FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Liability]

All that crap text posted by agents of treason but NOT ONE image of this core on 9-11.

* * * *

I called it!

Of course, CriscoFEARa will tell us that it's all disinformation planted by agents.

Damn! That was easy.

 

[Christophera]

Text is always easy.

But posting an image of this core on 9-11 is impossible!

 

[Liability]

Text is always easy.

But posting an image of this core on 9-11 is impossible![/b][/size]

http://algoxybullshit.com/psychopathicliar/psycopathicimages/feminehygieneodorproblemcore.gif

The audio from Robertson wasn't "easy."

That you have never been able (and never will be able) to back up your bullshit is undoubted.

The specific image you allude to (I edited your linkie because I wouldn't want to assist you in getting any traffic to your blood-money web-site, you filthy twat) is irrelevant.

The actual photographs on the web site I offered (viva2a) are more than sufficient.

You are helplessly unable to refute ANY of the actual facts.

 

[Christophera]

You did not post any images or substance in support of the FEMA core because none exists.

Your garbage link has the same old misrepresentations of construction photos totally exposed by this one panel filed.

9-11-misprision of treason, Title 18, part I, chapter 115, §2382

Butt plates cannot be used to join sections of "core columns". Therefore the empty core is explained.

 

[Liability]

You did not post any images or substance in support of the FEMA core because none exists.

Your garbage link has the same old misrepresentations of construction photos totally exposed by this one panel filed.



Butt plates cannot be used to join sections of "core columns". Therefore the [url=http://home.comcast.net/~jeffrey.king2/spire_dust-3.jpg]empty core is explained.

That you have no clue on the topic is beyond question.

What you call a butt plate isn't a butt plate. That was already explained to you.

You COULD go educate yourself, but that would interfere with your treasonous agenda of giving aid and comfort to the actual enemy, you pussy lying sack of shit.

Pardon me for having to edit your image attempts, but I refuse to assist you in ripping people off, you sick clit.

 

[Christophera]

Apparently you pretend to think that gumjobs assertion that what is seen covering the top of the vertical steel with no holes in it is a lifting lug or pad eye is credible.

Of course a lifting lug would only be on the side and leave the top end of the extension steel free to join it with the next piece just as we see light coming through the first red oval in the bottom image which DOES show a lifting lug.

The fact that you removed the image and failed to provide any actual reason, MARKS YOU as an agent.

 

[Fizz]

Apparently you pretend to think that gumjobs assertion that what is seen covering the top of the vertical steel with no holes in it is a lifting lug or pad eye is credible.

Of course a lifting lug would only be on the side and leave the top end of the extension steel free to join it with the next piece just as we see light coming through the first red oval in the bottom image which DOES show a lifting lug.

The fact that you removed the image and failed to provide any actual reason, MARKS YOU as an agent.

when viewed in a clear photo up close it is clear that what you call "butt plates" are no such thing.

and that is, of course, why you keep showing small pictures from a distance. because all the clear photos prove you are a fucking moron!!

 

[Christophera]

agents are the ones guilty of using pictures taking at a distance, that are blurry, for misrepresenting the elevator guide rail support steel as "core columns" because the "butt plates" cannot be distinguished.

 

[Liability]

The VIVA website I provided earlier (and I realize I'm not the first to use that resource or cite to it here) offers some very clear information on how the steel got joined together in the steel core and how it got attached to the flooring, trusses, etc.

"Butt plates" have nothing whatsoever to do with any of it.

CriscoFEARa is just wrong. That's all. Nothing new there.

 

[Christophera]

Hmmmmm, very clear text huh?





Here is some very clear text.

You are an agent working to conceal treason

In this case your behavior proves it true.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Hmmmmm, very clear text huh?





Here is some very clear text.

You are an agent working to conceal treason

In this case your behavior proves it true.

And here's some very clear text for you;

YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL LITTLE MAN WHO IS A DEADBEAT AND IS WORKING TO COLLECT MONEY VIA YOUR BLOODSUCKING ALGOXY WEBSITE. YOU SPEND YOUR DAY HIDING FROM THE BAILIFF WHO COMES TO EMPTY OUT YOUR POCKETS.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

agents are the ones guilty of using pictures taking at a distance, that are blurry, for misrepresenting the elevator guide rail support steel as "core columns" because the "butt plates" cannot be distinguished.

This from the KING of blurry, distant, fuzzy, out of focus pictures of dust and smoke!

 

[Rat in the Hat]

More clear text.

WATCH OUT FOR THE BLINKING MEDICINE MAN CHRISSY. HE'S RIGHT BEHIND YOU!

 

[Rat in the Hat]

On a personal note Chrissy, did you and Citizen Pat have a lover's quarrel? She hasn't been here defending you for a couple weeks now.

 

[Christophera]

It is clear that you must rely on the psyops and the false social group because you have no evidence.

This photo clearly shows that there IS NO STRUCTURAL steel protruding from the core and the top of what is seen can only be concrete.

For this core to have existed,

there would be a great deal of steel protruding from the top photo. The core columns in the lower photo did not exist.

 

[Fizz]

----delusional bullshit removed------

take your anti-psychotic medication. you are having another episode.

 

[Christophera]

agent cannot show the core they assert existed on 9-11.

But the concrete core has independently verified evidence substantiating it.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

agent cannot show the core they assert existed on 9-11.

But the concrete core has independently verified evidence substantiating it.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

all this crap has been debunked over and over again.

you're a retard.

 

[Christophera]

Your masters, the infiltrators of the US government wish it was debunked. It is not. Your text is impotent.

Hard evidence from the scene of the crime shows a concrete core wall at 400 foot off the ground toppling into the empty core.

 

[Liability]

Your masters, the infiltrators of the US government wish it was debunked. It is not. Your text is impotent.

Hard evidence from the scene of the crime shows a concrete core wall at 400 foot off the ground toppling into the empty core.

It, of course, shows no such thing. It can't. There was no concrete core wall. In any event, the object you falsely insist was a concrete wall could be a lot of other things. There is no way to determine if it is even concrete from just looking at it in that highly distorted view. If concrete, it could only have been flooring. It might be wall, but in that event it was drywall and gypsum since the core wall was built without masonry as has been proved by quoting Robertson.

In brief, CriscoFEARa, you remain nothing but a liar and (thankfully) you are a miserable failure in your treasonous propaganda efforts.