basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,037
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
150 years from now people will look back on our society and be appalled.
You get that the law didn't ban dilation-and-evacuation abortions, right? What it, in fact, did was force doctors to go to much more draconian measures to preform an, otherwise, simple procedure - The Texas law, the New York Times notes, “would require doctors to stop the fetus’s heart before performing a dilation-and-evacuation abortion, except in a medical emergency. D&E abortions, as they are known, involve dilating the woman’s cervix and removing the fetus in pieces." a simple, d&E is the safest method of performing an abortion in the second trimester. The law was unconstitutional, and would have forced a woman to undergo much more dangerous, invasive medical procedures before being able to continue with the abortion. That was sick, and evil. Putting a stop to the abuse of women just because they were making a personal choice with which you disagree was humane, and the only right ruling.