Federal courts REPEALS another pro-life law

[ShootSpeeders]

Repealing laws is a legislative function but UNELECTED judges do it all the time!!!

Texas abortion limits unconstitutional, federal judge says - POLITICO.com


10/29/13 10:31 AM EDT
A federal district court has ruled that one abortion restriction passed by the Texas state Legislature over the summer is unconstitutional and has partially blocked another.

District Judge Lee Yeakel has blocked the state from enforcing a requirement that abortion-providing doctors obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals — a restriction that would have ended abortion services at one-third of the health centers currently providing them. He also blocked restrictions on the use of medication abortion. Both restrictions would have gone into effect on Tuesday.

Planned Parenthood and more than a dozen other women’s health providers that filed the suit successfully demonstrated that the admitting privileges provision puts an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion in Texas, as the provision creates a “substantial obstacle” to accessing such service, Yeakel wrote.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the United States". Writing and repealing laws are functions of the legislature not the courts.!!!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Repealing laws is a legislative function but UNELECTED judges do it all the time!!!

Texas abortion limits unconstitutional, federal judge says - POLITICO.com


10/29/13 10:31 AM EDT
A federal district court has ruled that one abortion restriction passed by the Texas state Legislature over the summer is unconstitutional and has partially blocked another.

District Judge Lee Yeakel has blocked the state from enforcing a requirement that abortion-providing doctors obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals — a restriction that would have ended abortion services at one-third of the health centers currently providing them. He also blocked restrictions on the use of medication abortion. Both restrictions would have gone into effect on Tuesday.

Planned Parenthood and more than a dozen other women’s health providers that filed the suit successfully demonstrated that the admitting privileges provision puts an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion in Texas, as the provision creates a “substantial obstacle” to accessing such service, Yeakel wrote.

You truly are ignorant.

A Federal court invalidating a law because it’s un-Constitution is not ‘repealing’ the law; the law remains in effect, it simply can’t be enforced.

And in this case the fault lies with the lawmakers who enacted legislation they clearly knew to be un-Constitutional. When elected officials fail in their responsibility to obey the Constitution and act in bad faith by passing legislation offensive to the Founding Document, it falls upon the courts to protect citizens and their civil liberties from the bad acts of lawmakers who are indeed hostile to those civil liberties.

Texas lawmakers have only themselves to blame, not the court.

 

[bodecea]

Repealing laws is a legislative function but UNELECTED judges do it all the time!!!

Texas abortion limits unconstitutional, federal judge says - POLITICO.com


10/29/13 10:31 AM EDT
A federal district court has ruled that one abortion restriction passed by the Texas state Legislature over the summer is unconstitutional and has partially blocked another.

District Judge Lee Yeakel has blocked the state from enforcing a requirement that abortion-providing doctors obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals — a restriction that would have ended abortion services at one-third of the health centers currently providing them. He also blocked restrictions on the use of medication abortion. Both restrictions would have gone into effect on Tuesday.

Planned Parenthood and more than a dozen other women’s health providers that filed the suit successfully demonstrated that the admitting privileges provision puts an “undue burden” on a woman seeking an abortion in Texas, as the provision creates a “substantial obstacle” to accessing such service, Yeakel wrote.

Welcome to America. It's called Judicial Review.

 

[bodecea]

The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the United States". Writing and repealing laws are functions of the legislature not the courts.!!!

Striking down an unConstitutional law is the job of the federal court system. Courts do not create laws, they determine EXISTING laws constitutionality. Welcome to America.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Striking down an unConstitutional law is the job of the federal court system. Courts do not create laws, they determine EXISTING laws constitutionality. Welcome to America.

Where does the constitution give courts this authority to act like a super-legislature and repeal laws passed by elected representatives of the people.? Where?

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

A Federal court invalidating a law because it’s un-Constitution is not ‘repealing’ the law; the law remains in effect, it simply can’t be enforced.

.

HAHAHA. That is the funniest thing i ever heard.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[

Welcome to America. It's called Judicial Review.

Hey stupid. It's called judicial tyranny and it's not only dumb, it's unconstitutional. THINK

 

[Asclepias]

You are dumber than a pile of dead leaves Shootspeeder.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SS, look up legislative powers (Art I) and judicial powers (Art III), then come back and apologize.

 

[R.C. Christian]

And the baby killers pounce....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Striking down an unConstitutional law is the job of the federal court system. Courts do not create laws, they determine EXISTING laws constitutionality. Welcome to America.

Where does the constitution give courts this authority to act like a super-legislature and repeal laws passed by elected representatives of the people.? Where?

The doctrine of judicial review and the interpretive authority of the courts predate the Constitution, as judicial review was always part of the Anglo-American judicial tradition as practiced in Colonial America.

The Constitution authorizes the doctrine of judicial review in Article III, Sections 1 and 2, and in Article IV.

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), Chief Justice Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, acknowledged the doctrine of judicial review that existed before the Foundation Era, acknowledged the Constitution’s authorization of the doctrine, and acknowledged the fact that “a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts . . . are bound by that instrument.”

The states are subject to the Federal Constitution and its case law, as are the judges and justices of the Federal courts, and the officers of the many states – including those of Texas.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you, C_Clayton_Jones.

 

[YWN666]

[

A Federal court invalidating a law because it’s un-Constitution is not ‘repealing’ the law; the law remains in effect, it simply can’t be enforced.

.

HAHAHA. That is the funniest thing i ever heard.

You obviously haven't seen the results of your IQ test.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

You are dumber than a pile of dead leaves Shootspeeder.

The board notes all you have is namecalling. Thanks for admitting i'm right.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

[
The states are subject to the Federal Constitution and its case law, as are the judges and justices of the Federal courts, and the officers of the many states – including those of Texas.

So how did the courts invent the "constitutional right to abortion". 170 years of case law said abortion is a state issue and yet in 1973, the courts ignored all that case law and made it a federal issue. Explain that.

 

[Moonglow]

Denial kills.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Forceps on fetii brains kill better not that any liberal mother fucker on this site cares about that.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Denial kills.

Yes indeed. Liberals keep denying the clear wording of the constitution that all legislative powers are vested in congress. Only they can repeal a law.

 

[KokomoJojo]

The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the United States". Writing and repealing laws are functions of the legislature not the courts.!!!

Striking down an unConstitutional law is the job of the federal court system. Courts do not create laws, they determine EXISTING laws constitutionality. Welcome to America.

well ya got 51 constitutions

they interpret if statutes are constitutional and you would be shocked at how creative they can get in building their house of cards.