Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You attempt to assert it is a floor.
Bwaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaa . . . where did the floor fall from to get into the vertical position we first see it in?
Come on lilybilly, give us a nice reasonable explanation.
You attempt to assert it is a floor.
Bwaaaaahaaaaaaaaaaa . . . where did the floor fall from to get into the vertical position we first see it in?
Come on lilybilly, give us a nice reasonable explanation.
you have exactly ZERO evidence of either proposition.
But we know it cannot have been a concrete core wall, retard, since the core was built without concrete.
you have exactly zero evidence of either proposition.
But we know it cannot have been a concrete core wall, retard, since the core was built without concrete.
The reverse of what agents post is most often true.
Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
robertson is verified by oxford, verifying domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of wtc 2 core, verifying the top of wtc 2 core falling onto wtc 3, the wtc 1 rebar, just after the wtc 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the wtc 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on wtc 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the wtc 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised nist analysis of free fall by bazant et. Al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
all debunked already.The reverse of what agents post is most often true.
Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.
Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
Christopharter said:Here is the WTC 1 concrete core wall toppling into the empty core.(image removed to stop blood money clicking)
unsubstantiated claim==delusional bullshit removed===
The thickness of perhaps 4 feet is easily seen[/url], and there is another photo from a helicopter at the same instant to show the basic size.
unsubstantiated claim. no documentation to support absurd claim of "elevator guide rail support steel" or "butt plates" in use.our text inadequately attempts to support a lie. The lie that the steel in the core was "core columns". Only a 100% deep fillet weld on all 4 side of a box column will suffice for a "core column". Butt plates do work for elevator guide rail support steel very well because they facilitate alignment for elevators. However, they always leave an empty core on 9-11 because they have no strength and wil not stand if the concrete core wall are brought down.
The reverse is true, as usual with your posts. Elevator guide rail support steel occupying the core as the ONLY vertical steel in the core is proven by the butt plates which cannot be used to join sections of "core columns".
steel core columnsAs my signature says, agents refuse to recognize evidence and the evidence of butt plates that show weak connection between vertical steel in the core is conclusive when accompanied by the fact the CORE IS EMPTY in all 9-11 images.
elevator guide rail support steel
Empty core.
Same distance as the other photo, slightly different zoom. The fine vertical elements have a consisten arch to them. Totally different than the spire and framed wall under it.
Of course, as an agent supporting the concealment of treason, you will refuse to recognize facts about evidence.
and in BOTH cases it is core columns, dipshitSame distance as the other photo, slightly different zoom. The fine vertical elements have a consisten arch to them. Totally different than the spire and framed wall under it.
Of course, as an agent supporting the concealment of treason, you will refuse to recognize facts about evidence.
Christosnake said:Same distance as the other photo, slightly different zoom. The fine vertical elements have a consisten arch to them. Totally different than the spire and framed wall under it.
