FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

Since you cannot show this core on 9-11.

femacore.gif

And again, Goof-0 does not fail to meet my expectations.

:clap2: :clap2: :clap2:
 
Can somebody explain to me the relevance of this thread. The elephant in the room is that billions of people witnessed planes laden with jet fuel smash into buildings which acted as the catalyst for bringing them down. These conspiracy theorists are complete nut-jobs.
 
Can somebody explain to me the relevance of this thread. The elephant in the room is that billions of people witnessed planes laden with jet fuel smash into buildings which acted as the catalyst for bringing them down. These conspiracy theorists are complete nut-jobs.
Goof-O-Phera is a "special" case
he believes in invisicrete

see through concrete
 
Uhh, where is the INVISISTEEL?

spire_dust-3.jpg


Where is it. This silhouette shows that the supposed steel core columns could not have been continuous. They did not exist.

1r6m9x.jpg
 
Then there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.

There is a mass of Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.
 
Then there are no steel columns in the upper left and none lower to the right. Concrete can look like that, but not steel columns.

There is a mass of Independently verified evidence of the concrete core.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work for justifying explanation for collapse, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

:lame2::spam:
 
there wouldnt HAVE to be
there werent on that one, but there were on the other one
the rule of CHANCE

you fucking moron
 

Forum List

Back
Top