FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

ah, they changed the location
LOL
hilarious.gif

and you had to look for it again
LOL

There, your post is perfect now.
jeanette-aw-crazy-02.gif

Now yours is perfect!

:dance:
 
fuck off moron

Fuck 'em


Hey, Wanna go grab a beer Dive?

C'mon, let's get the fuck out of here. :beer:
i dont drink beer, but us leaving his thread is what he would want
that way he can attempt to deceive others

good point. let's flood him with facts. (shouldn't take long)

{Fully fueled jet liners @ 500 MPH + buildings = lot's o' problems}


[/end]


...your driving. :D
 
Frank De Martini (RIP), was an engineer/architect that worked for the PA. He explains how the Twins could survive multiple airliner impacts.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU[/ame]

The steel net, "like a mosquito net" and grid was the rebar of the concrete core walls. I believe he was told to not use the word concrete.

It is certain that the steel framework does is not described. A net or grid refers to primarily a 2 dimensional figure. The concrete core shear wall.
 
Frank De Martini (RIP), was an engineer/architect that worked for the PA. He explains how the Twins could survive multiple airliner impacts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sO1JxpVb2eU

The steel net, "like a mosquito net" and grid was the rebar of the concrete core walls. I believe he was told to not use the word concrete.

It is certain that the steel framework does is not described. A net or grid refers to primarily a 2 dimensional figure. The concrete core shear wall.
he said he believes, not that it was, but what he said at the very begining was true, that it was designed to withstand the impact of A 707
and he was referring to the outer shell as the screen netting
you remain a pathetic moron
 
Last edited:
What is pathetic is you trying to refer to the framework as a net or grid while not being able to show this core on 9-11.

femacore.gif


But what is seen is far too small to be structural steel members. What is does resemble is rebar.

spire_dust-3.jpg


No agent, that is far too small to be structural steel and to prove it I show an image taken a few seconds before from the same camera showing structural steel before it fell.

wtc1.spire.hudson.annote1.jpg
 
you say its not possible to be shown, then post a series of photos that do just that, SHOW IT

you are a fucking moron
\
 
Last edited:
Your disinfo tactic falls flat because people know the difference between structural steel an structural concrete. The above proves strucutral steel seen is outside the core. This concrete IS the core of WTC 2.

southcorestands.gif


No steel whatsoever is seen.
 
no concrete is seen in that photo either
but in several other photos you post steel is clearly seen and you just ignore what it is and call it something else
 
Your disinfo tactic falls flat because people know the difference between structural steel an structural concrete. The above proves strucutral steel seen is outside the core. This concrete IS the core of WTC 2.

southcorestands.gif


No steel whatsoever is seen.

Actually Chris you have got this "arse about face" as usual.

Most people actually know when they are being subjected to disinformation, because they have a functioning brain in their heads, which tells them they are being taken for a ride by a charlatan like you. You know this charlatan person because you have trained him to be that way.

Cotton wool in the big floppy ears is a dead give away for starters.

Living in a cave with no underwear and stained trousers is another.

Claiming to be intelligent and an engineer with full knowledge of a missing documentally is yet another.

But .. to be running your own website with you as all the members and guests is stunningly obvious that you are simply a waste of internet space.

Can you fry an egg Chris .. if so why ?? :eusa_pray: :lol: :cuckoo:
 
Meaning you have no verifying evidence to support that this core existed.

femacore.gif


Why don't you have some verifying evidence? Why, what is the matter with you? The construction photos are misrepresentations. The butt plates prove that the vertical steel is elevator guide rail support steel and NOT steel core columns.

panel_5.jpg
 
Not "core columns" but steel in the core. If they were "core columns" they would be standing on 9-11 in the core area because they would have the strength. Obviously they do not have that strength because they are never seen in the core on 9-11. The below is too small. It is rebar.

spire_dust-3.jpg
 
Not "core columns" but steel in the core. If they were "core columns" they would be standing on 9-11 in the core area because they would have the strength. Obviously they do not have that strength because they are never seen in the core on 9-11. The below is too small. It is rebar.

spire_dust-3.jpg
dipshit, you lack perspective
the distance only makes them appear small
compare the size of the windows on the near by buildings?
do you think those windows are only 6" wide?
 
Last edited:
Not "core columns" but steel in the core. If they were "core columns" they would be standing on 9-11 in the core area because they would have the strength. Obviously they do not have that strength because they are never seen in the core on 9-11. The below is too small. It is rebar.

spire_dust-3.jpg
dipshit, you lack perspective
the distance only makes them appear small
compare the size of the windows on the near by buildings?
do you think those windows are only 6" wide?

wtc_demolition.jpg


This is an exploding building. This is not a collapse. Care to refute this fact? You can't.

Nanothermite has been found in the WTC dust.
**

A spout of orange molten metal seen just before the South Tower's fall in videos of the Tower's north face around the crash zone

Reports of molten metal in the remarkably hot rubble of Ground Zero

High levels of metals found in aluminothermic incendiaries -- such as manganese, zinc, and barium -- in samples of World Trade Center dust

Remains of the Towers' structural steel showing severe corrosive attack involving sulfur

An iron-rich sphere found in dust form the Twin Towers. The solidified droplet indicates temperatures in excess of the melting point of iron (2795ºF).

Minute solidified droplets of previously molten iron in samples of World Trade Center dust

Pieces of active nano-engineered aluminothermic chips in samples of World Trade Center dust
 
Last edited:
Not "core columns" but steel in the core. If they were "core columns" they would be standing on 9-11 in the core area because they would have the strength. Obviously they do not have that strength because they are never seen in the core on 9-11. The below is too small. It is rebar.

spire_dust-3.jpg
dipshit, you lack perspective
the distance only makes them appear small
compare the size of the windows on the near by buildings?
do you think those windows are only 6" wide?

wtc_demolition.jpg


This is an exploding building. This is not a collapse. Care to refute this fact? You can't.

Nanothermite has been found in the WTC dust.
**

A spout of orange molten metal seen just before the South Tower's fall in videos of the Tower's north face around the crash zone

Reports of molten metal in the remarkably hot rubble of Ground Zero

High levels of metals found in aluminothermic incendiaries -- such as manganese, zinc, and barium -- in samples of World Trade Center dust

Remains of the Towers' structural steel showing severe corrosive attack involving sulfur

An iron-rich sphere found in dust form the Twin Towers. The solidified droplet indicates temperatures in excess of the melting point of iron (2795ºF).

Minute solidified droplets of previously molten iron in samples of World Trade Center dust

Pieces of active nano-engineered aluminothermic chips in samples of World Trade Center dust

aluminothermic? Oh you mean paint. YOu found paint there...good job loser/CD (one in the same).
 

Forum List

Back
Top