just remember....I told you so.

DOJ works for Obama, do you really think they are going to go against him and indict Hillary?

They added the word "willfully" for a reason.

Willfully is a subjective term.

 

[Skylar]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

 

[dannyboys]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

No, they cite officials in the investigation:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Though anonymous sources should always be taken with a grain of salt. As they may have agendas or may not know what they are talking about.

So they named the sources, they are anonymous? You don't know what "anonymous" means, do you? Did you think that was their name?

You're clearly confused. I never said they named the sources. I said they cited officials in the investigation.

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

If you think "officials" working for the FBI are going to be telling anyone anything about the ongoing investigation you are seriously stupid!
What are you? Like eight? That's the intellectual level your posts reveal.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

It does matter.

Let me tell you son, I've been out there when someone who had classified information that could cost you personally if they mishandled it and the idea that people like you think it doesn't matter just turns my stomach.

 

[kaz]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

No, they cite officials in the investigation:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Though anonymous sources should always be taken with a grain of salt. As they may have agendas or may not know what they are talking about.

So they named the sources, they are anonymous? You don't know what "anonymous" means, do you? Did you think that was their name?

You're clearly confused. I never said they named the sources. I said they cited officials in the investigation.

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Officials don't comment on an ongoing investigations other than to say it "I have no comment as this investigation is still ongoing".

I call B.S. on this.

They didn't even claim the sources were in the FBI, they only said they were anonymous. To the liberal media, that could have been their left foot making the claim

 

[kaz]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

No, they cite officials in the investigation:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Though anonymous sources should always be taken with a grain of salt. As they may have agendas or may not know what they are talking about.

So they named the sources, they are anonymous? You don't know what "anonymous" means, do you? Did you think that was their name?

You're clearly confused. I never said they named the sources. I said they cited officials in the investigation.

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

If you think "officials" working for the FBI are going to be telling anyone anything about the ongoing investigation you are seriously stupid!
What are you? Like eight? That's the intellectual level your posts reveal.

The link didn't say the "anonymous" sources were in the FBI or associated with the investigation, it said zero about them

 

[Skylar]

We'll see. Just remember.....I told you so.

There is no we'll see Skylar.

Sure there is. Most legal experts who have been asked about this case say there won't be any charges.

You insist they are all wrong and you're right. The DOJ will decide who is right.....you or legal experts. Just remember....I told you so.

Actually, most legal experts do NOT disagree with me, they in fact agree with me, IF the FBI determines that Hillary was involved with any classified information being on a non secure server , they are likely to recommend an indictment.

The legal experts asked by AP say otherwise:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton responded, "It's not going to happen."

Though Republicans characterized her response as hubris, several legal experts interviewed by The Associated Press agreed with the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The relatively few laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies, leakers and those who illegally retain such information, such as at home. Though the view is not unanimous, several lawyers who specialize in this area said it's a stretch to apply existing statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides — not a national enemy.

Hillary Clinton said "It's not going to happen" when asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state
​

Hillary Clinton said "It's not going to happen" when asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state
[/INDENT]

You insist you know better.

Smiling......we'll see.

OMG you just cited Hillary Clinton as an expert about her own case?

I cited several legal experts that AP interviewed that agreed with Hillary. Here, I'll bold it for you so you don't get confused again:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton responded, "It's not going to happen."

Though Republicans characterized her response as hubris, several legal experts interviewed by The Associated Press agreed with the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.

The relatively few laws that govern the handling of classified materials were generally written to cover spies, leakers and those who illegally retain such information, such as at home. Though the view is not unanimous, several lawyers who specialize in this area said it's a stretch to apply existing statutes to a former cabinet secretary whose communication of sensitive materials was with aides — not a national enemy.

Hillary Clinton said "It's not going to happen" when asked earlier this month whether she'd be indicted over her use of a private email server as secretary of state
​

You insist you know better. We'll see. Just remember......both the legal experts and I told you what was going to happen. You simply didn't listen.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

We'll see. Just remember.....I told you so.

There is no we'll see Skylar.

Sure there is. Most legal experts who have been asked about this case say there won't be any charges.

You insist they are all wrong and you're right. The DOJ will decide who is right.....you or legal experts. Just remember....I told you so.

DOJ works for Obama, do you really think they are going to go against him and indict Hillary?

Well, there's two schools of thought on this... one of which is that the Clinton's and the Obama's literally hate each other. The other is that the FBI head is a very uncorrupt man. If the FBI recommends indictment, and t he DOJ doesn't, a shitstorm may ensue.

The head of the FBI is by all accounts a law and order straight arrow. If he recommends indictment, it's because he found wrong doing, if not then he didn't ..

Totally agree... as it should be.

 

[MaryL]

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Some of Hillary Clinton’s closest aides, including her longtime adviser Huma Abedin, have provided interviews to federal investigators, as the FBI probe into the security of her private email server nears completion, U.S. officials briefed on the investigation tell CNN. The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven’t found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

One the e-mail investigation is over, is will be over for Donald. She will CRUSH HIM IN NOVEMBER! And you Donald supporter will deny you ever supported him. FUNNY!

But perhaps she negligently violated the law. Possibly?

 

[kaz]

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

No, they cite officials in the investigation:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Though anonymous sources should always be taken with a grain of salt. As they may have agendas or may not know what they are talking about.

So they named the sources, they are anonymous? You don't know what "anonymous" means, do you? Did you think that was their name?

You're clearly confused. I never said they named the sources. I said they cited officials in the investigation.

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Officials don't comment on an ongoing investigations other than to say it "is still ongoing".

Except when they do.

The link doesn't claim the sources were in the FBI or even involved in the investigation

 

[Skylar]

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

No, they cite officials in the investigation:

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Though anonymous sources should always be taken with a grain of salt. As they may have agendas or may not know what they are talking about.

So they named the sources, they are anonymous? You don't know what "anonymous" means, do you? Did you think that was their name?

You're clearly confused. I never said they named the sources. I said they cited officials in the investigation.

Try again. This time reading for comprehension.

Officials don't comment on an ongoing investigations other than to say it "I have no comment as this investigation is still ongoing".

I call B.S. on this.

They didn't even claim the sources were in the FBI, they only said they were anonymous. To the liberal media, that could have been their left foot making the claim

You said they only quoted Hillary aides. I corrected you.

But hey, keep polishing your rhetorical turd if you want. Neither the article nor the investigation will change in the slightest.

 

[kaz]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

 

[Skylar]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

CNN cited US officials briefed on the investigation. You know it. I know it. Now so does everyone else.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Skylar, IF the FBI recommends indictment, would you then say Hillary should not be eligible to be President?

 

[kaz]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

CNN cited US officials briefed on the investigation. You know it. I know it. Now so does everyone else.

Actually, they didn't say "US officials"

 

[Fair&Balanced]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

CNN cited US officials briefed on the investigation. You know it. I know it. Now so does everyone else.

The FBI does not brief people outside the justice department about ongoing investigations PERIOD. And no one from the Justice Department is going to say no laws were broken here at this juncture of the investigation.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

CNN cited US officials briefed on the investigation. You know it. I know it. Now so does everyone else.

The FBI does not brief people outside the justice department about ongoing investigations PERIOD. And no one from the Justice Department is going to say no laws were broken here at this juncture of the investigation.

Exactly.

 

[Care4all]

ANY Sec of State who in fact transmitted classified information via nonsecure communications should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, I don't give a flying fuck what political party they were in, nor any other excuse.

US Officials Report No Evidence Hillary Clinton Broke The Law, Will Right-Wing Media Listen?

Conservative Media Conspiracy Theories Doused By The Facts
US Officials Report No Evidence Hillary Clinton Broke The Law, Will Right-Wing Media Listen?

Blog ››› May 5, 2016 10:15 PM EDT ››› TYLER CHERRY

Once again, that article says that there is no evidence that she WILLFULLY broke the law.

That is NOT how the laws on mishandling classified information work. There is no requirement to prove she purposely mishandled anything. Even if one classified email ACCIDENTALLY appeared on her server, she's guilty of a crime.

Benghazi ........................................

Nice attempt to deflect, but you'll in fact not find any posts from me about such.

Now, answer my question. Do you understand that it is irrelevant whether she willfully broke the law or not? That's a simple yes or no question.

PROVE IT....

every single lawyer that has defended those charged with top secret violations that have spoken up on this case have STATED that it has to be knowingly and willfully committed or severe gross negligence, in order for the gvt to prosecute.

 

[Care4all]

I said the video didn't add anything to that there were no sources and you came back with yes they did, they cited anonymous sources. I don't know what you even thing you're arguing right now

You said the article only cited Clinton aides.

So the article only cited Clinton aides saying there was no evidence and the video added zero to that

As my quote demonstrates, you were obviously wrong. The article cited officials in the investigation.

The interviews, we’re told, are focused on whether classified information was mishandled, and the security of the server. So far officials tell us, no, there is no evidence of criminal wrongdoing at this point in the investigation, but, again, the investigation is not over.

CNN Reports FBI Has Found ‘No Criminal Wrongdoing’ in Hillary Clinton Email ‘Investigation’

Ignore as you will. It really doesn't matter.

Whatever, you're into word parsing at a level you lost my interest

CNN cited US officials briefed on the investigation. You know it. I know it. Now so does everyone else.

The FBI does not brief people outside the justice department about ongoing investigations PERIOD. And no one from the Justice Department is going to say no laws were broken here at this juncture of the investigation.

sooooooooo, every single one of those right wing media outlets like FOX News were lying to ALL of you for nearly a year on this Hillary email thing???? ALL of their supposed sources were filling you and their watchers with bull crud?

hmmmmm.........