crossbody
Diamond Member
- Jan 30, 2024
- 1,844
- 1,693
- 1,893
Federal appeals court confirms COVID jabs donāt āprevent the spreadā of diseaseā¦ which means they arenāt vaccines at all
06/18/2024The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had previously defended LAUSDās jab mandate based on the 1905 Supreme Court decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts to allow states to mandate smallpox vaccinations. The problem, according to Ninth Circuit Judge R. Nelson, is that smallpox injections, in that case, were deemed to help stop the spread of smallpox, which is not the case for COVID jabs.
In this case, plaintiffs āhave plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively āprevent the spreadā of COVID-19,ā Judge Nelson wrote. āAt this stage, we must accept Plaintiffās allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true. And, because of this, Jacobson does not apply.ā
In other words, since there is zero compelling evidence to show that mRNA (modRNA) COVID shots prevent the spread of a virus called COVID, there is no legal basis by which to mandate them on anyone.
![www.lifesitenews.com](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Pfizer.jpeg)
Federal appeals court affirms COVID shots do not 'prevent the spread' of virus - LifeSite
Judge R. Nelson affirmed that the COVID injections do not āprevent the spread of COVID-19ā and ruled in favor of a group of plaintiffs suing the Los Angeles school district for mandating the experimental jabs.
![www.lifesitenews.com](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/themes/lifesite/assets/ico/favicon.png)