Sorry, but you do. It completely destroys your theory. Thet fact that you balk at it every time and cannot provide one counter point to my proof is a telltale sign that you are a beaten man.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core
- Thread starter Christophera
- Start date
Sorry, but you do. It completely destroys your theory. Thet fact that you balk at it every time and cannot provide one counter point to my proof is a telltale sign that you are a beaten man.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,462
That is what the perpetrators of mass murder would want you to say. However, you cannot credibly do that while ignoring the violations of law that enable your argument.
If guliani had not taken the WTC documents with 6,000 photo files and the plans, you would have no argument. America would know that there was a concrete core just like the engineer of record identified to Newsweek days after 9-11.
Because you ignore violations of law that would give you the correct elevator dimensions you have no credibility agent.
On top of that, this appears to be concrete.
and the core is always empty in 9-11 images.
If guliani had not taken the WTC documents with 6,000 photo files and the plans, you would have no argument. America would know that there was a concrete core just like the engineer of record identified to Newsweek days after 9-11.
Because you ignore violations of law that would give you the correct elevator dimensions you have no credibility agent.
On top of that, this appears to be concrete.
and the core is always empty in 9-11 images.
there were no violations of lawe, other than YOUR failure to pay chicld supportThat is what the perpetrators of mass murder would want you to say. However, you cannot credibly do that while ignoring the violations of law that enable your argument.
If guliani had not taken the WTC documents with 6,000 photo files and the plans, you would have no argument. America would know that there was a concrete core just like the engineer of record identified to Newsweek days after 9-11.
Because you ignore violations of law that would give you the correct elevator dimensions you have no credibility agent.
On top of that, this appears to be concrete.
and the core is always empty in 9-11 images.
the engineer of record never said any suck thing, you are totally fucking delusional if you think Robertson said his building had a concrete core when it DIDNT
and that lower image shows STEEL CORE COLUMNS
you remain a delusional fucking moron
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,464
Are you trying to say you know more about NY law than the NYCLU? Typical agent, all text and no fact.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020224015919/http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html
Our concern is based on the following facts, as we understand them. On or about December 24, 2001, Commissioner George Rios, on behalf of the City of New York and/or the Department of Records and Information Services of the City of New York, entered into a contract with the Rudolph W. Giuliani Center for Urban Affairs Inc., signed by Saul Cohen, President, concerning the records of the mayoralty of Rudolph Giuliani. The records are said to include appointment books, cabinet meeting audiotapes, e-mails, telephone logs, advance and briefing memos, correspondence, transition materials, and private schedules, as well as Mr. Giuliani’s departmental, travel, event, subject, and Gracie Mansion files. Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.
These provisions violate the Freedom of Information Law as interpreted by the New York Court of Appeals in Capital Newspapers, Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen, 69 N.Y.2d 246 (1987).
The City also violated the Freedom of Information Law by transferring records to the custody of the Giuliani Center without first compiling a detailed list. Section 87(3)(c) of the Public Officer Law obligates an agency to maintain a “reasonably detailed list by subject matter” of all agency records, “whether or not [those records are] available under this article.” Such a list is necessary to prevent the inappropriate destruction of documents and to inform the public as to the content of the documentary collection. The list appended to the December 24th contract as Attachment A does not contain sufficiently detailed information to satisfy this requirement. And the documents appear, therefore, to have been transferred without complying with this requirement.
Finally, the City Charter vests DORIS with the responsibility to preserve and receive all city records of historical, research, cultural or other important value. City Charter, Chapter 72, § 3004(1)(c). The City Charter mandates that DORIS make all of the materials it maintains available for public inspection. §3004(2)(c). The City Charter also mandates that all records which are deemed to be of historical or research value be transferred by the city official or agency to DORIS’ municipal archives for “permanent custody.” City Charter, Chapter 49, §1133(b); RCNY §1-07. In transferring the documents to the Center, the City has violated this mandate and has made it less likely that the materials will be readily accessible for public inspection.
http://web.archive.org/web/20020224015919/http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html
Our concern is based on the following facts, as we understand them. On or about December 24, 2001, Commissioner George Rios, on behalf of the City of New York and/or the Department of Records and Information Services of the City of New York, entered into a contract with the Rudolph W. Giuliani Center for Urban Affairs Inc., signed by Saul Cohen, President, concerning the records of the mayoralty of Rudolph Giuliani. The records are said to include appointment books, cabinet meeting audiotapes, e-mails, telephone logs, advance and briefing memos, correspondence, transition materials, and private schedules, as well as Mr. Giuliani’s departmental, travel, event, subject, and Gracie Mansion files. Giuliani's "World Trade Center files" and "Millennium Project files," together with 6000 files of photographs, 1000 audiotapes, and 15,000 videotapes, are also reported to be a part of the records covered by the contract.
These provisions violate the Freedom of Information Law as interpreted by the New York Court of Appeals in Capital Newspapers, Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Whalen, 69 N.Y.2d 246 (1987).
The City also violated the Freedom of Information Law by transferring records to the custody of the Giuliani Center without first compiling a detailed list. Section 87(3)(c) of the Public Officer Law obligates an agency to maintain a “reasonably detailed list by subject matter” of all agency records, “whether or not [those records are] available under this article.” Such a list is necessary to prevent the inappropriate destruction of documents and to inform the public as to the content of the documentary collection. The list appended to the December 24th contract as Attachment A does not contain sufficiently detailed information to satisfy this requirement. And the documents appear, therefore, to have been transferred without complying with this requirement.
Finally, the City Charter vests DORIS with the responsibility to preserve and receive all city records of historical, research, cultural or other important value. City Charter, Chapter 72, § 3004(1)(c). The City Charter mandates that DORIS make all of the materials it maintains available for public inspection. §3004(2)(c). The City Charter also mandates that all records which are deemed to be of historical or research value be transferred by the city official or agency to DORIS’ municipal archives for “permanent custody.” City Charter, Chapter 49, §1133(b); RCNY §1-07. In transferring the documents to the Center, the City has violated this mandate and has made it less likely that the materials will be readily accessible for public inspection.
you fucking moron, that has already been debunked as BULLSHITAre you trying to say you know more about NY law than the NYCLU? Typical agent, all text and no fact.
the records involved were copied and returned,m you have been shown the proof before
but you will continue in your delusional rantings and deny you have ever been shown
and funny, if this was still an ISSUE for the NYCLU, why is it NOT still on THEIR domain
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,466
Your text is null agent because your ffellow agent cannot show the elevator dimensions from official source while also refusing to recognize WHY there are no plans.
Oops!
It was an issue but because of the infiltration of the truth movement the public was directed AWAY from the serious issues, violations of law. As an agent of the perps you still work to downplay that.
Both towers had a rectangular concrete tubular core.
All of the evidence shows this.
Oops!
It was an issue but because of the infiltration of the truth movement the public was directed AWAY from the serious issues, violations of law. As an agent of the perps you still work to downplay that.
Both towers had a rectangular concrete tubular core.
All of the evidence shows this.
every post you make is null, dipshitYour text is null agent because your ffellow agent cannot show the elevator dimensions from official source while also refusing to recognize WHY there are no plans.
Fizz
Rookie
- Nov 20, 2009
- 4,391
- 346
- 0
- Banned
- #7,471
same insane bullshit over and over again. chris's core has been proven to be nonexistent a million different ways. he never backs up any of the stupid shit he says.
did you ever find a source for your "elevator guide rail support steel" claim yet?
of course not....
because there was no such thing. what chris claims is "elevator guide rail support steel" is actually THE STEEL CORE.
did you ever find a source for your "elevator guide rail support steel" claim yet?
of course not....
because there was no such thing. what chris claims is "elevator guide rail support steel" is actually THE STEEL CORE.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,472
If there were a steel core, then agents would be able to show this structure on 9-11 in the core area.
No one ever has.
What shows is this, which can only be concrete.
No one ever has.
What shows is this, which can only be concrete.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,474
Agent, you are defeated by Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
While your persistent null spamming shows, very well, your unreasonable agenda.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
While your persistent null spamming shows, very well, your unreasonable agenda.
Last edited:
YOU are the one posting the spam you delusional fucktardAgent, you are defeated by Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
<deleted totally debunked bullshit>
While your persistent null spamming shows, very well, your unreasonable agenda.
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,476
Does that explain your failure to post an image of this core on 9-11?
here are two you dishonest piece of shitDoes that explain your failure to post an image of this core on 9-11?
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,478
here are two you dishonest piece of shitDoes that explain your failure to post an image of this core on 9-11?
For the record you are stating those images show identical objects.
The perpetrators of mass murder would like that you have posted that. It helps to conceal their method of mass murder.
Have you accounted for the difference in height in the objects of the 2 images?
Why does one image show a slightly taller, very straight, larger, more solid object and the later image show fine semi vertical, semi straight, elements with light coming through faintly where the object is actually see thru, if they are same object?
Why does the second on show the objects all with a slight arc to the right with no rectangular opening?
Come on agent. Do your thing. We are exposing you acting in the perpetrators interests, you know, treason.
show a transitional photo between the two in timehere are two you dishonest piece of shitDoes that explain your failure to post an image of this core on 9-11?
For the record you are stating those images show identical objects.
The perpetrators of mass murder would like that you have posted that. It helps to conceal their method of mass murder.
Have you accounted for the difference in height in the objects of the 2 images?
Why does one image show a slightly taller, very straight, larger, more solid object and the later image show fine semi vertical, semi straight, elements with light coming through faintly where the object is actually see thru, if they are same object?
Why does the second on show the objects all with a slight arc to the right with no rectangular opening?
Come on agent. Do your thing. We are exposing you acting in the perpetrators interests, you know, treason.
you cant
because they were taken seconds apart
and you can see that in the dust cloud progression
you remain a total fucktard delusional deadbeat
Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Thread starter
- #7,480
show a transitional photo between the two in timehere are two you dishonest piece of shit
For the record you are stating those images show identical objects.
The perpetrators of mass murder would like that you have posted that. It helps to conceal their method of mass murder.
Have you accounted for the difference in height in the objects of the 2 images?
Why does one image show a slightly taller, very straight, larger, more solid object and the later image show fine semi vertical, semi straight, elements with light coming through faintly where the object is actually see thru, if they are same object?
Why does the second on show the objects all with a slight arc to the right with no rectangular opening?
Come on agent. Do your thing. We are exposing you acting in the perpetrators interests, you know, treason.
you cant
because they were taken seconds apart
and you can see that in the dust cloud progression
you remain a total fucktard delusional deadbeat
Show one image of the core you assert stood on 9-11 when it is coming apart in front of cameras. This.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 558
- Replies
- 362
- Views
- 15K
- Replies
- 305
- Views
- 16K
- Locked
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 1K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 16K
- Views
- 292K
- Replies
- 8
- Views
- 48
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 168
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8513
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-