FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Christophera]

The Constitution with its rights and freedoms are worth whatever expense. But an agent working for treason would not recognize that.

Nor would an agent recognize deprivations of Constitutional rights by family law courts,

FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html
SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html



Or the deprival of vital information that failure to appear on subpoena represents

When the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness on subpoena it was a violation of Consitutional rights and


TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1985
Prev | Next
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
How Current is This?
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

1876?

What the hell are you yammering and bleating about NOW?

1876?

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

 

[Fizz]

How much time and money do the infiltrators of the US government spend on trying to subvert citizens efforts to protect the Constitution?

none

 

[Christophera]

How much time and money do the infiltrators of the US government spend on trying to subvert citizens efforts to protect the Constitution?

none

That is the answer I would expect from the infiltrators. Cointelpro is a known fact.

 

[DiveCon]

How much time and money do the infiltrators of the US government spend on trying to subvert citizens efforts to protect the Constitution?

none

That is the answer I would expect from the infiltrators. Cointelpro is a known fact.

you are a fucking moron

take your meds

 

[slackjawed]

The Constitution with its rights and freedoms are worth whatever expense. But an agent working for treason would not recognize that.

Nor would an agent recognize deprivations of Constitutional rights by family law courts,

FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html
SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html



Or the deprival of vital information that failure to appear on subpoena represents

When the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness on subpoena it was a violation of Consitutional rights and


TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1985
Prev | Next
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
How Current is This?
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

1876?

What the hell are you yammering and bleating about NOW?

1876?

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

what is this shit? How is this useful information?
hereis something much more interesting, and just as useful;

THIS IS A TRANSCRIPT OF THE GUNFIGHT BETWEEN IKE CLANTON AND PABLO ROMERO. THE SALOON BELONGED TO CHARLIE KINNEAR, BUT WAS RUN BY HIS BROTHER-IN-LAW SENON CASTILLO.

IN THE JUSTICE'S COURT OF SPRINGERVILLE PRECINCT
COUNTY OF APACHE, TERRITORY OF ARIZONA

THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff
VS
J. ISAAC CLANTON
Defendant

COMPLAINT - CRIMINAL



Personally appeared before me this twenty third day of May, 1886, Senon Castillo of Springerville Precinct, in the County of Apache, who, first being duly sworn, complains and says: That one J. Isaac Clanton, on the nineteenth day of May, 1886, at said County of Apache, did shoot, with intent to kill, one Pablo Romero, all of which is contrary to the form of the Statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the people of the Territory of Arizona. Said complaintant therefore prays that a warrant may be issued for the arrest of the said J. Isaac Clanton, and that he may be dealt with according to law.

(Signed) Senon Castillo

Subscribed and sworn to before me,
this 23rd day of May, 1886.

In pursuance of the foregoing complaint, warrant issued on the 23rd day of May 1886, and placed in the hands of P.H. Snow, Special Constable, who executed said warrant by arresting the said Defendant, J. Isaac Clanton and bringing him into Court on said 23rd. day of May, 1886. The said Defendant was informed of the charge against him and plead not guilty. The Defendant was then asked if he was ready for a hearing. The Defendant said he was not ready for a hearing and asked for an adjournment of one day to enable him to procure his witnesses and Counsel. The request of Defendant, granted, and he was ordered to give bail in the sum of one thousand dollars for his appearance for examination. On the 24th day of May, 1886, the Defendant gave the required bail bond and was released. May 24th, 1886, 2 o'clock A.M. The Defendant appeared in Court on the day and hour above mentioned, and announced himself ready for examination. The Court then proceeded to make a thorough examination of the witnesses; Senon Castillo and Francisco Padilla who saw the shooting affray between the said Defendant, J. Isaac Clanton and Pablo Romero. Also, J. V. Brighton, to whose house the Defendant went immediately after the shooting, was examined, and the statement of the Defendant was also taken, and as all the witnesses who were examined, corroborated the statement of the said Defendant, and there being no evidence to warrant holding the Defendant, he was discharged.
COSTS

For filing complaint
.25
For issuing warrant
1.00
For proceedings
3.00
For bail bond
1.00
For taking depositions 10 folios
2.00
$7.25

CONSTABLE COSTS
For serving warrant
2.00
For summoning four witnesses
2.00
For milage serving warrant and subpoenas
.80

$4.80
For interpreter
$2.50



John T. Hogue
Justice of the Peace of said Precinct






THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
Plaintiff
VS
J. ISAAC CLANTON
Defendant

Springerville, A.T.

May 24, 1886

CRIMINAL ACTION



In the Justice Court,
Springerville Precinct,
Apache County, Arizona.

Francisco Padilla, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

Q. What is your name?

A. Francisco Padilla.

Q. How old are you?

A. 43 years.

Q. Where do you reside?

A. Springerville, Apache County.

Q. What is your occupation?

A. Farmer.

Q. Did you witness the fight between Ike Clanton and Pablo Romero on the evening of May 19, in Senon Castillo's Saloon? If so, state all you know about it?

A. When I came in the Saloon, Ike Clanton and Pablo Romero were playing Casino. They played one game while I was there, and I noticed that Pablo had made nine points and Ike had made two. In the second game there arose a dispute between them. Pablo told Ike that he had made eleven points. They disputed for a while, then I (the witness) Told Pablo that it was certain the way Ike said, that Pablo had made nine points, and that Ike had made two. And then Pablo told me (witness) that Ike was a liar. Then Ike told Pablo it is all right. "Boy, it is all right." Then they stood in silence a little while. Then Ike got up and asked Senon Castillo for a match. Then Pablo got up a little after Ike did, and then, Ike walked behind the bar and took a match. When Ike took the match and lit it, then Pablo took the gun which was sitting at the east end of the bar. Then, when Ike saw Pablo take the gun, he took his six-shooter which was lying behind the bar. Then Pablo raised the gun and I don't think Ike gave Pablo time to shoot because Ike took hold of the gun and the shooting began.

Q. Did you see Pablo discharge his gun, the ball passing through the front door?

A. No sir. I did not see.

Q. It is not possible or probable, that he might have discharged his gun in this excitement, and state you did not see it?

A. It is possible but I did not see it.

his
Signed, Francisco X Padilla.
mark
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 24th day
of May, 1886. John T. Hogue

Senon Castillo, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

Q. What is your name?

A. Senon Castillo.

Q. What is your age?

A. 27 years.

Q. Where do you reside?

A. Springerville, Apache County.

Q. What is your occupation?

A. Selling whiskey.

Q. Were you present when the shooting affair occured between the defendant, Issac Clanton and Pablo Romero?

A. Yes sir.

Q. Where did it occur?

A. In my Saloon.

Q. You will state how it occured and all about it to the best of your recollection?

A. They were playing Casino, and a little while after they were playing I heard a dispute between them about some points. That defendant told Pablo Romero that he (Pablo) had made nine points, and that he (the defendant) had made two. That Pablo said that he had made 11 points, and that Ike, the defendant, did not make any And then, angry words, such as a lie passed between them. Both got up as if they were going to go out of the Saloon. Then Ike, the defendant, asked me for a match. I told Ike there were matches behind the counter, to take some. When Ike turned his face toward where Pablo Romero was, he, Pablo lifted a gun and pointed it towards Ike. Ike then caught hold of the gun and threw it aside, both men having hold of the gun. Then the shooting commenced. (When he heard the shooting he only saw Ike's gun.) I am not certain whether Pablo Romero shot or not.

Q. Why are you not certain that Pablo Romro shot?

A. They were both mixed up with the guns and there was so much smoke that I could not distinguish whether Pablo Romero shot or not.

Q. Which way was Pablo Romero facing when the fight commenced?

A. When Ike, the defendant, asked me for a match he walked behind the bar and Pablo walked in the same direction. When Ike got the match, he turned, facing Pablo and Pablo lifted the gun, a Windchester 44 caliber and pointed it towards Ike. Then, Ike's sixshooter was laying near the matches. He, Ike, seized the gun and at the same time, took hold of his six-shooter which was laying behind the bar near the matches. Then the shooting commenced.

Q. Was there not a shot fired through, or near, the door facing west of the Saloon?

A. Yes, through or near the middle of the door.

Q. Is it not possible that the shot through the door could have been fired by Ike Clanton facing as he was, east and in opposite direction from the door?

A. I can not tell. They were turning in every direction.

Q. Is it possible that the shot through the door was fired by Pablo Romero, as Ike was facing that way?

A. It is possible but I am not certain.

Q. Then you cannot swear positively whether Pablo Romero shot or not?

A. I cannot swear positively, as they were so tangled up in the fight. I could not tell.

Q. You are positive, are you not, that Pablo Romero picked up the gun and pointed it towards the defendant in the first place?

A. Yes sir.

Signed, Senon Castillo.

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 24th day of May, 1886, John
T. Hogue, Justice of the Peace.

J.V. Brighton, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

Q. What is your name.

A. J.V. Brighton.

Q. Where do you reside?

A. Springerville, Apache County, Arizona.

Q. How old are you?

A. 39 years.

Q. Did Ike Clanton come over to your house on the evening of the 19th day of May, 1886, and give you a gun? If so, state whether or not there was an exploded cartridge shell in the chamber of the gun, and all about it?

A. Yes. He came into my house and he gave me a 44 Windchester gun and I threw the lever down and an empty shell flew out, which had the appearance of just having been exploded. I examined the shell and the gun too, and saw that it just had been fired. After I had examined the gun I noticed that Issac Clanton's shirt sleeve on his left arm was powder burnt and I asked him if he was hurt, and he told me he was not on the arm.

Q. State, who you delivered the gun to from which you took a previously exploded shell, and whether anything was said about that gun having been used in a fight?

A. I delivered the gun to Senon Castillo. He asked me for it and I supposed it was his. Ike told Senon, at the time I delivered the gun, that it had been used by Pablo Romero in an affair with Ike Clanton.

Q. Who were present when this was talked about, that is, that this gun had been fired at Issac Clanton?

A. Wm. Woods, my wife, A.J. Cooper, Issac Clanton and Senon Castillo.

Q. How far do you reside from the Saloon?

A. About one hundred and fifty yards.

Q. Did you hear shooting at the Saloon on the evening of the 19th of May, 1886? If so, how many shots were fired?

A. Yes, I heard shooting. I heard two shots together at first, and. I am not certain but there were two or three shots fired afterwards, making four or five shots in all.

Q. Did Isaac Clanton tell you at the time he gave you that 44 Windchester you have been testifying about, that he took it from anyone? If so, whom?

A. Yes. he said that he took it from a Mexican who came damned near getting him.

Q. Did you examine the shot through the front door facing west of Senon Castillo's Saloon? If so, what was the result?

A. Right through one of the double doors was a clean cut bullet hole which had been shot from the inside of the building, which had the appearence of having been done with a 44 caliber rifle.

Signed, J.V. Brighton.

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 24th day of May, 1886.
John T. Hogue, Justice of the Peace,
Apache County, Territory of Arizona.

STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT

Q. What is your name? and age?

A. J. Isaac Clanton, 38 years.

Q. Where were you born?

A. Missouri.

Q. Where do you reside, and how long have you resided there?

A. I reside in Socorro County, New Mexico. Have resided there about eight months.

Q. What is your business or profession?

A. Ranchman.

Q. Give any explanation you may think proper of the circumstances appearing in the testimony against you, and state any facts which you think will tend to your exculpatory?

A. On the evening of the 19th of May, 1886, I was in the Saloon of Senon Castillo when Pablo Romero came in and bantered me for a game of Casino. I refused to play with him at first, but after refusing three or four times I commenced playing with him. After we had played three games a dispute arose in the points game about the number of points. Francisco Padilla who was standing near, told. Pablo Romero that I was right. Then Pablo told Francisco Padilla that I had Lied. I told him that I had not, that the points were as I had said they were. I saw that Pablo was excited. He was trembling. I then got up and asked Senon Castillo for a match to light my cigar with. I went behind the bar to get a match. When I got a match and lit it first, then Pablo Romero grabbed his gun. As he raised the gun, I saw him cock it. My pistol was laying on the end of the bar close to the gun. As he pointed the gun toward me I threw it off with my left hand and grabbed my pistol with my right hand and we both fired. I held on to the gun and fired several shots. After the third shot I saw he was not weakening and I hit him over the head with my six-shooter, when it was discharged accidently after he fell.

I picked up his gun and took it over to Mr. Brighton's. As my left shirt sleeve was powder burned I know it was from the shot from his gun and the bullet went through the door. I was facing the east and Pablo Romero was facing the west when the shooting commenced. It was not possible that the shot through the front door of Senon Castillo's Saloon facing west was from my pistol as I was not facing west at any time during the shooting.

Signed, Isaac Clanton.

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 24th day of May, 1886, John T. Hogue,
Justice of the Peace, Apache County, Territory of Arizona.
In the Justice Court, Springerville, Precinct, Apache County, Arizona.

TERRITORY OF ARIZONA
VS
J. ISAAC CLANTON

After hearing the testimony and the statement of the Defendant, and there being no sufficiant cause to believe the witness, J. Isaac Clanton, guilty of the aforesaid written mentioned , I order him to be discharged.

Given under my hand this 24th day of May, A.D. 1886. John T. Hogue, Justice of the Peace, Springerville, Apache County, Territory of Arizona.

Back to top

From Jack Becker's Collection
read more round valley history at;
Transcript of gunfight betweem Ike Clanton & Pablo Romero

 

[Fizz]

chris's claim is that he was hypnotized into not paying child support, or some crazy shit like that. his proof is that records from 1876 are missing.

its just all totally insane. he subpoenaed the records from 1876. he fails to recognize the law that states evidence must be relevant to the case and his subpoena doesnt matter because his evidence was ruled irrelevant.

he was sentenced to 179 days in jail (or something close to that) for not paying about $30,000 in child support for around 15 years. the child support was only like $120 a month

he's stated all kinds of crazy things in lawsuits. things like somebody blinked at him aggressively and tilted his head trying to hypnotize him. things like the truck in from of him made the fuse in his car blow out. he then got dragged out of the business of the truck by police when he demanded to be paid $65 for the fuse.

he's jsut completely insane... (which i find quite entertaining)

 

[slackjawed]

chris's claim is that he was hypnotized into not paying child support, or some crazy shit like that. his proof is that records from 1876 are missing.

its just all totally insane. he subpoenaed the records from 1876. he fails to recognize the law that states evidence must be relevant to the case and his subpoena doesnt matter because his evidence was ruled irrelevant.

he was sentenced to 179 days in jail (or something close to that) for not paying about $30,000 in child support for around 15 years. the child support was only like $120 a month

he's stated all kinds of crazy things in lawsuits. things like somebody blinked at him aggressively and tilted his head trying to hypnotize him. things like the truck in from of him made the fuse in his car blow out. he then got dragged out of the business of the truck by police when he demanded to be paid $65 for the fuse.

he's jsut completely insane... (which i find quite entertaining)

I find him hilarious most of the time, but then there times I wish I could leave my bootprints in the back of his head.

 

[Liability]

The Constitution with its rights and freedoms are worth whatever expense. But an agent working for treason would not recognize that.

Nor would an agent recognize deprivations of Constitutional rights by family law courts,

FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html
SUPREME COURT TRICKERY
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1826942-post3076.html



Or the deprival of vital information that failure to appear on subpoena represents

When the county counsel interfered with the appearance of the witness on subpoena it was a violation of Consitutional rights and


TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1985
Prev | Next
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
How Current is This?
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.

1876?

What the hell are you yammering and bleating about NOW?

1876?

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

I don't give a rat's ass if they existed once upon a time or not.

The question, you paranoid loon, is how on Earth they could possibly have ANY fucking legal relevancy to any modern day case?

Pablo and Ike played a card game and a dispute arose and then a shooting and some poor dope witnessed it -- in 1886. How on Earth does that have any connection to YOUR dopey case?

 

[Christophera]

1876?

What the hell are you yammering and bleating about NOW?

1876?

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

I don't give a rat's ass if they existed once upon a time or not.

The question, you paranoid loon, is how on Earth they could possibly have ANY fucking legal relevancy to any modern day case?

They were insanity actions. They represent a situation of many extreme behaviors and that is always useful to the study of psychology.

Of course the perps won't care about that or violations of law, so you won't either.

 

[DiveCon]

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

I don't give a rat's ass if they existed once upon a time or not.

The question, you paranoid loon, is how on Earth they could possibly have ANY fucking legal relevancy to any modern day case?

They were insanity actions. They represent a situation of many extreme behaviors and that is always useful to the study of psychology.

Of course the perps won't care about that or violations of law, so you won't either.

ROFLMAO
you are such a fucking LOON

 

[Christophera]

ROFLMAO
you are such a fucking LOON

The perpetrators of mass murder working to destroy the US Constitution would appreciate that you said that.

 

[Fizz]

ROFLMAO
you are such a fucking LOON

The perpetrators of mass murder working to destroy the US Constitution would appreciate that you said that.

how do you know exactly what "the perpetrators" want? you must be one of them.

the mass murder was committed 19 muslim hijacker, you fucking deadbeat idiot.

your court case wasnt about psychology. IT WAS ABOUT YOU NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT.

 

[DiveCon]

ROFLMAO
you are such a fucking LOON

The perpetrators of mass murder working to destroy the US Constitution would appreciate that you said that.

how do you know exactly what "the perpetrators" want? you must be one of them.

the mass murder was committed 19 muslim hijacker, you fucking deadbeat idiot.

your court case wasnt about psychology. IT WAS ABOUT YOU NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT.

actually, i bet his case was about psychology, HIS

 

[Liability]

The 1876 arrest and booking records were seen in the year before they were subpoenaed.

that is how I knew they existed.

agents will not recognize deprivations of Constitutional right. Particularly when they are done in the evasion of law. Especially in this case because there were over 1,000 court case files mising from the civil index of the district court that was in Santa Barbara at the time.

I don't give a rat's ass if they existed once upon a time or not.

The question, you paranoid loon, is how on Earth they could possibly have ANY fucking legal relevancy to any modern day case?

They were insanity actions. They represent a situation of many extreme behaviors and that is always useful to the study of psychology.

Of course the perps won't care about that or violations of law, so you won't either.

So you are contemplating mounting an insanity defense?

If you want to look up old Court documents, you fucking moron, you don't do it by issuing process to the sheriff.

I do not believe it is possible for you to be any dumber, any more dense, any more imbecilic, any more paranoid or any more irrational.

But, God bless your ugly pinhead, you DO try.

Scumbag cretins like you who violate the law (and any semblance of decency) when they won't even support their own children have NO basis to address whether other people adhere to the law, you depraved rat fucker. I am not particularly religious, but still, I have enough sense to see that YOU need to get down on your scumbag knees and pray to God Almighty for forgiveness; and then you are obligated to try to make right all the fucked up things you have done and all the obligations you have not managed to fulfill.

You could START by vowing to spend no more time and no more money on your lunatic paranoid conspiracy bullshit and to instead spend your time trying hard to earn extra money so that you can begin to make up to your own flesh and blood the things you have declined to do for them, you prick. And you could ALSO, in the process, cease providing aid and comfort to the Islamocamelhumpers who attacked us on 9/11/2001, you treasonous scumbag.

 

[Christophera]

I don't give a rat's ass if they existed once upon a time or not.

The question, you paranoid loon, is how on Earth they could possibly have ANY fucking legal relevancy to any modern day case?

They were insanity actions. They represent a situation of many extreme behaviors and that is always useful to the study of psychology.

Of course the perps won't care about that or violations of law, so you won't either.

So you are contemplating mounting an insanity defense?

If you want to look up old Court documents, you fucking moron, you don't do it by issuing process to the sheriff.

You are pretty ignorant so you probably don't know that for every arrest for a crime of insanity there must be an insanity action. A court hearing. If I allege there are missing insanity actions, all I need to do is count the arrests for crimes of insanity and compare the insanity actions to see if they are equal. the sheriff has the arrest and booking records.

This has been required since the Magna Carta.

You are also very predictable.

 

[DiveCon]

They were insanity actions. They represent a situation of many extreme behaviors and that is always useful to the study of psychology.

Of course the perps won't care about that or violations of law, so you won't either.

So you are contemplating mounting an insanity defense?

If you want to look up old Court documents, you fucking moron, you don't do it by issuing process to the sheriff.

You are pretty ignorant so you probably don't know that for every arrest for a crime of insanity there must be an insanity action. A court hearing. If I allege there are missing insanity actions, all I need to do is count the arrests for crimes of insanity and compare the insanity actions to see if they are equal. the sheriff has the arrest and booking records.

This has been required since the Magna Carta.

You are also very predictable.

hey dipshit, he didn't say you should be arrested for insanity(that might be a good idea since you are quite INSANE) he said you were setting up to USE an insanity defense
something quite different

 

[Christophera]

hey dipshit, he didn't say you should be arrested for insanity(that might be a good idea since you are quite INSANE) he said you were setting up to USE an insanity defense
something quite different

Unfortunately you will not have that possibility. He can plead stupidity.

 

[Fizz]

You are pretty ignorant so you probably don't know that for every arrest for a crime of insanity there must be an insanity action. A court hearing. If I allege there are missing insanity actions, all I need to do is count the arrests for crimes of insanity and compare the insanity actions to see if they are equal. the sheriff has the arrest and booking records.

This has been required since the Magna Carta.

You are also very predictable.

the insanity cases from 1876 are completely irrelevant to the court case for YOU NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT you fucking moron.

the law states that you can only admit RELEVANT evidence.

your were convicted and rightfully so.

 

[Christophera]

You are pretty ignorant so you probably don't know that for every arrest for a crime of insanity there must be an insanity action. A court hearing. If I allege there are missing insanity actions, all I need to do is count the arrests for crimes of insanity and compare the insanity actions to see if they are equal. the sheriff has the arrest and booking records.

This has been required since the Magna Carta.

You are also very predictable.

the insanity cases from 1876 are completely irrelevant to the court case for YOU NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT you fucking moron.

Sorry your brain is so faulty. The failure to appear on subpoena was in 1998, years before the county retaliated against me by using the state family law courts to deprive me of rights. That is why the issue of estopped is so prominant as a defense. But the court deprived me of all right.

 

[Fizz]

You are pretty ignorant so you probably don't know that for every arrest for a crime of insanity there must be an insanity action. A court hearing. If I allege there are missing insanity actions, all I need to do is count the arrests for crimes of insanity and compare the insanity actions to see if they are equal. the sheriff has the arrest and booking records.

This has been required since the Magna Carta.

You are also very predictable.

the insanity cases from 1876 are completely irrelevant to the court case for YOU NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT you fucking moron.

Sorry your brain is so faulty. The failure to appear on subpoena was in 1998, years before the county retaliated against me by using the state family law courts to deprive me of rights. That is why the issue of estopped is so prominant as a defense. But the court deprived me of all right.

you didnt pay your child support. the state didnt "retaliate" you fucking paranoid moron. it enforced the law. PAY YOUR CHILD SUPPORT AND THE STATE WON'T FILE CHARGES OF NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT you fucking idiotic moron.