Federal Gun Law Struck Down

Fetuses aren't people

No matter how loudly, how often, or how hatefully you repeat that lie, it will remain a hateful, murderous lie. Exactly the same as when your relatives in The Old Country said similarly about Jews. Same hate, same motive. Except that your relatives in The Old Country only managed to murder about a quarter as many people as those who agree with you in this country have murdered.
 
Kids are going to be gay no matter how many times you should "God" at them.

Children are not “gay” or “trans” or any other kind of fucked-up sexual perverts, unless some sick pedophile is grooming them that way.

It takes a pretty badly fucked-up piece of shit to even think of children in terms of such perversions.
 
Party members.....and the important point, you dumb fuck.......the national socialists took guns away from the people they planned on murdering......so a good sign to look out for in the future is a government taking guns away from their people.

Two points because you're dense.

1) The Nazis allowed ALL good Aryans - 99% of the population to get guns if they wanted to. Of course, a lot of Germans still had guns left over from WWI, when the German Army more or less disintegrated and no one was collecting those weapons.

The Weimar Republic had tried to ban guns and failed miserably, which is they the Nazis, Communists and other bad actors pulled off a number of attempted putsches and had pitched street battles.

2) Despite the proliferation of guns, not a single German gun owner went out and tried to save a Jewish neighbor from the SS.

Just like if we ever took a wrong turn in this country, I'm certainly not rushing out to save you. I'm going to worry about my own ass.
 
That's pretty much the defining position of a terrorist—to demand that they get their way politically, or else they will murder innocent people.

Children are not “gay” or “trans” or any other kind of fucked-up sexual perverts, unless some sick pedophile is grooming them that way.

Um, nope. If that was the case, then how do you explain gay Mormons?


Eventually, your Prophet is going to have a talk with 'God" and find out that you are okay with the gay.

It takes a pretty badly fucked-up piece of shit to even think of children in terms of such perversions.
That's only because you think of gender identity and sexual orientation in terms of sex. You know, most gay people are NOT having sex most of the time. They are just living their lives.
 
No matter how loudly, how often, or how hatefully you repeat that lie, it will remain a hateful, murderous lie. Exactly the same as when your relatives in The Old Country said similarly about Jews. Same hate, same motive. Except that your relatives in The Old Country only managed to murder about a quarter as many people as those who agree with you in this country have murdered.

Except Fetuses were NEVER Recognized as people. The Nazis had to CHANGE the law to make Jews less than human, and they didn't even really do that in the open. (Most Germans had no idea what was going on in the camps until after the war.)

Not in the Bible (See Exodus 21:22-25), despite the effort of some religions to say otherwise. In fact, as much as i rag on Mormonism, the LDS position on abortion is nowhere near as radical as yours.
Not in English Common Law
Not in medical science
Not in American Law, which doesn't recognize a person's existence until a certificate of live birth is issued. I didn't exist before May 7, 1962, in the eyes of the law. Fetuses are not counted in the Census, and they are not counted for tax purposes.

That's pretty much the defining position of a terrorist—to demand that they get their way politically, or else they will murder innocent people.
So, pregnant women deciding not to carry pregnancies to term unless they get help are terrorists? Really, Bob?

Here's the problem your anti-choice clowns will always have. a $300.00 abortion is cheaper than a $10,000 live birth and 18 years of child support.
 
Two points because you're dense.

1) The Nazis allowed ALL good Aryans - 99% of the population to get guns if they wanted to. Of course, a lot of Germans still had guns left over from WWI, when the German Army more or less disintegrated and no one was collecting those weapons.

The Weimar Republic had tried to ban guns and failed miserably, which is they the Nazis, Communists and other bad actors pulled off a number of attempted putsches and had pitched street battles.

2) Despite the proliferation of guns, not a single German gun owner went out and tried to save a Jewish neighbor from the SS.

Just like if we ever took a wrong turn in this country, I'm certainly not rushing out to save you. I'm going to worry about my own ass.

Again, they took guns away from the people they planned on murdering...

They didnt have guns to stop the socialists when they beat up their political opponents long before they started sending them to death camps......

Guns keep them from using violence to take control of a country ....that is why the democrats only use blm and antifa in the cities they control....they cant let blm and antifa burn, loot and murder in the suburbs because the suburbs have guns....just ask Kyle Rittenhouse....
 

Yeah...the socialists used violence against unarmed opponents to take power .....with the local police doing nothing to stop them.....just like when the democrat party mayors ordered the police to do nothing when their brown shirts, blm and antifa were burning, looting and killing in black neighborhoods.....
 
Yeah...the socialists used violence against unarmed opponents to take power .....with the local police doing nothing to stop them.....just like when the democrat party mayors ordered the police to do nothing when their brown shirts, blm and antifa were burning, looting and killing in black neighborhoods.....

you really are stretching analogies.

Okay... So what did gun nuts with more weapons than the National Guard do in that situation. NOthing. You all cowered in your houses and hoped the rioters didn't get there.
 
you really are stretching analogies.

Okay... So what did gun nuts with more weapons than the National Guard do in that situation. NOthing. You all cowered in your houses and hoped the rioters didn't get there.

The democrat controlled cities have extreme gun control. The business owners who had guns didnt have their businesses burned and looted......Kyle Rittenhouse used his rifle to kill one, maim another and scared off the third violent asshole who tried to murder him....and the rest of the crowd of brown shirts didnt attack him.
 
No, the average German was allowed to own guns.

The Jews were not.
And this funny thing happened. Not one German ran out of his house with his gun to save his Jewish Neighbor from the Nazis. Not. Fucking. Once.

So if your argument is that you need to have your gun to protect us from the government, that's bullshit.

The government has tanks, the government has planes.

And if the government ever comes for you, you'll end up like that Crazy Mormon they just bagged in Utah.


Liar. Only Nazi Party members were allowed save in very rare circumstances.
 
The democrat controlled cities have extreme gun control.

Guy, nobody has "extreme gun control". We have NO gun control, that's the fucking problem. Any lunatic with Orange hair or freaky tats can walk into a gun store and buy an AR-15 and a 100 round magazine and no one thinks twice about it. We have to lock down our schools like fortresses and arm our police like soldiers, and we have a murder rate worse than any anarchic third world country.

1692445384220.jpeg
1692445404998.jpeg




The business owners who had guns didnt have their businesses burned and looted......
Sure they did... they were looted when they weren't there.
Kyle Rittenhouse used his rifle to kill one, maim another and scared off the third violent asshole who tried to murder him....

Um, no Rittenhouse murdered one homeless man in the street, then murdered an innocent bystander who tried to stop him, them maimed a "good guy with a gun", showing how utterly silly the "Good guy with a gun" premise is.

And a racist senile judge let him get away with it by suppressing what a shitball this kid was.
 
Guy, nobody has "extreme gun control". We have NO gun control, that's the fucking problem. Any lunatic with Orange hair or freaky tats can walk into a gun store and buy an AR-15 and a 100 round magazine and no one thinks twice about it. We have to lock down our schools like fortresses and arm our police like soldiers, and we have a murder rate worse than any anarchic third world country.

View attachment 816581View attachment 816582




Sure they did... they were looted when they weren't there.


Um, no Rittenhouse murdered one homeless man in the street, then murdered an innocent bystander who tried to stop him, them maimed a "good guy with a gun", showing how utterly silly the "Good guy with a gun" premise is.

And a racist senile judge let him get away with it by suppressing what a shitball this kid was.

You are such a vile human……you lie in the cause of hate and oppression……,nothing you just posted is true remotely accurate.…….
 
Liar. Only Nazi Party members were allowed save in very rare circumstances.


University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. "The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.



False dichotomy

Not at all. The very reality is that we watch school massacre after school massacre, and we do NOTHING to make it harder for people like Adam Lanza, Nicholas Cruz, Salvador Ramos, Audrey Hale, to get guns... because we love our guns more than we love our children.
 

University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. "The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.





Not at all. The very reality is that we watch school massacre after school massacre, and we do NOTHING to make it harder for people like Adam Lanza, Nicholas Cruz, Salvador Ramos, Audrey Hale, to get guns... because we love our guns more than we love our children.


His "study" is pure BS, He ignored well known history. One of my friends grandfather was a very rare person with a permit for a pistol because he was a circus owner that had dangerous animals. He was the ONLY non Party member with a permit in the entire region.

In Wurzburg you weren't even allowed to keep the bayonet you captured in the war, they all had to be turned in under the Nazis, all of which is documented in the book The Nazi Seizure of Power. That book goes through all of the archives of that town, and is an excellent microcosm of nazi rule across Germany prior to the war.

Well known history which he ignored.
 

University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. "The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.





Not at all. The very reality is that we watch school massacre after school massacre, and we do NOTHING to make it harder for people like Adam Lanza, Nicholas Cruz, Salvador Ramos, Audrey Hale, to get guns... because we love our guns more than we love our children.


Again....you lying sack of crap......

The national socialists took guns away from the people they intended to murder........and if you weren't a party member, it was harder to get guns......

I know you have to lie about both guns and the socialists...since socialists always end up murdering people and filling mass graves......but you aren't going to lie about them here.......

We have all the gun laws we need........your god, "government," failed in almost every case of shooters since most of them were known to police, the school administrations and the government......and simply keeping doors in schools locked saves lives without disarming millions of Americans the democrats want to control, and one day murder.
 
His "study" is pure BS, He ignored well known history. One of my friends grandfather was a very rare person with a permit for a pistol because he was a circus owner that had dangerous animals. He was the ONLY non Party member with a permit in the entire region.
Anecdotes aren't proof.


In Wurzburg you weren't even allowed to keep the bayonet you captured in the war, they all had to be turned in under the Nazis, all of which is documented in the book The Nazi Seizure of Power. That book goes through all of the archives of that town, and is an excellent microcosm of nazi rule across Germany prior to the war.
Anecdotes aren't proof.
 

Forum List

Back
Top